Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1891 Cases
306 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Fogg v. Blair
FOGG v. BLAIR. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 135. Argued January 6,1891. Decided March 2, 1891. ■It is the settled doctrine of this court, as well as of the Supreme Court of Mis
Clark v. Bever
CLARK v. BEVER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 116. Argued December 15, 16, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. In 1872, an Iowa railroad corporation, being indebted to a construction company
Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.
CHICAGO, ST. LOUIS AND NEW ORLEANS RAILROAD COMPANY v. PULLMAN SOUTHERN CAR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 118. Argued December 16, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. The Pullma
Logan County National Bank v. Townsend
LOGAN COUNTY NATIONAL BANK v. TOWNSEND. EEEOE TO THE COUET OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 170. Submitted January 22, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. T. sold to a national bank, for sixty-eight cents on the dollar, $12,800.of the bond
Pullman's Palace Car Co. v. Central Transportation Co.
PULLMAN’S PALACE CAR COMPANY v. CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. Error to the circuit court of the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 20. Argued January 28, 29, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. Under an indenture in the
Central Transportation Co. v. Pullman's Palace Car Co.
CENTRAL TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. PULLMAN’S PALACE CAR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 379. Argued January 28, 29, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. A statute of a state, whi
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Greenalgh
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS AND MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. GREENALGH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 24. Argued and submitted November 6, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. When a statute extends
St. Paul & Pacific Railroad v. Northern Pacific Railroad
ST. PAUL AND PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. .APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 54. Argued November 5, 6, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. The grant of public la
Anderson v. Watt
ANDERSON v. WATT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT . OF FLORIDA. No. 138. Argued January 8, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. Since the passage of tbe act of March 3, 1875, 18 Stat. 470, if it appear f
Merrill v. Monticello
MERRILL v. MONTICELLO. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE ' DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 125. Argued December 19, 22, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. The implied power of a municipal corporation to borrow money to enable it to
San Francisco City & County v. Le Roy
SAN FRANCISCO CITY AND COUNTY v. LE ROY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 878. Submitted January 19, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The attorney of the city and county of San Fran
Cook County v. Calumet & Chicago Canal & Dock Co.
COOK COUNTY v. CALUMET & CHICAGO CANAL & DOCK COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUFREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 1406. Submitted January 9, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. To give this court jurisdiction of a writ of error to a state court it m
Gormley v. Bunyan
GORMLEY v. BUNYAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 574. Submitted January 9, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The granting or refusal of leave to file an additional plea, or to amend on
Troy Laundry Machinery Co. v. Dolph
TROY LAUNDRY MACHINERY COMPANY v. DOLPH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 149. Argued January 13, 14, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. Dolph contracted to sell to the plaintiff in error
New Orleans v. Gaines's Administrator
NEW ORLEANS v. GAINES’S ADMINISTRATOR. GAINES’S ADMINISTRATOR v. NEW ORLEANS. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 1293, 1320. Argued January 15, 16, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. Th
Ducie v. Ford
DUCIE v. FORD. APPEAL EROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE MONTANA. No. 777. Submitted January 8, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. A trust may result to him who pays the consideration for real estate where the title is taken out in the na
Heath v. Wallace
HEATH v. WALLACE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. No. 528. Submitted January 9, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The question whether or not lands returned as “ subject to periodical overflow ” are “ swamp and overflowed
Schell's v. Fauché
SCHELL’S EXECUTORS v. FAUCHÉ. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 690. Argued January 28, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. It appearing that at the date of the transactions in controversy,
Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Janesville Cotton Mills
LAWRENCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. JANESVILLE COTTON MILLS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 102. Argued December 2, 3, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. When a party returns to a court
Lawrence Manufacturing Co. v. Tennessee Manufacturing Co.
LAWRENCE MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. TENNESSEE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 101. Argued December 3, 1890. Decided March 2, 1891. An exclusive right to the u
Barney v. Oelrichs
BARNEY v. OELRICHS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OE NEW YORK. No. 177. Argued January 30, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The residence out of the State of New York which operated to suspend the run
Cressey v. Meyer
CRESSEY v. MEYER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 145. Argued January 12, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The right of a sovereign to enforce all obligations clue to it, without reg
Williams v. United States
WILLIAMS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP NEVADA. No. 157. Argued January 21, 22, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. If, through inadvertence and mistake, a wrong description is placed in a
Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.
KNEELAND v. AMERICAN LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY. KNEELAND v. BALLOU. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE INDIANA. Nos. 1539, 1540. Argued January 29, 30, 1891. Decided March 2, 1891. The decree in this case in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.