Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1893 Cases
272 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pam-To-Pee v. United States
PHINEAS PAM-TO-PEE v. UNITED STATES. POTTAWATOMIE INDIANS OF MICHIGAN AND INDIANA v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE- COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 1125, 1133. Argued January 9, 10, 1893. Decided April 17, 1893. The decision of the Court of Claims
Bushnell v. Crooke Mining & Smelting Co.
BUSHNELL v. CROOKE MINING & SMELTING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE COLORADO. No. 195, Argued and submitted April 4, 5, 1893. Decided April 17, 1893. A federal question, suggested for the first time in a petition for a
Smith v. Whitman Saddle Co.
SMITH v. WHITMAN SADDLE COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP CONNECTICUT. No. 188. Argued and submitted March 28, 1893. Decided April 17, 1893. Where a new and original shape or configuration of an
Mexia v. Oliver
MEXIA v. OLIVER ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 182. Submitted March 28, 1893. Decided April 17, 1893. In Texas, a married woman, who owns land in her own right, cannot convey it by he
Martin v. Snyder
MARTIN v. SNYDER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF' THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 131. Argued and submitted March 9, 10, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. A defendant residing -within a State in which an action is
Giozza v. Tiernan
GIOZZA v. TIERNAN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES EOR 'THE EASTERN DISTRICT OP TEXAS. No. 185. Submitted March 28, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. The provisions in the legislation of the State of Texas, respecting the tax
United States v. Isaacs
UNITED STATES v. ISAACS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. FOR THE EASTERN .DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 391. Argued March 15, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. Cigarette paper, matte of a qiiality, and cut into a size, fit for wra
Humphreys v. Perry
HUMPHREYS v. PERRY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR • THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 167. Argued and submitted March 23, 24, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. A travelling salesman for a jewelry firm bought a pass
Casement v. Brown
CASEMENT v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 173. Submitted March 24, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. A contractor agreed with a railroad company to construct piers for a bridge ove
Swan Land & Cattle Co. v. Frank
SWAN LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY v. FRANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 150. Argued March 21, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. A party having a claim for unliquidated damages against
Atchison Board of Education v. De Kay
ATCHISON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. DE KAY. EEROS TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 176. Argued and submitted March 24, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. The bonds issued by the city of Atchison, Kansas, Janua
Lonergan v. Buford
LONERGAN v. BUFORD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF UTAH. No. 203. Submitted March 30, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. A' contract being entered into for tbe sale of extensive ranch privileges and of all the cattle on the ranch
German Bank v. United States
GERMAN BANK OF MEMPHIS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 693. Submitted March 30, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. The United States cannot be held' liable in the Court of Claims for the amount of registered bonds which th
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT .COURT OP fHE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP COLORADO. No. 149. Argued March 20, 21, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. The right conferred by'the acfof July 1,' 1862, 12
Krementz v. S. Cottle Co.
KREMENTZ v. THE S. COTTLE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT "COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR' THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. • No. 161. Argued and submitted March 23, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. Letters patent No. 298,303, issued May 6,
Grant v. Walter
GRANT v. WALTER. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 187. Argued March 28, 1893. Decided April 10, 1893. Letters patent, No. 267,192,'issued November 7, 1882, to James M. Grant for “
Lascelles v. Georgia
LASCELLES v. GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 1262. Decided April 3, 1893. A fugitive from justice who has been surrendered by one State of the Union to another State, upon requisition charging him with the c
Chicot County v. Sherwood
CHICOT COUNTY v. SHERWOOD. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES EOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OE ARKANSAS. No. 170. Submitted March 24, 1893. Decided April 3, 1893. An action will lie in a Circuit Court of the United States in the Sta
Virginia v. Tennessee
VIRGINIA v. TENNESSEE. ORIGINAL. , No. 3. Original. Argued March 8, 9, 1893. Decided April 3, 1893. The boundary line between the States of Virginia and Tennessee, which was ascertained and adjusted by commissioners appointed by and on beha
Bender v. Pennsylvania Co.
BENDER v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY. ERROR TO THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 193. Submitted March 29, 1893. Decided April 3, 1893. An order overruling a motion to remand a case to a State Court is
Smith v. Townsend
SMITH v. TOWNSEND. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME C.OURT OF THE TERRITORY OF OKLAHOMA. ■ No. 1173. Submitted March 6, 1893. Decided April 3, 1893. An employé of the Atchison, Topeka and Santa 3Té Railroad, residing within the Territory of Oklahoma
National Hat Pouncing Machine Co. v. Hedden
NATIONAL HAT POUNCING MACHINE COMPANY v. HEDDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 138. Argued March 13, 14, 1893. Decided April 3. 1893. The fifth claim in letters patent No. 220,889, is
United States v. Old Settlers
UNITED STATES v. OLD SETTLERS. OLD SETTLERS v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 1031, 1032. Argued December 13, 14, 1892. Decided April 3, 1893. Finding of facts by the Court of Claims, in a suit which Congress has auth
Manhattan Co. v. Blake
MANHATTAN COMPANY v. BLAKE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 163. Submitted March 23, 1893. Decided April 3, 1893. Under § 110 of the act of June 30, 1864, c. 173, 13 Stat. 27-7, aft
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.