Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1888 Cases
293 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 56. Submitted October 18, 1888. Decided October 22, 1888. On the authority of Telegraph Co. v. Texas, 105 U. S. 460, and Ratterman
Leather Manufacturers' Bank v. Merchants' Bank
LEATHER MANUFACTURERS’ BANK v. MERCHANTS’ BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 10. Argued December 2, 5, 1887. Decided October 22, 1888. If a bank, upon which a check is drawn paya
Kidd v. Pearson
KIDD v. PEARSON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 779. Argued and submitted April 4, 1888. Decided October 22, 1888. Following Mugler v. Kansas, 123 U. S. 623; Held, that a State has the right to prohibit or restrict the
Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Insurance Co. of North America
Liverpool and Great Western Steam Company v. Insurance Company of North America. No. 6. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of New York.
Currie v. United States ex rel. Jacobs
Currie, Mayor, v. United States ex rel. Jacobs. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Louisiana. No. 107.
Rose v. Black
No. 992, Rose v. Black.
Dunlap v. Black
No. 991. Dunlap v. Black.
Craig v. Leitensdorfer
CRAIG v. LEITENSDORFER. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CAUSE ADJUDGED IN THIS COURT AT THE PRESENT TERM. No. 1. Submitted April 23, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. This court has power, and it is its duty, to issue writs of attachment, for costs here aga
In re Coy
IN RE COY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 1395. Argued April 16, 17, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. The acts of Congress and the statutes of Indiana make it a criminal offence for an inspect
Sewall v. Haymaker
SEWALL v. HAYMAKER. error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 244. Argued April 20, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. Under the statutes of Virginia, which were in force in September, 1837, and equally
Mahon v. Justice
MAHON v. JUSTICE. ■APPEAL- PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE' UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP KENTUCKY. No. 1411. Argued April 23, 24, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. No mode is provided by the Constitution and laws of the United States by which
Nickerson v. Nickerson
NICKERSON v. NICKERSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 881. Submitted January 6, 1888. —Decided May 14, 1888. On the proof in this case the court holds that the plaintiff has failed to show such an agreement
Travellers' Insurance v. McConkey
TRAVELLERS’ INSURANCE COMPANY v. McCONKEY. EBEOE TO THE CIECUIT COUET OE THE UNITED STATES EOE THE NOETHEEN DISTEICT OE IQWA: No. 273. Argued May 2, 1888 —Decided May 14, 1888. In an action upon a policy of insurance by which the insurer ag
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Newman
FARMERS’ LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. NEWMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 253. Argued April 25, 26, 1888. —Decided May 14, 1888. The receiver in a suit for tbe foreclosure of a r
Leloup v. Port of Mobile
LELOUP v. PORT OF MOBILE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 274. Submitted May 2, 1888. — Decided May 14, 1888. Where a telegraph company is doing the business of transmitting messages between different States, and has
Calhoun v. Lanaux
CALHOUN v. LANAUX. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 239. Submitted April 19, 1888. —Decided May 14, 1888. The appointment by a Circuit Court of the United States of a receiver of a corporation organized under the la
Robbins v. Rollins's Executors
ROBBINS v. ROLLINS’S EXECUTORS. ROLLINS’S EXECUTORS v. ROBBINS. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 237, 861. Argued April 18, 19, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. Analyzing the contract which is the subject of litig
St. Romes v. Levee Steam Cotton Press Co.
ST. ROMES v. LEVEE STEAM COTTON PRESS COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 139. Argued January 20, 1888. —Decided May 14, 1888. If, after transfer by the plaintiff of the sub
Robertson v. Downing
ROBERTSON v. DOWNING. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 267. Argued April 27, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. Under Rev. Stat. § 2907, and the act of June 22, 1874, c. 391, 18 Stat. 186,
Falk v. Moebs
FALK v. MOEBS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 243. Argued April 20, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. A promissory note which reads: “ Four months after date we promise to pay to the orde
Allen v. Gillette
ALLEN v. GILLETTE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT ‘COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 277. Argued and Submitted May 3, 1888. — Decided May 14, 1888. The principle that a trustee may purchase the trust property at a j
Brown v. District of Columbia
BROWN v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 224. Submitted April 13, 1888. —Decided May 14, 1888. A proposition to pave streets in a municipality, made in writing hy a contractor to the head of a board consisting of
Arthur's Executors v. Vietor
ARTHUR’S EXECUTORS v. VIETOR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 268. Argued May 2, 3, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. Hosiery, composed, of wool and cotton, was imported in 1873. The coll
Flower v. Detroit
FLOWER v. DETROIT. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 203. Argued April 3, 1888. Decided May 14, 1888. Claim 1 of reissued letters patent No. 6990, granted March 14, 1876, to ThomasR
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.