Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1889 Cases
253 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Thomas
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. THOMAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF .THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 1086. Submitted October 28, 1889. Decided November 18, 1889. This court has jurisdiction to review, on writ of error, a de
Anthony v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
ANTHONY v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. error to the circuit court of the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 77. Argued and submitted November 7, 1889; Decided November 18, 1889. An exception to the refusa
Merritt v. Tiffany
MERRITT v. TIFFANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEAV YORK. No. 60. Argued November 4,18S9. Decided November 18, 1889. The “ professional productions of a statuary or of a sculptor only,” as
Watson v. Cincinnati, Indianapolis, St. Louis & Chicago Railway Co.
WATSON v. CINCINNATI, INDIANAPOLIS, ST. LOUIS AND CHICAGO RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 48. Argued October 31,1889. Decided November 18, 1889. TJie improvement in grai
Robertson v. Glendenning
ROBERTSON v. GLENDENNING. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 55. Argued November'4,1889. Decided November 18, 1889. When an article is designated in a tariff act by a specific name, an
Glenn v. Sumner
GLENN v. SUMNER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIH WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 67. Argued November 5, 1889. Decided November 18, 1889. When the answer, in an action at .law, both denies the plaintiffs alle
Boylan v. Hot Springs Railroad
BOYLAN v. HOT SPRINGS RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO. THE • CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1140. Submitted October 31,1SS9. Decided November 11, 1889. The purchaser from a railroad company, at a re
First National Bank v. Morgan
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHARLOTTE v. MORGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 50. Argued November 1, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. The exemption of national banks from suits- in state courts m counties other
Cross v. North Carolina
CROSS v. NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF. THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 1084. Argued October 22, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. A State is not deprived of jurisdiction over a person who criminally forges a bill of exchang
Smith v. Bolles
SMITH v. BOLLES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 47. Argued October 31, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. In an action in the nature of an action on the case to recover from the defendan
Hill v. Sumner
HILL v. SUMNER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 'DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 763. Submitted October 21, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. When a contract respecting property contains an agreement to be performed by the
Roemer v. Bernheim
ROEMER v. BERNHEIM. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT .COURT OF THE' UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 52. Argued and submitted November 1, 1889.— Decided November 11, 1889. The granting or refusal, absolute or conditional, of
Day v. Fair Haven & Westville Railway Co.
DAY v. FAIR HAVEN AND WESTVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. No. 35. Argued October 23, 24,1889. Decided November 11, 1889. The fourth claim in the reissued letters pat
Keystone Manganese & Iron Co. v. Martin
KEYSTONE MANGANESE AND IRON COMPANY v. MARTIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 51. Argued and submitted November 1, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. A bill in equity prayed for an
Aron v. Manhattan Railway Co.
ARON v. MANHATTAN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 43. Argued October 28, 29, 1889. Decided November 11, 1889. The first five claims of letters patent No. 288,494
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Miller
PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, NO. 2, FOR THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA, STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 36. Argued October 24, 25,.1889. Decided November 11, 1889. Neither the charter of the Pennsylvan
Scotland County v. Hill
SCOTLAND COUNTY v. HILL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 29. Argued April 16,17, 1889. Decided November 4, 1889. The negotiable security of a municipal corporation, invalid in the ha
Thompson v. White Water Valley Railroad
THOMPSON v. WHITE WATER VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE- CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 26. Argued October 21, 1889. Decided November 4, 1889. A mortgage by a railroad company, which covers its
Brush v. Condit
BRUSH v. CONDIT. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 9. Argued October 15, 16, 1889. Decided November 4, 1889. Claims 1, 3, 5 and 6 of reissued letters patent No. 8718, granted May 2
Dent v. Ferguson
DENT v. FERGUSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR ' THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 32. Argued April 23, 21, 1889. Decided October 28, 1889. The petition of a bankrupt in bankruptcy, in which he states under oa
Campbell v. Wade
CAMPBELL v. WADE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 20. Argued October 18,1889. Decided October 28, 1889. The statutes of the State of Texas of July 14,1879, and March 11, 1881, providing for the sale of a portion of the
Jackson v. Allen
JACKSON v. ALLEN. BROWN v. ALLEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 44, 45. Argued October 22, 23, 1889. Decided October 28, 1889. When it appears from the record in this court in a
Robertson v. Frank Bros.
ROBERTSON v. FRANK BROTHERS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNIT ED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 15. Argued October 17,1889. Decided October 28, 1889. The payment- of iponey to a customs official to avoid an
Knox County v. Harshman
KNOX COUNTY v. HARSHMAN. APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 1212. Argued October 15, 1889.— Decided October 28, 1889. An appeal from a decree granting, refusing, or dissolving an inj
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.