Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1888 Cases
293 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brodnax v. Ætna Insurance
BRODNAX v. ÆTNA INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIECHIT OOURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE . THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 61. Argued November 1, 1888. Decided November 19, 1888. The provision in § 1783 of the Code of Georgia, (eel.
United States v. Knox
UNITED STATES v. KNOX. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 1209. Submitted November 5, 1888. Decided November 19, 1888. The Court of Claims has jurisdiction to hear and determine a claim of a commissioner of-a Circuit Court of the United S
Estis v. Trabue
ESTIS v. TRABUE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 50. Argued aud submitted October 31, 1888. Decided November 19, 1888. A writ of error, in which both the plaintiff’s in error an
Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad
JONES v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE' EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 58. Argued November 2, 1888. Decided November 12, 1888. When, in an. action by an em
United States v. American Bell Telephone Co.
UNITED STATES v. AMERICAN BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 846. Argued October 9, 10, 1888. Decided November 12, 1888. A bill in equity which, assails two pate
Ex parte Terry
EX PARTE TERRY. ORIGINAL. No. 6. Original. Submitted, October 18.1888. Decided November 12, 1888. This court is not required to exercise the power conferred upon it by Rev. .Stat. §§ 751-753, to inquire upon writ of habeas eorpvs into the c
Ridings v. Johnson
RIDINGS v. JOHNSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT .OF THE UNITED ^STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 44. Submitted October 29, 1888. Decided November 12, 1888. When a bill in equity is dismissed by the court below on a genera
Central Bank of Washington v. Hume
CENTRAL BANK OF WASHINGTON v. HUME. HUME v. CENTBAL BANK OF WASHINGTON. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 29, 30. Argued October 17, 18, 1888. Decided November 12, 1888. It is a general rule that a life-insura
Jaehne v. New York
JAEHNE v. NEW YORK. APPEAL'. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1409. Argued October 29,1888. Decided November 12, 1888. A general law for the punishment of offences which endeavors by ret
Bundy v. Cocke
BUNDY v. COCKE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THH DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 42. Argued and submitted October 29,1884 Decided November 12, 1888. A bill in equity, filed in Kentucky, by the receiver of a national bank
Johnson v. Christian
JOHNSON v. CHRISTIAN. .-APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 15. Submitted October 12, 1888. Decided November 5, 1888. When a person, who has been in the habit of dealing with an agent
Liggett & Myers Tobacco Co. v. Finzer
LIGGETT AND MYERS TOBACCO COMPANY v. FINZER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE' DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 39. Argued October 24,1888. Decided November 5, 1888. On the proofs the court holds: (1) That the complainant
Lovejoy v. United States
LOVEJOY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 34. Submitted October 18-23,1888. Decided November 5, 1888. The act of June 30, 1879, c. 52, § 2, prescribing the mode of drawing ju
Crescent Brewing Co. v. Gottfried
CRESCENT BREWING CO. v. GOTTFRIED. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 35. Argued October 19, 22, 23, 1888. Decided November 5, 1888. Claim 1 of letters patent No. 42,580, granted.May 3d, 1864
Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. Smith
GEORGIA RAILROAD AND BANKING COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP GEORGIA. No. 28. Argued October 16, 17, 1888. Decided October 29, 1888. The incorporation of a railroad company by a State, the granting to it of spec
Culliford v. Gomila
CULLIFORD v. GOMILA. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 33. Argued October 18, 19, 1888. Decided October 29, 1888. -A charter-party, containing a guaranty by the owner of the vessel
Chappell v. Bradshaw
CHAPPELL v. BRADSHAW ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1037. Submitted October 22, 1888. Decided October 29, 1888. To give this court jurisdiction to review the judgment of a state court under § 709, Rev. Stat. bec
Asher v. Texas
ASHER v. TEXAS. errob to the court of Appeals of the state of texas. No. 781. Argued October 11, 12, 1888. Decided October 29, 1888. A State law exacting a license tax to enable a person within the State, to solicit orders and make sales th
Livingston County v. First National Bank
LIVINGSTON COUNTY, MISSOURI v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF PORTSMOUTH, NEW HAMPSHIRE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT -COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOURI.' No. 195. Submitted October 9, 1888. Decided October 29, 1888. Ih this e
Williams v. Conger
WILLIAMS v. CONGER. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 105 of October Term, 1887. — Decided October 22, 1888. A renewal of an application for a rehearing after the close of the term at wh
Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. Alabama
NASHVILLE, CHATTANOOGA AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY v. ALABAMA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No 990. Argued October 11, 1888. Decided October 22, 1888. A State statute which requires locomotive engineers and other persons, e
Kane v. Northern Central Railway Co.
KANE v. NORTHERN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE CIRCUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE BASTEEN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 8. Submitted October 12, 1888 Decided October 22, 1888. In an action by an employé of a railroad company
Robinson v. Fair
ROBINSON v. FAIR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE CALIFORNIA. No. 18. Argued April 9, 10, 1888. Decided.October 22, 1888. The State Constitution in force in California prior to 1880 authorized the legisla
United States ex rel. Dunlap v. Black, Commissioner of Pensions
UNITED STATES ex rel. DUNLAP v. BLACK, COMMISSIONER OF PENSIONS. UNITED STATES ex rel. ROSE v. SAME. UNITED STATES ex rel. MILLER v. SAME. ERROR TO THE .SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 991, 992, 993. Argued October 12, 1888.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.