Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1893 Cases
272 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Saltonstall v. Birtwell
SALTONSTALL v. BIRTWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 116. Argued November 24, 1893. Decided December 4, 1893. Hndings of fact in an action brought to recover duties on importations
Hicks v. United States
HICKS v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT CQURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 971. Submitted. November 16, 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. H. .was indicted jointly with. R. for the murder of C. Before th
Jacobs v. George
JACOBS v. GEORGE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 87. Submitted November 20, 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. When an appeal is allowed in open court, and perfected during the term at which the decree or judgm
Root v. Woolworth
ROOT v. WOOLWORTH. APPEAL FROM THE 'CIRCUIT COURT -OE THE HOTTED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 77. Argued and submitted November 10 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. In 1870, M., a citizen of Indiana, filed a bill in equity in' th
In re Lennon
In re LENNON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 925. Argued November 17, 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. The Toledo and Ann Arbor Railway Company, which connected with the Michigan So
Magin v. Karle
MAGIN v. KARLE. MAGIN v. LEHMAN. APPEALS FBOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nob. 84, 85. Argued November 15, 16, 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. Letters patent 248,646, granted to Charles Gor
Gardner v. Michigan Central Railroad
GARDNER v. MICHIGAN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 72. Argued November 7, 1893. Decided November 27, 1893. Plaintiff sued defendant in a Circuit Court of
Hollins v. Brierfield Coal & Iron Co.
HOLLINS v. BRIERFIELD COAL AND IRON COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 29. Argued October 27, 30, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. The trustee.of a mortgage upon the real esta
Eustis v. Bolles
EUSTIS v. BOLLES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 74. Argued November 9, 10, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. The decision by tlie Supremo Judicial Court of Massachusetts that a creditor of an i
Sturm v. Boker
STURM v. BOKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THiS UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 14. Argued October 13, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. In 1867 B. and S. entered into a contract which was evidenced by the following writ
Seney v. Wabash Western Railway Co.
SENEY v. WABASH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE MISSOURI. No. 26. Argued October 23, 24, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. This case is not distinguishable in principle
United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.
UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. WABASH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY. WABASH WESTERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF TIIE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. Nos. 51, 57. Argued Oct
United States v. Rodgers
UNITED STATES v. RODGERS. CERTIFICATE OF DIVISION IN OPINION FROM THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 30. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. The term “high seas,” as used in the provision in Rev. St’at., § 5346, that “ e
Elliott v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
ELLIOTT v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. No. 71. Argued November 6, 7, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. Though questions of negligence and contributory negligence are
Thompson v. Sioux Falls National Bank
THOMPSON v. SIOUX FALLS NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME'COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF DAKOTA. No. 53. Argued October 24, 25, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. In an action at law against a bank to recover on a cheque drawn and issued by its
Knapp v. Morss
KNAPP v. MORSS. UFFORD v. MORSS. APPEAL EROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. Nos. 55, 310. Argued October 26, 1893
McDaid v. Oklahoma Territory ex rel. Smith
McDAID v. OKLAHOMA TERRITORY, ex rel. SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY . OP OKLAHOMA. No. 785. Submitted October 20, 1893. Decided November 20, 1893. .Under the authority conferred upon the Secretary of the Treasury by the
Gibson v. Peters
GIBSON v. PETERS. ERROR • TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE- THE UNITED STATES EOR THE ■ EASTERN DISTRICT OE VIRGINIA. No. 61. Argued November 2, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. The receiver of a national bank is an officer and agent of the United S
Mississippi Mills v. Cohn
MISSISSIPPI MILLS v. COHN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TIIE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 27. Argued October 20, 23, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. The jurisdiction of Federal courts, sitting as courts of e
Lane & Bodley Co. v. Locke
LANE & BODLEY COMPANY v. LOCKE. APPEAL FROM 1'IIE CIRCUIT COURT QF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE 'SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 52. Argued October 25, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. In 1871 L. & B., being partners, commenced tlie manufacture
Hedges v. Dixon County
HEDGES v. DIXON COUNTY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 62. Submitted November 2, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. Holders bf municipal bonds, issued by a county in excess of its authorit
Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.
CAREY v. HOUSTON AND TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL. FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OI THE UNITED STATES FOR" THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 912. Submitted October 23, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. Oral argument is not allowed on moti
Howard v. Detroit Stove Works
HOWARD v. DETROIT STOVE WORKS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 64. Argued November 2, 3, 1893. Decided November 13, 1893. The alleged invention patented in letters patent No. 123,
Empire Coal & Transportation Co. v. Empire Coal & Mining Co.
EMPIRE COAL AND TRANSPORTATION COMPANY v. EMPIRE COAL AND MINING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OE TENNESSEE. No. 60. Submitted October 25, 1893. Decided November 6, 1893. A bill in equit
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.