Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1871 Cases
158 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Toof v. Martin
Toof et al. v. Martin, Assignee, etc. 1. By insolvency, as used in the bankrupt act when applied to traders and merchants, is meant inability of a purty to pay his debts, as they become due, in the ordinary course of business. 2. The transf
Clyde v. United States
Clyde v. United States. A rule of the Court of Claims, requiring parties to present their claims to an executive department before suing in that court, is unauthorized and void. Appeal from the Court of Claims; the case being argued and dis
United States v. Clyde
United States v. Clyde. Receiving payment of a sum of money for a disputed claim against the government and giving a receipt in full therefor, will, in the absence of proof of any mistake, be deemed a satisfaction of the claim. Appeal from
Low v. Austin
Low et al. v. Austin. 1. Goods imported from a foreign country, upon which the duties and charges at the custom-house have been paid, are not subject to State taxation whilst remaining in the original cases, unbroken and unsold, in the hand
United States v. Wormer
United States v. Wormer. The United States contracted, during the war to suppress the Rebellion, with a dealer in horses for a large number of cavalry horses; he to be paid on the completion of the contract, should Congress make an appropri
Boyden v. United States
Boyden et al. v. United States. 1. A receiver of public moneys of the United States does not stand in the position of an ordinary bailee; he is bound to higher responsibility. Upon a suit, therefore, on a bond “for the faithful discharge of
Webb v. Sharp
Webb, Trustee, v. Sharp, Marshal. In the District of Columbia a landlord has a tacit lien for his rent on the chattels of his tenant on the demised premises, from the time the chattels are placed therein until the expiration of three months
Yeager v. Farwell
Yeager v. Farwell. 1. A., residing in St. Louis, and treating through B., of the same place, for a loan of money from C., in Boston, got a promise from C. of the money wanted, A.’s own note and a mortgage by him on real estate near St. Loui
Norwich Transportation Co. v. Flint
Norwich Transportation Company v. Flint. In a suit by a passenger against a steamboat company for injuries done to him on the deck of a steamboat by the discharge of a gun by some disorderly soldiers, whom the transportation company bad tak
Bethell v. Mathews
Bethell v. Mathews. 1. A plaintiff in error cannot take advantage of exceptions in his own favor even if erroneous; a matter often decided before. 2. Under the act of March 3d, 1865, authorizing the trial of facts by Circuit Courts, the cou
The Protector
The Protector. 1. The beginning and termination of, the late rebellion in reference to acta of limitation, is to be determined by some public act of the political department. 2. The yfav did not begin or close at the same time in all the St
Trebilcock v. Wilson
Trebilcock v. Wilson et ux. 1. Where a plaintiff in error set up in the court below that he was entitled to have a note held by him and made by the defendant in error, paid in gold or silver coin under the Constitution, upon a proper constr
Van Slyke v. Wisconsin
VAN SLYKE v. WISCONSIN. BAGNALL v. SAME. ERROR to the supreme court of the STATE OF WISCONSIN. Nos. 261 and 262. Argued November 16, 1871. Decided November 27, 1871. The right of a State to tax shares of stockholders in national banking ass
Ex parte Waples
EX PARTE WAPLES. ORIGINAL. No. 10. Original. Argued December 19, 20, 1870. Decided January 9, 1871. Ex parte Graham, 10 Wall. 541, followed. Petition for writ of prohibition. .The case is stated in the opinion. Mr. Thomas J. Durant for peti
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.