Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1889 Cases
253 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Stewart v. Masterson
STEWART v. MASTERSON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE. UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 287. Argued April 25, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. A demurrer to a bill in equity cannot introduce as its support new facts wh
Thompson v. Hubbard
THOMPSON v. HUBBARD. HUBBARD v. THOMPSON. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Nos. 265, 271. Submitted April 17,1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. In this case, it was held, on the facts, tha
United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. Barry
UNITED STATES MUTUAL ACCIDENT ASSOCIATION v. BARRY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 240. Argued April 9, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. A certificate or policy issued by a Mutual Acc
Fowle v. Park
FOWLE v. PARK APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 263. Argued April 17, 1830. — Decided May 13, 1889. A contract relating to a patent medicine which communicates its ingredients in confi
Douglass v. Lewis
DOUGLASS v. LEWIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 226. Argued April 3, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. In construing a covenant in a deed, the words are to be taken moststrongly against the party using them; bu
Abendroth v. Van Dolsen
ABENDROTH v. VAN DOLSEN. ERROR TO THE CITY COURT OF NEW YORK. No. 229. Argued April 12,13, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. The connection of the plaintiff in error with the partnership of Griffith & Wunclram was not a matter in issue in the p
Spalding v. Manasse
SPALDING v. MANASSE. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. VANACKER. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. YANADA. SAME v. FARWELL. SAME v. COHN. EEROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. Nos. 278, 279, 280, 281, 282, 284, 285.
Palmer v. Arthur
PALMER v. ARTHUR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 302. Submitted April 26, 1889. —Decided May 13, 1889. It appearing that the alleged imperfections in the plaintiff’s petition were either ob
United States v. Reilly
UNITED STATES v. REILLY. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1036. Submitted April 9, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. No statute of tlie United States authorizes a commissioner of a Circuit Court to adminis
United States v. Perrin
UNITED STATES v. PERRIN. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1035. Submitted April 9,1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. There is no general right of appeal to this court in criminal cases. United States v. Hal
United States v. Hall
UNITED STATES v. HALL. .CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1084. Argued April 9, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. The statutes of the United States confer upon notaries public no general authority to admini
Terry v. Sharon
TERRY v. SHARON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1462. Submitted April 8, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. In a bill in equity in a Circuit Court of the United States to revive, i
United States v. Davis
UNITED STATES v. DAVIS. UNITED STATES v. SCHOFIELD. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. Nos. 1425, 1420. Submitted April 1, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. An appeal lies to this court from a jud
Allman v. United States
ALLMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 214. Argued March 19, 1889. — Decided May 13, 1839. The “ fifty per centum on the contract as originally let,” to which the power of the Postmaster General to expedite service un
Kennon v. Gilmer
KENNON v. GILMER. GILMER v. KENNON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF MONTANA. Nos. 178, 208. Argued January 80, 31,1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. The denial of a change of venue, moved for on the affidavit of the party’s agent
United States v. Drew
UNITED STATES v. DREW. error to the circuit court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 1061. Argued January 28, 29,1889. — Decided May 13, 1889. United States v. Jones, ante, 1, affirmed and applied to this case.
United States v. Jones
UNITED STATES v. JONES. UNITED STATES v. TAUBENHEIMER. UNITED STATES v. MONTGOMERY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Nob. 1103, 1102, 1482. Argued January 28, 29,1889. Decided May 13, 1889. The
Hill v. Harding
HILL v. HARDING. ' ERRO i TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 253. Submitted-April 16,1889. Decided May 13, 1889. If an attachment of property in an action in a state court is dissolved by •the defendant’s entering into a rec
Michigan Insurance Bank v. Eldred
MICHIGAN INSURANCE BANK v. ELDRED. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE-EASTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. ■ No. 239. Argued April 5, 8, 1889. Decided May 13, 1889. Even before the act of June 1, 1872, c. 255, a provision, in
Jones v. Van Doren
JONES v. VAN DOREN. APPEAL FROM - THE CIRCUIT COURT OF, THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 202. Argued March 14, 1889. Decided May 13, 1889. A bill in equity by a widow to obtain her right of -dower, alleging that she ■" c
Lake County v. Graham
LAKE COUNTY v. GRAHAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 1265. Submitted January 2, 1889. Decided May 13, 1889. Lake County v. Rollins, ante 662, affirmed and applied to the bonds in controver
Lake County v. Rollins
LAKE COUNTY v. ROLLINS. ERROR’ TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 1347. Submitted January 2,1889. Decided May 13, 1889. The .constitution of Colorado of 1876 provided that no county should contract a
District of Columbia v. Cornell
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. CORNELL. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 55. Submitted November 1, 1888. Decided May 13, 1889. Negotiable certificates, issued, by the Board of Public Works of the District of Columbia, redeemed according to law
United States v. Haynes
UNITED STATES v. HAYNES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED ' STATES FOE THE - WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 273. Submitted April 24,-I§89. Decided May 13, 1889. An action on tire official bond of a collector of customs is not one on
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.