Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1889 Cases
253 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gibbs v. Consolidated Gas Co. of Baltimore
GIBBS v. CONSOLIDATED GAS COMPANY OF BALTIMORE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 220. Argued March 19', 20, 1889. Decided April 15, 1889. Courts decline to enforce contracts which impose a re
Captain Jack
CAPTAIN JACK, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 8. Original. Argued March 18, 1889. Decided ApriL 15, 1889. The facts that the petitioner in this case was -sentenced to imprisonment in Ohio, and that the offence was committed within a.judicial dist
Gon-shay-ee
GON-SHAY-EE, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 7. Original.. Argued March 18, 1889. Decided April 15, 1889. The act of March 3, 188'5,-23. Stat. 385, c. 341, § 9, was enacted to transfer to Territorial Courts, established by the United States, the
United States v. Averill
UNITED STATES v. AVERILL. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 23. Argued April 26, 1888. Decided April 15, 1889. Under §§ 823 and 839 of the Revised Statutes, the clerk of a District Court in the Territory of Utah is
Hunt v. Blackburn
HUNT v. BLACKBURN. ORI&INAL MOTION IN A CAUSE APPEALED FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 16. Submitted January 22, 1889. — Decided April 8, 1889. The counsel for appellees having undertake
Shepherd v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
SHEPHERD v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF-'THE. UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 213. Argued March 20, 21, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. To entitle a property owner to recover .for in
Reynes v. Dumont
REYNES v. DUMONT. DUMONT v. FRY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 174, 175. Argued January 23, 24, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. The controversy in this case involves the allowan
Brock v. Northwestern Fuel Co.
BROCK v. NORTHWESTERN FUEL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 210. Argued and submitted March 19,'1889. Decided April 8, 1889. When it does not appear, affirmatively, from the rec
Knowlton v. Watertown
Knowlton v. Watertown, Spalding v. Watertown, No. 199, No. 200. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States' for the Western .-District of Wisconsin. Argued March 13, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. Mr. George P. Miller for plaintiffs in e
Spalding v. Watertown
Spalding v. Watertown, No. 201. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Wisconsin. Argued March 13, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. Mr. George P, Miller for plaintiffs in error. Mr. George W. Bird and Mr. Da
Amy v. Watertown
AMY v. WATERTOWN. (No. 2.) error to the circuit court of the united states for the WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 197. Argued March 13, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. The general rule respecting' statutes of limitation is that the languag
Amy v. Watertown
AMY v. WATERTOWN. (No. 1.) ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 196. Argued March 12, 13, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. Between the' time when the Process Act of May 8, 1792, 1 Stat. 275,
Hammer v. Garfield Mining & Milling Co.
HAMMER v. GARFIELD MINING AND MILLING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY. OF MONTANA. No. 207. Submitted March 15, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. The modes of procedure in Montana being substantially the same at law and in e
United States v. Pile
UNITED STATES v. PILE. CERTIFICATE of division in opinion from the circuit court of THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 206. Argued and submitted March 15, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. The suspension of the execution
Manhattan Bank of Memphis v. Walker
MANHATTAN BANK OF MEMPHIS v. WALKER. WALKER v. MANHATTAN BANK OF MEMPHIS. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP TENNESSEE. Nos. 205, 682. Argued March 14, 15, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. A state ba
United States v. Insley
UNITED STATES v. INSLEY. APPEAL EKOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 221. Argued March 21, 1889. Decided April 8, 1889. In a suit in equity, brought by the United States to redeem a parcel of land in K
Nichols, Shepard & Co. v. Marsh
NICHOLS, SHEPARD AND COMPANY v. MARSH. ORIGINAL MOTION IN A CASE BROUGHT UP BY APPEAL. No. 95. Submitted March 18, 1889. — Decided April 1, 1889. M. filed a bill in equity against S. for tlie infringement of letters patent. S. answered and
Dent v. Ferguson
DENT v. FERGUSON. ORIGINAL MOTION IN AN APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 269. Submitted March 18, 1889. — Decided April 1, 1889. Under the circumstances set forth in the motion pa
Davies v. Miller
DAVIES v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1279. Argued January 14,15, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. The notice of dissatisfaction with the'decision of the collector of custom
Parley's Park Silver Mining Co. v. Kerr
PARLEY’S PARK SILVER MINING COMPANY v. KERR. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 154. Submitted January 8,1889. April 1, 1889. In Utah a complaint which alleges that the plaintiff is owner and in possession, of land,
Botiller v. Dominguez
BOTILLER v. DOMINGUEZ. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE' OE CALIFORNIA. No. 1370. Submitted. January 7,1889. Decided April 1, 1889. If an act of Congress is in conflict with a treaty of the United States . with á Foreign Power, this
Buxton v. Traver
BUXTON v. TRAVER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 211. Submitted March 18, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. No portion of the public domain, unless it be in special cases, not affecting the general rule, is open to sa
Stevens v. Nichols
STEVENS v. NICHOLS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 190. Arguéd March 11, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. A petition for removal which alleges the diverse citizenship of the parties in
District of Columbia v. Emerson
District of Columbia v. Emerson, No. 183. In error to the' District of Columbia. Argued March 6, 1889. Decided April 1, 1889. Mr. A. G. Biddle for plaintiff in error. Mr. S. S. Renkle for defendant.in.error.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.