Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1885 Cases
266 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Ackley School District v. Hall
ACKLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT v. HALL. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF IOWA. Argued December 2, 3, 1884. — Decided January 19, 1885. A municipal bond, issued under the'authority of law, for the payment,- at a
Steele v. United States
STEELE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FKOM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted December 22,1884. — Decided January 19, 1885. A private sale of old material arising from the breaking up of a vessel of war, made by an officer of the Navy Department to a
Findlay v. McAllister
FINDLAY v. McALLISTER & Others. IN ERROR TO. THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted December 3, 1884. — Decided January 13, 1885. The confederating together of divers persons with a purpose o
Griffith v. Godey
GRIFFITH v. GODEY & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued December 15, 1884. — Decided January 12, 1885. A probate settlement of an administrator’s account does not conclude as to
Polleys v. Black River Improvement Co.
POLLEYS v. BLACK RIVER IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. IN EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COUET OF WISCONSIN FOE THE COUNTY OF LACROSSE. Submitted November 17, 1884. — Decided January 12, 1885. In' error to a Scate court, the writ may be directed to an inferior
Bryan v. Kennett
BRYAN & Others v. KENNETT & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued December 12, 1884. — Decided January 6, 1885. The term “property,” in the treaty by which the United State
Central Railroad & Banking Co. v. Pettus
CENTRAL RAILROAD & BANKING COMPANY OF GEORGIA v. PETTUS & Others. ■APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF AL A HAMA. Argued April 14, 15, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. Certain unsecured creditors of
Rowell v. Lindsay
ROWELL & Another v. LINDSAY & Another. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. Argued December 15, 16, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. A patent for a combination of separate parts does not
Pullman Palace Car Co. v. Speck
PULLMAN PALACE CAR COMPANY & Others v. SPECK & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted December 18,1884. \Decided January 5, 1885. Within the meaning of § 3, act of March
Hess v. Reynolds
HESS v. REYNOLDS, Administrator. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT'COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Submitted. December 9, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. A proceeding in a State court against an administrator, to obt
Hollister v. Benedict & Burnham Manufacturing Co.
HOLLISTER, Collector, v. BENEDICT & BURNHAM MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. Argued November 11, 19, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. Novelty and increased utility in
Drennen v. London Assurance Co.
DRENNEN & Others v. LONDON ASSURANCE COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. Submitted December 2,1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. An agreement by the members of a firm to admit a person in
Davison v. Von Lingen
DAVISON & Another v. VON LINGEN & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Argued December 12, 1884. —Decided January 5, 1885. A stipulation in the charter-party of a steamer, that she is “now
Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamship Co. v. Commissioners of Emigration
LIVERPOOL, NEW YORK AND PHILADELPHIA STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. COMMISSIONERS OF EMIGRATION. IN ERROR' TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW' YORK. Argued March 24, 25, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. In an a
Barbier v. Connolly
BARBIER v. CONNOLLY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted November 25, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. A municipal ordinance prohibiting from washing and ironing in public l
Head v. Amoskeag Manufacturing Co.
HEAD v. AMOSKEAG MANUFACTURING COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE ' OF NEW Hampshire. Argued December 16, 17, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. A statute of a State, authorizing any person to erect and maintain on Ms own ■la
Cole v. La Grange
COLE v. LA GRANGE. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Submitted December 8, 1884. — Decided January 5, 1885. The general grant of legislative power in the Constitution of a State does no
Peugh v. Porter
PEUGH v. PORTER & Another. APPEAL PROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. Argued December 17, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. An instrument, by which A, as attorney in fact by substitution, for good consideration, assigns to B an
St. Paul & Duluth Railroad v. United States
ST. PAUL & DULUTH RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL EEOM THE COUET OE CLAIMS. Submitted December 8, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. A voluntary transfer of a claim against the United States by way of mortgage, completed and made abso
St. Paul & Sioux City Railroad v. Winona & St. Peter Railroad
ST. PAUL & SIOUX CITY RAILROAD COMPANY & Another v. WINONA & ST. PETER RAILROAD COMPANY. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MINNESOTA. Argued December 18, 19, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. In grants of lands to aid in building r
Thayer v. Life Ass'n of America
THAYER & Another v. LIFE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA & Others. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Submitted December 16, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. Two citizens of West Virginia conveyed to
Knickerbocker Life Insurance v. Pendleton
KNICKERBOCKER LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PENDLETON & Others. IN ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TENNESSEE. Argued November 11, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. Policy of life insurance being conditio
Whitney v. Morrow
WHITNEY & Another v. MORROW. IN error to the supreme court of THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. Argued December 2, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. When an act of Congress, confirming a claim to land, contains a proviso that the confirmation shall not
Murphy v. Victor Sewing Machine Co.
MURPHY, Administratrix, v. VICTOR SEWING MACHINE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Submitted December 15, 1884. Decided January 5, 1885. A bond by a principal and a surety was conditioned that the principal sh
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.