Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1886 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wylie v. Northampton Bank
WYLIE v. NORTHAMPTON BANK. ERROR TO THE OIROUXT COURT OE THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Argued November 24, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886 The robbery by burglars of securities deposited for safe-keeping in the'
Williamsport Bank v. Knapp
WILLIAMSPORT BANK v. KNAPP. ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Argued November 23, 24, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886. Each question certified to this court upon a division of opinion
Kramer v. Cohn
KRAMER v. COHN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITEÓ STATES FOR ‘THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. Submitted November 12, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886. A bill in equity by an assignee in bankruptcy against the bankrupt and anothe
Buzard v. Houston
BUZARD v. HOUSTON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR' ■ THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. Argued November 2, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886. A court of equity of the United States will not sustain a bill in equity, in a c
Halsted v. Buster
HALSTED v. BUSTER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. Argued November 23, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886. When the jurisdiction of a circuit court of the United States in an action at law de
Donnelly v. District of Columbia
DONNELLY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted November 19, 1886. Decided December 13, 1886. A creditor who receives froln his debtor a negotiable instrument of the debtor for the amount of his debt, and sells
Ker v. Illinois
KER v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. Argued April 27, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. 'A plea to an indictment in a State court, that the defendant has been brought from a foreign country to this country by
United States v. Rauscher
UNITED STATES v. RAUSCHER. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION OF OPINION FROM TTTE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Submitted March 2, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. Apart from the provisions of treaties on th
Coit v. Gold Amalgamating Co.
COIT v. GOLD AMALGAMATING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FÓR ' THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. . Argued November 18, 19, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. Where the charter of a corporation authorizes capita
Pomace Holder Co. v. Ferguson
POMACE HOLDER COMPANY v. FERGUSON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT ■ OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR-THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 19, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. The claim of letters-patent No. 187,100, granted to John Cla
McCreery v. Haskell
McCREERY v. HASKELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. Argued November 12, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. Where, under the .eighth section of the act of July 23d, 1866, “ to quiet land titles in California,” a survey i
Clark v. Wooster
CLARK v. WOOSTER. APPEAL PROM THE CXROUXT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POK THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW1 YORK. Argued November 8, 9, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. If a'suit in equity to restrain from infringing letters patent and to recover
Wood v. Fort Wayne
WOOD v. FORT WAYNE. • ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE; TOOTED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. . Argued November 16, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. In this case, the court construed the language of a written contract for supplying mat
Hamilton v. Vicksburg, Shreveport & Pacific Railroad
HAMILTON v. VICKSBURG, SHREVEPORT & PACIFIC RAILROAD. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OE THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Argued November 10, 1886. Decided December 6, 1886. .Whenever the exercise of a right, conferred by law for the benefit of the ' pub
New Orleans v. Houston
NEW ORLEANS v. HOUSTON. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCÜIT OOURT OE THE TOUTED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE LOUISIANA. Argued November 17, 18, 1880. Decided December 6, 1886. The service of process in this case having been upon the mayor of New
New York, Lake Erie, & Western Railroad v. Nickals
NEW YORK, LAKE ERIE, AND WESTERN RAILROAD v. NICKALS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT OOUBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 1, 2, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. The Erie Eailway Company, being embarrass
Newhall v. Breton
NEWHALL v. LE BRETON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued November 2, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. The evidence in this case, if admissible, establishes as a fact that the defendant
East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. Grayson
EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA & GEORGIA RAILROAD v. GRAYSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT OOURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. Submitted November 8, 1886, Decided November 29, 1886. A, a citizen oí Alabama, filed a bill in
Continental Insurance v. Rhoads
CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. RHOADS. ERROR:TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES’ ,POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP PENNSYLVANIA. Argued November 9, 10, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. A declaration in an action at law in a Circuit Cour
Hapgood v. Hewitt
HAPGOOD v. HEWITT. APPEAL i?KOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Argued November 10, 11, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. In a suit in equity by the trustees of a dissolved Missouri corporation to compel
Crow v. Oxford
CROW v. OXFORD. ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COURT OP THE' UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP KANSAS. Submitted October 25, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. In a suit on bonds of the same issue as those adjudged to be invalid, in McOlure v. Township
Willamette Manufacturing Co. v. Bank of British Columbia
WILLAMETTE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BANK OF BRITISH COLUMBIA. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Argued November 9, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. It is witliin the power.of a legislature which
Freeman v. Alderson
FREEMAN v. ALDERSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT. OF TEXAS. Argued November 2, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. A personal judgment for costs may not be rendered against tbe defendant, on defaul
Washington County v. Sallinger
WASHINGTON COUNTY v. SALLINGER. I5RR0R TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOB THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE NORTH CAROLINA. Argued November 10, 1886. Decided November 29, 1886. A court-house in North. Carolina being'destroyed by Are, the c
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.