Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1871 Cases
158 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Bath County v. Amy
Bath County v. Amy. The Circuit Courts of the United States have no power to issue writs of mandamus to State courts, by way of original proceeding, and where such writ is neither necessary nor ancillary to any jurisdiction which the court
Ex parte McNiel
Ex parte McNiel. 1. The statutes of the several States regulating the subject of pilotage are, in view of the numerous acts of Congress recognizing and adopting them, to be regarded as constitutionally made, until Congress by its own acts s
Insurance Co. v. Wilkinson
Insurance Company v. Wilkinson. 1. The assured, in a life policy in reply to the question, “had she ever had a serious personal injury,” answered “ no.” She had, ten years before, fallen from a tree. The criteria of a serious personal injur
Pennsylvania College Cases
Pennsylvania College Cases. The legislature of Pennsylvania chartered a college “ at Canonsburg,” by the name of the Jefferson College, “in Canonsburg,” giving to it a constitution and declaring that the same should “ be and remain the invi
Wells v. McGregor
Wells v. McGregor. 1. A deeree-of the highest court of a State affirming an order of an inferior court, by which a motion to set aside a sheriff's return to an execution was allowed and an alias execution awarded, is not a “ final judgment
Hampton v. Rouse
Hampton v. Rouse. In a writ of error to a joint judgment against several, all must join. The omission of one or more is an irregularity for which the writ will be dismissed; a matter often held. ■ This was a motion to dismiss a writ of erro
Philip v. Nock
Philip et al. v. Nock. The right given by the acts of February 18th, 1861, and July 20th, 1870, of appeal or writ of error without regard to the sum in controversy in questions arising under laws of the United States, granting or conferring
Steinbach v. Insurance Co.
Steinbach v. Insurance Company. On a policy of insurance requiring, though in a printed part, that fire works should be specially written in it, and which added 50 cents on the $100 as premium for insuring them, Held that evidence was right
Pumpelly v. Green Bay Co.
Pumpelly v. Green Bay Company. 1. Where a plea relies on a statute authority as a defence, it must allege the facts which it asserts to be so authorized, and cannot pleud generally that it complied with the statute. Hence a plea is bad whic
Reiche v. Smythe
Reiche v. Smythe, Collector. Where an act of 1861 exempted from duty “animals of all kinds; birds, singing and other, and land and water fowls,” and a later act levied a duty of 20 per cent. “ on all horses, mules, cattle, sheep, hogs, and
Semmes v. Hartford Insurance
Semmes v. Hartford Insurance Company. 1 A condition in a contract of insurance that no suit or action shall be sustainable unless commenced within the time of twelve months next after the loss shall occur, and in case such action shall be c
Pargoud v. United States
Pargoud v. United States. The President’s proclamation of December 25th, 1868, granting pardon and amnesty unconditionally and without reservation to all who participated, directly or indirectly, in the late rebellion, relieves claimants of
Armstrong v. United States
Armstrong v. United States. 1. The President’s proclamation of the 25th December, 1858, granting ”unconditionally and without reservation to all and every person who directly or indirectly participated in the late insurrection or rebellion,
Carroll v. United States
Carroll v. United States. In a claim by an administrator of a deceased person, against the United States, under the Abandoned and Captured Property Act of March 12th, 3863, which makes proof that the owner never gave aid or comfort to the r
United States v. Klein
United States v. Klein. 1. The act of March 12th, 1863 (12 Stat. at Large, 820), to provide for the collection of abandoned and captured property in insurrectionary districts within the United States, does not confiscate, or in any case abs
Norwich Co. v. Wright
Norwich Company v. Wright. 1. The act of Congress of 1851, limiting the liability of ship-owners, includes collisions, as well as injuries to cargo; so that if a collision happens between two vessels at sea, and one of them is in fault with
Gibson v. Chouteau
Gibson v. Chouteau. 1. Statutes of limitation of a State do not apply to the State itself, unless it is expressly designated, or the mischiefs to be remedied are of such a nature that it must necessarily be included; and they do not apply t
Samson v. Smiley
Note. At the same time with the preceding case was adjudged another from the same court with it, to wit, the ease of Samson v. Smiley. The case of Johnson v. Towsley, held applicable although no patent certificate was issued to the claimant
Johnson v. Towsley
Johnson v. Towsley. 1. The question of the eonclusiveness of the action of the land officers in issuing a patent on the rights of other persons reconsidered and former decisions affirmed. 2. The tenth section of the act of June 12th, 1858 (
Curtis v. Whitney
Curtis v. Whitney. 1. A statute does not necessarily impair the obligation of a contract because it may affect it retrospectively, or because it enhances the difficulty of performance to one party or diminishes the value of the performance
Rice v. Houston
Rice v. Houston, Administrator. A citizen of one State getting letters of administration on the estate of .a decedent there, its citizen also, and afterwards removing to another State, and becoming a citizen of it, may sue in the Circuit Co
Halliburton v. United States
Note. At the same time, with the preceding case, was heard another, in its chief point identical with it, but embracing also a.minor point of evidence. It was the case of Halliburton, Marshal, v. United States. 1. The doctrine of the preced
Bevans v. United States
Bevans, Receiver, v. United States. I. Where a receiver of public moneys has such moneys in his hands, which would not have been in his hands at all, if he had paid them over with the promptness that the acts of Congress and the Treasury Re
Wheeler v. Harris
Wheeler v. Harris. 1. On appeal to the Circuit Court from a decree in the District Court for the payment of money, the Circuit Court affirmed the judgment of the District Court with costs to be taxed, from which affirmance the respondent to
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.