Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1880 Cases
225 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Benton County v. Rollens
BENTON COUNTY v. ROLLENS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OR MISSOURI. No. 147. Argued December 15, 1880, Decided December 20, 1880. Scotland County v. Thomas, 94 U. S. 682, and Schuyler County v. Th
McLaughlin v. Fowler
McLAUGHLIN v. FOWLER. SAME v. THORPE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Nos. 94 and 95. Argued December 2, 1880. Decided December 13, 1880. In cases brought here from state courts this court can only look beyond the Fed
White v. United States
WHITE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 82. Argued November 29, 1880. Decided December 13, 1880. When a charter party provides that the hirer of the vessel need not make good any loss arising from ordinary wear and tear
Groat v. O'Hare
GROAT v. O’HARE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 35. Argued October 21, 1880. Decided November 8, 1880. This case is reversed because this court is not satisfied that the court below reached a proper conclusio
France v. Missouri
FRANCE v. MISSOURI. ERROR to the SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 915. Submitted October 18, 1880. Decided October 25, 1880. No Federal question is raised in this case. Motion to dismiss. The case is stated in the opinion.
Richmond Mining Co. v. Eureka Mining Co.
Richmond Mining Company v. Eureka Mining Company. E. and R., two mining companies, in settlemeiit of the differences between them respecting the possession of certain ground and the ores therein contained in the Eureka Mining District in Ne
Brown v. Slee
Brown v. Slee. A., the executor of the deceased member of a firm, entered into a contract In writing with B., the surviving partner, whereby he sold and transferred to the latter all the interest of the testator in the effects of the partne
Railroad Co. v. Falconer
Railroad Company v. Falconer. Railroad Company v. Weeks. 1. In accordance with the petition of the tax-payers of a town in New York, dated March 25, 1872, the county judge appointed commissioners, who were empowered and directed to subscrib
Thompson v. Perrine
Thompson v. Perrine. 1. A town in New York was authorized, upon certain conditions, to subscribe for railway stock, and sell its bonds at not less than their par value to raise funds wherewith to pay therefor. The subscription was made; but
Johnston v. Laflin
Johnston v. Laflin. 1. The title to shares of the capital stock of a national bank passes when the owner delivers his stock certificate to the purchaser, with authority to him or any one whom he may name to transfer them on the books of the
Crouch v. Roemer
Crouch v. Roemer. 1. Reissued letters-patent No. 4289, granted March 7,1871, to George Crouch, for an improvement in straps for shawls, are void, by reason of the prior knowledge and public use of the invention which they describe. 2. The s
Ex parte Railway Co.
Ex parte Railway Company. X. The judgment of the Circuit Court, on a plea to the jurisdiction, will not be reviewed here upon a petition for a mandamus. 2. An attachment cannot be sued out of that court against the property of the defendant
Cook v. Lillo
Cook v. Lillo. 1. Thorington v. Smith (8 Wall. 1) cited and approved. 2. Payment of a promissory note, executed at New Orleans March 26, 1862, will be enforced in lawful money where payments on account of the principal and interest were in
Manufacturing Co. v. Corbin
Manufacturing Company v. Corbin. Reissued letters-patent are void, if they embrace a broader claim than that for which the original létters were issued. Appear from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of Connecticut. The
National Bank v. Insurance Co.
National Bank v. Insurance Company. Where, upon the undisputed facts of the case, the plaintiff is not entitled to recover, the court may instruct the jury to find a verdict for the defendant. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States
Life Insurance v. Bangs
Life Insurance Company v. Bangs. Where there has been no newly discovered evidence, a bill in equity will not lie to cancel a contract or enjoin a judgment thereon, where the complainant, against whom it was rendered, sets up as grounds of
Whitsitt v. Railroad Co.
Whitsitt v. Railroad Company. The act of March 3, 1875, c. 137 (18 Stat., pt. 3, p. 470), did not change the jurisdiction of this court to review the final judgment or decree of the Circuit Court. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United
Clark v. Killian
Clark v. Killian. 1. The settlement of lands by a man npon his wife is not invalid, if the rights of existing creditors are not thereby impaired. 2. A bill of r.eview is the appropriate mode of correcting errors apparent on the face of the
Hinckley v. Morton
Hinckley v. Morton. Where the appellee has a color of right to the dismissal of an appeal, he may unite with a motion therefQr one to affirm the decree. Motion to dismiss an appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Souther
Railway Co. v. Sprague
Railway Company v. Sprague. 1. A mortgage executed by a railway company, to secure its bonds, provides that, in case of default for six months in the payment of the interest upon either of them, the entire amount of the debt secured “ shall
The "Connemara."
The “Connemara.” Where salvors united in a claim for a single salvage service, jointly rendered by them, the owner of the property is entitled io an appeal where the sum decreed exceeds $5,000, although the Circuit Court deemed it proper to
Williams v. Claflin
Williams v. Claflin. The ruling in Jerome v. McCarter (21 Wall. 17), that where, by reason of the changed circumstances of the case, or of the parties, or of the sureties on á supersedeas bond, so that the security, which at the time it was
County of Jasper v. Ballou
County of Jasper v. Ballou. The charter of a railroad company in Illinois allowed counties, &e., to subscribe to the stock of the corporation and issue bonds in payment, if a majority of voters, at an election called by the comty court, sho
Grinnell v. Railroad Co.
Grinnell v. Railroad Company. 1. The grant made to Iowa by the act of May 15,1856, c. 28 (11 Stat. 9), to aid in the construction of a railroad from Davenport to Council Bluffs, is in prcesenti, and, with certain exceptions therein specifie
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.