Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1891 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Henderson Bridge Co. v. Henderson City
HENDERSON BRIDGE COMPANY v. HENDERSON CITY. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEALS OE THE STATE OE KENTUCKY. No. 1007. Submitted November 23, 1891. Decided December 7, 1891. In a suit brought in a state court of Kentucky by the city of Henderson, ag
Myers v. Groom Shovel Co.
MYERS v. GROOM SHOVEL COMPANY. .PPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 70. Argued November 4,1891. Decided December 7, 1891. Letters patent No. 208,258, granted September 24, 1878, to
Ferry v. King County
FERRY v. KING COUNTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 1377. Submitted November 23,189Í. Decided December 7, 1891. In an action against the county treasurer of a county in the State of Washington and the sureties o
McLish v. Roff
McLISH v. ROFF. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES COURT FOR THE INDIAN TERRITORY. No. 1158. Submitted October 13,1891. Decided December 7, 1891. Under section 5 of the Act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 Stat..826, “ to establish Circuit Courts of Ap
Smyth v. New Orleans Canal & Banking Co.
SMYTH v. NEW ORLEANS CANAL AND BANKING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF. THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. , No. 75. Submitted November 5,1891. Decided November 23, 1891. The plaintiff in his bill set up in h
Craig v. Continental Insurance
CRAIG v. CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 88. Argued November 6, 9,1891. Decided November 23, 1891. The provisions of § 4283 of the Revised Statutes rel
Thompson v. Baker
THOMPSON v. BAKER. . ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 72. Submitted November 4, 1891. Decided November 16, 1891. A conveyance by a debtor in Texas of his real estate there, m.ade with i
Willcox & Gibbs Sewing Machine Co. v. Ewing
WILLCOX & GIBBS SEWING MACHINE COMPANY v. EWING. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 64. Argued October 29, 1891. Decided November 16, 1891. A contract of agency, which leaves the ag
Johnson v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.
JOHNSON v. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. JOHNSON. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOE • THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. , Nos. 60, 71.
Lau Ow Bew
LAU OW BEW, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 12. Original. Submitted November 2,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. Only questions of gravity and importance should be certified to this court by the Circuit Courts of Appeals, under the provisions of t
Fire Insurance v. Wickham
FIRE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION, LIMITED v. WICKHAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 59. Argued October 28,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. Parol testimony is admissible to show the circu
Patent Clothing Co. v. Glover
PATENT CLOTHING COMPANY, LIMITED, v. GLOVER. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE. SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 52. Argued October'27,1891. Decided November 16, 1891 •Reissued letters patent No. 9616, granted to
Rector v. Lipscomb
RECTOR v. LIPSCOMB. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 40. Argued and submitted October 20,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. Nearly two years after the entry of a decree dismissing a
Rogers v. United States
ROGERS v. UNITED STATES. error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 78. Argued November 5,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. Where an action at law was tried by a District Court without' a jury,
Olcott v. Headrick
OLCOTT v. HEADRICK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 77. Argued and submitted November 5,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. A decree of foreclosure and sale, made by a Circuit Court
Adams v. Bellaire Stamping Co.
ADAMS v. BELLAIRE STAMPING COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE CIECUIT COUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE. THE SOUTHEEN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 50. Argued October 26,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. The alleged invention protected by letters patent No. 50,591,
Cross v. Allen
CROSS v. ALLEN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP OREGON. No. 23. Argued October 13,1891. Decided November 16, 1891. The transfer of an overdue note and mortgage for a valuable consideration to a bona fi
Moline Plow Co. v. Webb
MOLINE PLOW COMPANY v. WEBB. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 1227. Submitted October 19,1891. Decided November 9, 1891. An action was brought upon three promissory notes with interest p
Marshall v. Holmes
MARSHALL v. HOLMES. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 28. Argued April 6, 7, 1891 Decided November 9, 1891. Numerous judgments at law were rendered in the state court in favor of the same pa
Metropolitan National Bank v. Claggett
METROPOLITAN NATIONAL BANK v. CLAGGETT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 1064. -Submitted October 19, 1891. Decided November 9, 1891. When a state bank acting under a statute of the State calls in its circulation iss
Seitz v. Brewers' Refrigerating Machine Co.
SEITZ v. BREWERS’ REFRIGERATING MACHINE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 61. Argued October 29, 1891. decided November 9, 1891. When a contract is couched in terms which impo
Kneeland v. Luce
KNEELAND v. LUCE. (2) APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 39. Argued October 19, 20, 1891. Decided November 9, 1891. In a suit in equity brought against a railroad company, by a judgment credi
Davis v. Patrick
DAVIS v. PATRICK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OE NEBRASKA. No. 984. Argued October 22, 23, 1891, Decided November 9, 1891. In determining whether an alleged promise is or is not a promise to answer for t
Leadville Coal Co. v. McCreery
LEADVILLE COAL COMPANY v. McCREERY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 969. Argued and submitted October 29, 1891. Decided November 9, 1891. When, in pursuance of the jurisdiction confe
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.