Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1886 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Evans v. Pike
EVANS & Another v. PIKE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OR THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OR LOUISIANA. Argued April 32, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. In Louisiana a gratuitous donee of land bought by the donor on credit at a'l sher
United States v. Central Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Argued April 29, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The act of July, 1, 1862, “to aid in the construction of a railroad and telegraph line from the Missouri Rive
United States v. Hailey
UNITED STATES v. HAILEY, Administrator. FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF IDAHO. Submitted April 7, 1883. — Decided May 10, 1886. The proper way to bring up for review a cause tried before a jury in a Territory is by writ of error.
Wells v. Wilkins
WELLS & Others v. WILKINS. GOLDSTUCKER & Another v. SAME. WELLS & Others v. SAME. WELLS & Others v. SAME. WELLS & Others v. SAME. WELLS & Another v. SAME. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA.
Johnson v. Wilkins
JOHNSON & Another v. WILKINS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. Submitted April 26, 1886. Decided May 10, 1886. The cause was submitted, under Rule 20, January 7, 1886. The oourt finding n
Hartranft v. Du Pont
HARTRANFT v. DU PONT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE PENNSYLVANIA. Submitted April 19, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The Repauno was a wooden vessel 37 feet in length at the water line, 8 feet be
Hunt v. Oliver
HUNT & Another v. OLIVER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. Argued April 5, 6, 7, 1888. — Decided May 10, 1886. On the voluminous facts in this case, which are referred to at length in
Arrowsmith v. Harmoning
ARROWSMITH v. HARMONING, Administratrix & Others. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. Submitted April 26, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. This court has jurisdiction, in error, over a judgment of the Supreme Court of a State when
Gardner v. Herz
GARDNER & Others v. HERZ & Another. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued April 19, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. Claim 2 of reissued letters patent No. 9094, granted to William Gar
Graham v. Boston, Hartford & Erie Railroad
GRAHAM & Another v. BOSTON, HARTFORD & ERIE RAILROAD COMPANY & Others. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Argued April 15, 16, 19, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. The Boston, Hartford & Brie
Paine v. Central Vermont Railroad
PAINE v. CENTRAL VERMONT RAILROAD COMPANY. error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF VERMONT. Argued April 8, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. In an action in the Circuit Court of the United States, submitted by stipu
Hopper v. Covington
HOPPER v. COVINGTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. Argued April 21, 1886. — Decided May 10, 1886. In an action upon a negotiable bond issued by a town authorized by the public laws of the State
Pennsylvania Railroad v. St. Louis, Alton & Terre Haute Railroad
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY & Others v. ST. LOUIS, ALTON & TERRE HAUTE RAILROAD COMPANY. ST. LOUIS, ALTON & TERRE HAUTE RAILROAD COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY & Others. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TH
Iron Silver Mining Co. v. Elgin Mining & Smelting Co.
IRON SILVER MINING COMPANY v. ELGIN MINING & SMELTING COMPANY & Others. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. Argued March 26, 29, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. Under sections 3320, 3822, and 2324 o
Conley v. Nailor
CONLEY v. NAILOR & Others. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Argued April 12, 13, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. In equity, each caso to set aside a deed for incapacity of the grantor, or intoxication at the time o
United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA & ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED ’ STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Argued April 15, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. The statute of limitations of a St
Ex parte Lothrop
EX PARTE LOTHROP. ORIGINAL. Argued April 12, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. The County Court in the County of Cochise, created and established by the Legislature of Arizona by the act of March 12, 1885, is an inferior court within the mean
Southern Pacific Railroad v. California
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME OOURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Submitted December 11, 1885. — Decided April 26, 1886. The question whether a State has power to tax franchises of a corporation derived
Clay v. Freeman
CLAY & Another v. FREEMAN & Another. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP MISSISSIPPI. Submitted January 12, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. The surviving partner of a partnership after payment of
Spraigue v. Thompson
SPRAIGUE & Others v. THOMPSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. Argued April 5, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. Section 1513 of the code of Georgia which provides that “ any person, master, or commander of a ship or vesse
United States v. Wilson
UNITED STATES v. WILSON. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OP TENNESSEE. Argued April 15, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. A bill quia timet to remove a cloud from a legal title cannot ordinarily be b
Cadman v. Peter
CADMAN v. PETER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF .THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. Aigued April 13, 14, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. If a deed of land is in fee, with a covenant of warranty, and there is no defeas
Hart v. United States
HART v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Argued March 25, 1886. — Decided April 26, 1886. Under section V of the act of June 25, 1868, ch. 71, 15 Stat. 76, the Secretary of War transmitted a claim against the United States to
Mexican Construction Co. v. Reusens
MEXICAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. REUSENS. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A SUIT PENDING IN ERROR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Submitted April 12, 1886. — Decided April 23, 1886. The discretion which
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.