Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1891 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kaukauna Water Power Co. v. Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co.
KAUKAUNA WATER POWER COMPANY v. GREEN BAY AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF OUTAGAMIE COUNTY, WISCONSIN. No. 65. Argued October 30, November 2, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. If the adjudication of a Federal que
Deseret Salt Co. v. Tarpey
DESERET SALT COMPANY v. TARPEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 96. Argued and submitted November 24, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. The grant of public land to the Central Pacific Railroad Company by the acts of
Martin v. Gray
MARTIN v. GRAY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 1065. Submitted December 7, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. IWhen a person, whose equity of redemption in mortgaged real estate is . forec
Knight v. United States Land Ass'n
KNIGHT v. UNITED STATES LAND ASSOCIATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 824. Argued October 23, 26, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. This court takes-judicial notice of facts concerning the pueblo of San Francis
Trezza v. Brush
Trezza v. Brush. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. No. 1123. Decided December 21, 1891.
McElvaine v. Brush
McELVAINE v. BRUSH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1125. Argued December 7, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. The provisions in the New York Code of Criminal Procedure, (§§ 491,
Simmons v. United States
SIMMONS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1296. Argued December 11, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. When it is made to appear to the court during the trial of a cri
Claassen v. United States
CLAASSEN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 1191. Argued December 10, 11, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. An indictment • on Rev. Stat. § 5209, is sufficient, which
Wauton v. DeWolf
WAUTON v. DeWOLF. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1450. Submitted December 7, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. This court has no jurisdiction over an appeal from a Circuit Cour
Van Stone v. Stillwell & Bierce Manufacturing Co.
VAN STONE v. STILLWELL & BIERCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 113. Submitted November 25, 1891. Decided December 21, 1891. In regard to bills of exceptions F
Maine v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.
MAINE v. GRAND TRUNK RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE MAINE. No. 29. Submitted April 14, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. A state statute which requires every corporation, person or associ
Chever v. Horner
CHEVER v. HORNER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 116. Submitted December 2, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. The plaintiff and the defendant in an action of ejectment in a state court in Colorado both claimed title
Franklin County v. German Savings Bank
FRANKLIN COUNTY v. GERMAN SAVINGS BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 1234. Submitted November 23, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. Where a court, having complete jurisdiction of
New Orleans v. New Orleans Water Works Co.
NEW ORLEANS v. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY. CONERY v. NEW ORLEANS WATER WORKS COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 632, 639. Argued November 2, 3, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. If it appear in a case, b
Hammond v. Johnston
HAMMOND v. JOHNSTON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 114. Argued November 25, 30, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. In an action of ejectment in a state court in Missouri, both parties claimed under the New Madrid ac
Finn v. Brown
FINN v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 106. Argued November 24, 25, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. Fifty shares of the stock of a national bank were transferred to F. on the books
Farnsworth v. Duffner
FARNSWORTH v. DUFFNER. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 69. Argued November 4, 1891. Decided December 14, 1891. In a suit in equity for the rescission of a contract of purchase, and
Hall v. Cordell
HALL v. CORDELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 90. Argued November 12, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. This court is bound by the finding of a jury in an action at law, properly s
Coghlan v. South Carolina Railroad
COGHLAN v. SOUTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY. •APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 47. Argued October 21, 22, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. When a contract for the payment of money at a
Pearce v. Rice
PEARCE v. RICE. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 51. Argued October 26, 27, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. F. owed H. & Co. on account about $22,000. He settled this in part by a
New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. Jopes
NEW ORLEANS AND NORTHEASTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. JOPES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE MISSISSIPPI. No. 104. Argued November 24, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. When a bill of exceptions is sign
Sparhawk v. Yerkes
SPARHAWK v. YERKES. SPARHAWK v. ACKLEY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 56, 57. Argued October 28, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. In December, 1871, Y., who was a member of
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Wright
SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. WRIGHT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 13. Argued April 14,1891. Decided December 7, 1891. The payment, whether voluntary or compulsory, of a tax,
Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co. v. Roberts
CHICAGO, ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND OMAHA RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROBERTS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 1417. Submitted November 16,1891. Decided December 7, 1891. This court hag no jurisdicti
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.