Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1880 Cases
225 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Williams v. Louisiana
Williams v. Louisiana. In a suit brought, in one of her courts, by the State of Louisiana, seeking to restrain payment on the bonds issued to the New Orleans, Mobile, and Chattanooga Railroad Company, under an act of the legislature approve
Hoyt v. Sprague
Hoyt v. Sprague. Francklyn v. Sprague. 1, If the executor of a deceased partner consents to the surviving partners con tinuing the business with the assets of the firm, bis lien on property thereafter acquired will be postponed to that of c
Babbitt v. Clark
Babbitt v. Clark. 1. Under the act of March 3, 1875, c. 137 (18 Stat., pt. 3, p. 470), a writ of error is the- proper mode for reviewing here the order of the Circuit Court remanding an action at law' removed thereto from a State court, and
Kennedy v. Indianapolis
Kennedy v. Indianapolis. I Sect, 7, art. 1, of the Constitution of Indiana, adopted in 1816, provides “that no man’s particular services shall be demanded, or property taken or applied to public use, without the consent of his representativ
Swan v. Arthur
Swan v. Arthur. Fleitman v. Arthur. Flegenheim v. Arthur. Laces, cigar ribbons, galloons, and braids made substantially of silk, although ' . cotton forms a part thereof, were subject to a duty of sixty per cent ad valorem, under sect. 8 of
United States v. Quigley
United States v. Quigley. A., a merchant residing in Georgia, left there at the commencement of the rebellion, and, until its close, remained in loyal territory. On leaving, he intrusted his business to an agent, who, with money collected o
Adam v. Norris
Adam v. Norris. 1. A patent issued upon a confirmed Mexican grant is in the nature of a conveyance by way of quitclaim. It is conclusive only as between the parties thereto, and is evidence that, as against the United States, the validity o
Jarrolt v. Moberly
Jarrolt v. Moberly. 1. The act of the General Assembly of Missouri, approved March 18, 1871, Which provides that “it shall be lawful for the council of any city, or the trustees of any incorporated town, to purchase lands, and to donate, le
Ashburner v. California
Ashburner v. California. The statute of California, approved April 15, 1880, limiting to lour years the terms of office of the commissioners required by the act of Congress of June 30,1864. c. 184 (13 Stat. 825), “ to be appointed by the ex
Harter v. Kernochan
Harter v. Kernochan. 1. A township in Illinois and a taxpayer thereof, on behalf of himself and other resident taxpayers, filed their bill in a court of that State against certain State, county, and township officers and the “ unknown owner
County of Ouachita v. Wolcott
County of Ouachita v. Wolcott. 1. Warrants issued by a county in Arkansas are not negotiable paper in the sense of the law merchant. 2. Where the county court has fixed, -by its order, a time for calling in the warrants for redemption, clas
Supervisors v. Kennicott
Supervisors v. Kennicott. 1. A stipulation, signed by the parties or their attorneys, and filed with the clerk of the Circuit Court, submitting a civil cause for trial on an agreed statement of facts, is “ a stipulation in writing waiving a
Dubuclet v. Louisiana
Dubuclet v. Louisiana. A fault instituted to try the title of a party to a State office, whereof he is the incumbent, and whereto he was, by the constituted authorities of the State, duly declared to be elected pursuant to her laws, cannot
Insurance Co. v. Nelson
Insurance Company v. Nelson. A suit was brought to foreclose a mortgage made by husband and wife of land, a part of which belonged to him and a part to her. Her answer sets up that he obtained her signature by physical violence, and that he
The "Richmond."
The “Richmond.” 1. Where in a case in admiralty the decree below, determining the liability of the respective vessels in a collision, was rendered-before the act of Feb. 16, 1875, c. 77 (18 Stat., pt. 3, p. 315), took effect, this court, th
County of Tipton v. Locomotive Works
County of Tipton v. Locomotive Works. 1. A general statute of Tennessee required the county courts, when thereunto au* thorized by a popular vote at an election held for the purpose, to subscribe for stock in a railroad company. A special s
Dennison v. Alexander
Dennison v. Alexander. A judgment or a. decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia cannot be re-examined here, unless the matter .in dispute, exclusive of costs, exceeds the value of $2,600. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the
Louisiana v. New Orleans
Louisiana v. New Orleans. A cause, not presenting questions entitling it to precedence, will not, over the objection of a party thereto, be advanced in order that it may he heard with another case standing before it on the docket. Error to
Green v. Fisk
Green v. Fisk. Upon a petition filed by A., alleging that he was the owner of an undivided half of certain real estate which was not susceptible of a division, and praying for a partition thereof by sale, the court below decreed that he was
Water-works Co. v. Barret
Water-works Company v. Barret. 1. An order made by the court below, pursuant to the consent of parties, a binding upon them here. 2. A company who, under a contract with a city, was constructing water-works, executed a mortgage on them, to
County of Morgan v. Allen
County of Morgan v. Allen. 1. Where a county subscribed to the capital stock of a railway company, and issued its bonds therefor, the creditors of the company, on its becoming insolvent, are entitled to enforce the liability of the county o
Dietzsch v. Huidekoper
Dietzsch v. Huidekoper. 1. Kern v. Huidekoper (supra, p. 485) cited and approved. 2. After the plaintiff removed to the proper Circuit Court of the United States a suit in replevin brought in a State court, the latter proceeded to try it an
Kern v. Huidekoper
Kern v. Huidekoper. 1. A party to a suit, who, under the act of March 3,1875, c. 137 (18 Stafc, pt. 3, p. 470), was entitled to its removal from the State court wherein it was brought, filed in due time his petition and the requisite bond,
Thompson v. United States
Thompson v. United States. 1. To a petition for a mandamus, to compel A., the clerk of a township, to whom had been delivered a certified copy.of a judgment recovered against it to certify the judgment to the supervisor in order that'the am
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.