Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1882 Cases
192 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rogers v. Durant
Rogers v. Durant. 1. 'The loss of a draft is not sufficiently proved, to support a suit in equity thereon against the drawer or acceptor, by evidence that it was left with a referee appointed by order of court to examine and report claims a
United States v. Harris
United States v. Harris. 1. The omission to state, in the certificate of division of opinion between the judges of tlie Circuit Court in a criminal proceeding, that the point of difference is ■ certified “ upon the request of either party o
Russell v. Williams
Russell v. Williams. 1. Section 21 of the act of July 14,1870, c. 255, which provided that, in lieu of the duties then imposed by law, certain duties specified should' thereafter be imposed on certain enumerated articles, did not repeal, as
County of Madison v. Warren
County of Madison v. Warren. Where, in a case tried by the court below, thé record does not affirmatively show a written stipulation waiving^, jury, the questions decided at the trial cannot be re-examined here on a writ of error. Ebbob to
United States v. Wilson
United States v. Wilson. Certificates of indebtedness issued by á person or a corporation are not taxable as “ circulation,” under sect. 3408, Rev. Stat., unless they were calculated or intended to circulate or to be used as money. Appeal f
Albright v. Teas
Albright v. Teas. A suit, the parties thereto being citizens of the same State, was brought in a court thereof, for moneys alleged to be due to the complainant under a contract whereby certain letters-patent granted to him were transferred
Porter v. United States
Porter v. United States. 1. Bounty was not allowed by the act of Congress of June 30,1864, c. 174, where vessels of the enemy were, during the rebellion, destroyed by the combined action of the sea and land forces of the United States. 2. P
Weeth v. New England Mortgage Co.
Weeth v. New England Mortgage Company. Where the judges below are opposed in opinion, this court will not take jurisdiction of the case, if their certificate, instead of being confined to single points of law, presents either questions of f
Red Rock v. Henry
Red Rock v. Henry. 1. A statute is not'repealed by a later affirmative statute, which contains no repealing clause, unless the conflict between them cannot be reconciled, or the later covers the same ground as the former, and is clearly int
Pray v. United States
Pray v. United States. A. was appointed occasional weigher and measurer, at a fixed compensation per annum when employed. He rendered accounts for liis services eacli month, Sundays being deducted; was paid on that basis, and gave his recei
Thompson v. Perrine
Thompson v. Perrine. 1. Thompson v. Perrine, 103 U. S. 806, cited and reaffirmed. 2. Overdue coupons detached from a municipal bond which, has not matured are negotiable by the law merchant. 3. Where coupons are payable to bearer, the right
Hayden v. Manning
Hayden v. Manning. Under the act of March 3, 1876, c. 137, the Circuit Court should dismiss a suit where the name of the complainant who has no real interest in the subject- . matter ¡thereof, has been improperly and collusively used for th
Pace v. Alabama
Pace v. Alabama. Section 4189 of the Code of Alabama, prohibiting a white person and a negro from living with each other in adultery or fornication, is not in conflict witli the Constitution of the United States, although it prescribes pena
Elgin v. Marshall
Elgin v. Marshall. 1. Judgment was rendered by the Circuit Court for $1,660.75 against a town, on interest coupons detached from bonds which it had issued under a statute, the unconstitutionality of which it set up as a defence. The bonds w
Adams v. Crittenden
Adams v. Crittenden. 1. Distinct decrees in favor of or against distinct parties cannot be joined to render the aggregate sum sufficient to give this court jurisdiction. 2. Except in special cases, this court lias no jurisdiction to re-ex-a
Jenkins v. International Bank
Jenkins v. International Bank. 1. Where a judgment in a State court is rendered against one shortly thereafter declared to be a bankrupt, a writ of error to that judgment brought by his assignee is a suit, within the meaning of section 5057
Savannah v. Jesup
Savannah v. Jesup. 1. Where a foreclosure suit was brought, and. the municipal corporation within which the mortgaged property was situate was allowed to intervene and setup a claim for taxes thereon— Held, that the order of the Circuit Cou
Merchants' Bank v. Slagle
Merchants’ Bank of Pittsburgh v. Slagle. Where the trustees of a bankrupt who were appointed under sect. 6103 of the ■Revised' Statutes distributed the proceeds of the sale of his property pursuant to an ordér entered by the proper District
Turner v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
Turner v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company. A suit for the foreclosure of a mortgage commenced in a State court was removed to the Circuit Court, where a motion to remand it was made and overruled. A final decree in favor of the complainant
Pierce v. Indseth
Pierce v. Indseth. 1. Judicial notice is taken of the- seal of a notary public, and such seal, impressed upon either tire paper or the wax thereunto attached, entitles his certificate of protest to full faith and credit. So hold, where, in
Miller v. Lancaster Bank
Miller v. Lancaster Bank. Where a party sues out a writ of error-to a State court, this court has no jurisdiction to re-examine the judgment or -the decree, although it be adverse to the Eederal right, if he set up and claimed the right, no
Detroit v. Dean
Detroit v. Dean. A stockholder of a corporation, in order to protect its rights and property against the threatened action of a third party, filed his bill against the latter and the corporation, alleging, inter alia, that the directors, al
United States v. Denvir
United States v. Denvir. An officer charged with the disbursement of public moneys is not liable for interest thereon, if he has not converted them to his own use, nor neglected to disburse them pursuant to law, nor, when thereunto required
Shelton v. Van Kleeck
Shelton v. Van Kleeck. 1. The only questions open for examination on a bill of review for errors of law appearing on the face of the record are such as arise on the pleadings, proceedings, and decree;,without reference to the evidence in th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.