Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1886 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Alabama v. Montague
ALABAMA & Others v. MONTAGUE & Another. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE TENNESSEE. Submitted March 31, 1886. Decided April 12, 1886. This case involves tbe same questions as the case just decided,
Alabama v. Montague
ALABAMA & Others v. MONTAGUE & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Submitted March 31, 1886. Decided April 12, 1886. By an act of the Legislature of Alabama the State loaned its
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Southern Express Co.
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN & SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY. MEMPHIS & LITTLE ROCK RAILROAD COMPANY v. SOUTHERN EXPRESS COMPANY. MISSOURI, KANSAS & TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. DINSMORE, PRESIDENT & SHAREHOLDER IN ADAMS EXPR
New York Mutual Life Insurance v. Armstrong
NEW YORK MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ARMSTRONG, Administratrix. ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. Argued March 16, 17, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. A policy oí life insurance payable
Burnes v. Scott
BURNES v. SCOTT & Another, Executors. • ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE western DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Argued March 23, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. In a suit at law, by the payee of a promissory note or- his represen
Dimock v. Revere Copper Co.
DIMOCK v. REVERE COPPER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. Argued March 22, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. A discharge in bankruptcy is no bar to an action on a judgment recovered against the bankrupt after his disc
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Sargent
YALE LOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. SARGENT. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. Argued March 12, 15, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. Claim 1 of reissued letters patent No. 4696, granted to
Ex parte Fonda
EX PARTE FONDA. ORIGINAL. Submitted March 22, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. A petition for a writ of habeas corpus alleged that the petitioner had been convicted in .a Circuit Court of the State of Michigan of embezzling the funds of a Natio
Bruce v. Manchester & Keene Railroad
BRUCE & Another v. MANCHESTER & KEENE RAILROAD. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE . UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF "NEW HAMPSHIRE. Submitted March 22, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. The matter in dispute, on which the jurisdiction of th
Mahomet v. Quackenbush
MAHOMET v. QUACKENBUSH. ERROR TO THE CIROUIT COURT OF THE HNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Submitted March 8, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. The requirement of the Constitution of Illinois that “no private or local law whi
Turpin v. Burgess
TURPIN & Another v. BURGESS, Collector. ERROR TO THE OIRCUIT COÜRT OR THE UNITED ’STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. Argued March 18, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. The exportation stamp required to be affixed to every package of to
Dingley v. Oler
DINGLEY & Another v. OLER & Another. OLER & Another v. DINGLEY & Another. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MAINE. Argued March 8, 9, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. D, a dealer in ice, finding himself late in
Ferguson v. Arthur
FERGUSON v. ARTHUR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued March 24, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. Under §2504, Schedule M. of the Revised Statutes (p. 480, 2d ed.), “Henry’s Calcined Ma
Union Trust Co. v. Illinois Midland Railway Co.
UNION TRUST COMPANY v. ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY. BORG & Another v. ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY. WARING & Others v. UNION TRUST COMPANY. FLETCHER & Others v. ILLINOIS MIDLAND RAILWAY COMPANY & Another. • APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT
Stone v. South Carolina
STONE v. SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. Argued March 5, 1886 Decided April 5, 1886. A. State court is not bound to surrender its jurisdiction oí a suit on petition for removal, until a ease has be
Knapp v. Homeopathic Mutual Life Insurance
KNAPP v. HOMEOPATHIC MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE ' CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ’MASSACHUSETTS. Submitted March 16, 1886. Decided April 5, 1886. A policy of insurance, made to a wife on the life of
District of Columbia v. McElligott
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. McELLIGOTT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued March 4, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. A supervisor of county roads in the District of Columbia was repairing them . with a force of laborers
Hobbs v. McLean
HOBBS, Assignee, v. McLEAN & Another. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE, SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP IOWA Argued March 17, 18, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. Where three persons form a partnership, and agree to bear the los
Yale Lock Manufacturing Co. v. Greenleaf
YALE LOCK MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. GREENLEAF. APPEAL FEQM.THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE' SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued March 16, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. The scope of letters patent must be limited to the inven
New York Life Insurance v. Fletcher
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. FLETCHER. ■ ERROR TO THE OIRCÜIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOURI. Argued March 19, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. A person applied in St. Louis to an agent of a New York Insu
Littlefield v. Trustees of the Internal Improvement Fund of Florida
LITTLEFIELD v. TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROVEMENT FUND OF FLORIDA. REED v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Argued March 9, 10, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. ' On the facts :
Sioux City & St. Paul Railroad v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
SIOUX CITY & ST. PAUL RAILROAD COMPANY & Others v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. SIOUX CITY & ST. PAUL RAILROAD COMPANY & Others. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED
Kerr v. South Park Commissioners
KERR & Others v. SOUTH PARK COMMISSIONERS. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE NORTHERN- DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. Argued January 21, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. The subject-matter in controversy in this suit is dispose
Kerr v. South Park Commissioners
KERR & Others v. SOUTH PARK COMMISSIONERS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCÜIT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS! Argued January 21, 1886. Decided March 29, 1886. A jury being empanelled on the law side of the court belo
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.