Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1889 Cases
253 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Woodstock Iron Co. v. Richmond & Danville Extension Co.
WOODSTOCK IRON COMPANY v. RICHMOND AND DANVILLE EXTENSION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE'- . NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 180. Argued February 1, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. The Richmond and Danville
Insurance Co. of North America v. Guardiola
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. GUARDIOLA. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF JTEW YORK. No. 159. Argued January 9, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. Letters of a shipping agent to his principal ar
Goodwin v. Fox
GOODWIN v. FOX. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 168. Argued January 18, 21, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. By a -written agreement between two parties, one acknowledged that he was
Shotwell v. Moore
SHOTWELL v. MOORE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 1030. Argued January 30, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. 'A State may make the ownership of property subject to taxation, relate to any day or days or period of the year w
United States v. Marshall Silver Mining Co.
UNITED STATES v. MARSHALL SILVER MINING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 17. Argued November 20, 1888. Decided March 5, 1889. When the United States retires, from the prosecution
City National Bank of Fort Worth v. Hunter
CITY NATIONAL BANK OF FORT WORTH v. HUNTER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE TOUTED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 116. Submitted December 10, 1888. Decided March 5, 1889. On the proofs which are reviewed at length in th
Peters v. Hanson
PETERS v. HANSON. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 66. Argued January 25, 28, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. Claims 1, 2 and 3 of letters patent No. 213,529, granted to George M. Peters, Marc
Peters v. Active Manufacturing Co.
PETERS v. ACTIVE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR ' THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 65. Argued January 25, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. 'Claims 1 ancl 2 of letters patent No. 178,463, granted
Kimberly v. Arms
KIMBERLY v. ARMS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 169. Argued January 21, 22, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. It is not within the general province of a master in chan
McKenna v. Simpson
McKENNA v. SIMPSON. EEEOE TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 767. Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. A state court has jurisdiction of am'action brought by an assignee in bank- ■ ruptcy to set aside, as made
Norton v. Commissioners of the Taxing District
NORTON v. COMMISSIONERS OF THE TAXING DISTRICT OF BROWNSVILLE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT .OF 'TENNESSEE. No. 1455. Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. The writ of error being brou
Commissioners of the Taxing District v. Loague
COMMISSIONERS OF THE TAXING DISTRICT OF BROWNSVILLE v. LOAGUE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE western DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 1445. Submitted January 4, 1889. — Decided March 5, 1889. Mandamus lies to compel a pa
Norton v. Board of Commissioners
NORTON v. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF THE TAXING DISTRICT OF BROWNSVILLE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT. OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 1442. Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. A valid power to iss
United States ex rel. Levey v. Stockslager
UNITED STATES ex rel. LEVEY v. STOCKSLAGER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF’ COLUMBIA. No. 1481. Argued January 24, 25, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889. The act approved March 2,1867, c. 208,14 Stat. 635, confirmed to the widow an
Allen v. Smith
ALLEN v. SMITH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT-COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 14. Submitted February 15, 1888. Decided March 5, 1889. In a suit in equity, brought by a judgment creditor, to set aside, as fraud
Liverpool & Great Western Steam Co. v. Phenix Insurance
LIVERPOOL AND GREAT WESTERN STEAM COMPANY v. PHENIX INSURANCE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUTT COURT OF' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Argued November 8, 9, 1887. Decided March 5, 1889. A decree of tlie Circuit Cou
Eastern Railroad v. United States
EASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 134. Argued January 22, 23, 1889. Decided February 4, 1889. Prior, to the expiration, June 30, 1877, of a written contract with a railroad company for carrying
United States v. Corwin
UNITED STATES v. CORWIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 123. Argued December 12, 1888. Decided February 4, 1889. In an action against the sureties on a contractor’s bond to.the United
Bank of Fort Madison v. Alden
BANK OF FORT MADISON v. ALDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIROUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 853. Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided February 4, 1889. A stockholder in an insolvent corporation, who has paid h
Walworth v. Harris
WALWORTH v. HARRIS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 148. Submitted January 7, 1889. Decided February 4, 1889. The lien upon a crop 'of cotton, created by a statute of Arkansas whi
Pinkerton v. Ledoux
PINKERTON v. LEDOUX. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 114. Argued December 7, 1888. Decided February 4, 1889. The report upon a Spanish or Mexican grant by the surveyor general of . New Mexico under the act of
Pattee Plow Co. v. Kingman
PATTEE PLOW COMPANY v. KINGMAN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 88. Argued November 16, 19, 1888. Decided February 4, 1889. The second claim of reissued letters patent No. 6080,
Morley Sewing Machine Co. v. Lancaster
MORLEY SEWING MACHINE COMPANY v. LANCASTER. APPEAL KROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE ' UNITED STATES FOR " TÍ5ÍE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 165. Argued January 11, 1889. Decided February 4, 1889. Claims 1, 2, 8 and 13 of letters patent No.
Ruckman v. Cory
RUCKMAN v. CORY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1199. Submitted January 8, 1889. Decided January 28, 1889. B executed and delivered tb C his bond in 1855 or 1856 to convey to hi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.