Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1893 Cases
272 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Wood v. Brady
WOOD v. BRADY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME • COURT OE THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. No. 815. Submitted October 10, 1893. Decided October 23, 1893. The construction placed by %state'c6urt upon one statute implies no obliga- ' tion on its part to put the
United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railroad
UNITED STATES v. DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILROAD COMPANY AND OTHERS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 4. Argued October 10, 1893. Decided October 23, 1893. In this case the court follows its r
United States v. Denver & Rio Grande Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. DENVER AND RIO GRANDE RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE COLORADO. No. 3. Argued October 10, 1893, Decided October 23, 1893. After the expiration of the time limited by the
Wells v. Goodnow's Administrator
WELLS v. GOODNOW’S ADMINISTRATOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE IOWA. No. 160. Submitted October 10, 1893. Decided October 16, 1893. This case is dismissed upon the authority of Chapman v. Goodnow's Administrator, 123 U. S. 540
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Goodridge
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. GOODRIDGE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 211. Argued April 14, 17, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. Jit is no proper business of a railway company as common car
Curtner v. United States
CURTNER v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 258. Argued April 24, 25, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. When, In a suit in equity brought by the United States to set as
Carr v. Quigley
CARR v. QUIGLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. Argued April 26, 27, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. Xands within the exterior limits of a Mexican grant, sub judice at the date of the definite location of the Central Pac
Shute v. Keyser
SHUTE v. KEYSER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 1187. Submitted May 1, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. An appeal or writ of error lies to this court from the judgments or decrees of the Supreme Courts of the Terr
Vincent v. California
Vincent v. California. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of California. No. 1316. Submitted May 1, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893.-
McNulty v. California
McNULTY v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1253. Submitted May 1, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. "The decision of the Supreme Court of, California that McNulty should be punished under the law as it exist
McComb v. Frink
McCOMB v. FRINK. FRINK v. McCOMB. -APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE. Nos. 215, 216. Argued April 25, 26, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. -M. subscribed to the capital stock of a company about to b
Hartranft v. Meyer
HARTRANFT v. MEYER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 860. Argued April 11, 12, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. Piece goods, commercially known and designated as “chinas” and “ mar- .
Walker v. Seeberger
WALKER v. SEEBERGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 151. Argued April 11, 12, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. Trimmings of various styles and materials, some composed entirely of silk,
Cadwalader v. Wanamaker
CADWALADER v. WANAMAKER. BRROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 31. Argued April 11, 12, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. Imported articles, commercially known as ribbons, composed wholly or
Pickett v. Foster
PICKETT v. FOSTER APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED- STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 175. Argued and submitted March 24, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. The Supreme Court of Louisiana having decided that under the po
Porter v. Sabin
PORTER v. SABIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 221. Argued April 19, 20, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. After a state court has appointed a receiver of all the property of a corporation,
St. Louis v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
ST. LOUIS v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. PETITION FOR A REHEARING OF A CASE DECIDED MARCH 6, 1893, AND REPORTED 148 U. S. 92. No. 94. Submitted April 27, 1893. Decided May 15, 1893. The city of St. Louis is authorized by the Constituti
Byers v. McAuley
BYERS v. McAULEY. McAULEY v. McAULEY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. Nos. 124, 130. Argued and submitted February 2, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. It is a rule of general applicat
Evans v. Stettnisch
EVANS v. STETTNISCH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 279. Submitted April 27, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. An affidavit made by one of plaintiff’s attorneys, he havinfe been represented in th
Hill v. United States
HILL v. UNITED STATES. Error to the circuit court of the united states for the DISTRICT OF MARYLAND. No. 108. Argued and submitted January 6, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. A claim by a person asserting title in land under tide water, for dama
Hollender v. Magone
HOLLENDER v. MAGONE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITE]? STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 172. Argued April 10, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. The word “liquors” is frequently, if not generally, used to define spirits or
Loeber v. Schroeder
LOEBER v. SCHROEDER. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND. No. 1280. Submitted May 1, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. A writ, of error will not lie to review an order of the highest court of a. State overruling a motion to qua
Sheffield Furnace Co. v. Witherow
SHEFFIELD FURNACE COMPANY v. WITHEROW. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 190. Argued April 28, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. A demurrer lacking the affidavit of defendant'and certific
Coats v. Merrick Thread Co.
COATS v. MERRICK THREAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 261. Argued April 27, 28, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Irrespective of any question of tracle-marks, rival manufac
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.