Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1886 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
New York Elevated Railroad v. Fifth National Bank
NEW YORK ELEVATED RAILROAD v. FIFTH NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF'NEW YORK. Submitted October 12, 1886. — Decided November 1, 1886. The value of the matter in dispute in this cou
Little v. Giles
LITTLE & Others v. GILES & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIEOHIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. Submitted October 19, 1886. — Decided November 1, 1886. A suit in a State court against several defendants, some of whom ar
Schmidt v. Cobb
SCHMIDT v. COBB. AI*PEAL FROM THE ÓIROUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF- IOWA. Submitted October 12, 1886. Decided October 25, 1886. A commenced a proceeding in equity in a District Court of Iowa against B for viol
Wabash, St. Louis & Pacific Railway Co. v. Illinois
WABASH, ST. LOUIS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE ILLINOIS. Argued April 14, 15, 1886. — Decided October 25, 1886. A statute of Illinois enacts that, if any railroad company shall, within
Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. Putnam
VICKSBURG AND MERIDIAN RAILROAD COMPANY v. PUTNAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP GEORGIA. Argued April 22, 1886. — Decided October 22, 1886. In an action against a railroad corporation by a pas
Thommessen v. Whitwill
THE GREAT WESTERN. THOMMESSEN & Another v. WHITWILL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued October 19, 20, 1885. — Decided May 10, 1886. The decision in The Oity of Norwich, mite 468
Dyer v. National Steam Navigation Co.
THE SCOTLAND. DYER & Others v. NATIONAL STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued March 12, 13, 1885. — Reargued October 20, 21, 1885, — Decided May 10, 1886. T
Place v. Norwich & New York Transportation Co.
THE CITY OF NORWICH. PLACE & Others v. NORWICH & NEW YORK TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Argued November 16, 17, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. In a ease of co
Morgan's Steamship Co. v. Louisiana Board of Health
MORGAN'S STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. LOUISIANA BOARD OF HEALTH & Another. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OR LOUISIANA. Argued. April 26, 27, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The system of quarantine laws established by statutes of Louisiana
Norton v. Shelby County
NORTON v. SHELBY COUNTY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OE TENNESSEE. Argued March 24, 25, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. This court follows the decisions of the highest court of a State, in construi
San Bernardino County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE. DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued January 27, 28, 29, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. This case differs from Santa Ola/ra County
Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad
SANTA CLARA COUNTY v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CALIFORNIA v. CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CALIFORNIA v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued
United States v. Langston
UNITED STATES v. LANGSTON. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Submitted April 26, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. A statute which fixes the annual salary of a public officer at a designated sum without limitation as to time, is not abrogated or
Francis v. Flinn
FRANCIS & Others v. FLINN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP LOUISIANA. Argued April 20, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. A bill in equity -which alleges that complainant, a citizen of Florida, is p
United States v. Kagama
UNITED STATES v. KAGAMA & Another, Indians. certificate of division in opinion from the circuit court of THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued March 2, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The ninth section of the Indian Appropr
Yick Wo v. Hopkins
YICK WO v. HOPKINS, SHERIFF. WO LEE v. HOPKINS, SHERIFF. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted April 14, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1
Cannon v. United States
CANNON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE UTAH. Decided May 10, 1886. As the court had no jurisdiction in this case, 116 U. S. 55, and it was decided at the present term, the judgment is vacated, the mandate re
Snow v. United States
SNOW v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Argued April 28, 29, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. There is no provision of law under which this court can review a judgment of the Supr
Loring v. Palmer
LORING & Another v. PALMER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ' THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Argued March 18, 19, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. A series of letters and agreements passing between the parties interes
Carson v. Hyatt
CARSON v. HYATT & Another. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Argued April 20, 21, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. An
Mullan v. United States
MULLAN & Another v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. Argued April 1, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. When the authority of the Attorney-General of the United States to commence
Plymouth Gold Mining Co. v. Amador & Sacramento Canal Co.
PLYMOUTH GOLD MINING COMPANY v. AMADOR & SACRAMENTO CANAL COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SAME COURT. Submitted April 26, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. W
Salt Lake City v. Hollister
SALT LAKE CITY v. HOLLISTER, Collector. APPEAL FROM.THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. Argued April 19, 22, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. A municipal corporation engaged in the business of distilling spirits is subject to internal
Libby v. Clark
LIBBY v. CLARK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE KANSAS. Submitted April 19, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The provisions in article YII. of the Treaty of June 24, 1862, with the Ottawa Indians of Blanchard’s Pork and Roche de Boe
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.