Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1893 Cases
272 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Brigham v. Coffin
BRIGHAM v. COFFIN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 251. Argued and submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Letters patent No. 283,057; issued August 14,- 1883, to Frank E. Al
Ide v. Ball Engine Co.
IDE v. BALL ENGINE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 227. Argued April 21, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Letters patent No. 301,720, issued July 8, 1884, to Albert L. Ide fo
Bibb v. Allen
BIBB v. ALLEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 269. Argued April 28, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Motions to suppress depositions for irregularities should be made before the case is ca
Cates v. Allen
CATES v. ALLEN. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 153. Argued March 22, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. A contract creditor who has not reduced his claim to judgment has no standin
Metropolitan Bank v. St. Louis Dispatch Co.
METROPOLITAN BANK v. ST. LOUIS DISPATCH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR. THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 224. Argued April 20, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Courts of equity in cases of concurrent jurisdi
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Nelson
Minneapolis and St. Louis Railway Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Nelson. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Minnesota. No. 241. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893.
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Emmons
MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. EMMONS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 240. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Tlie 'statutes of the State of Minnesota, requiring railway companies to fen
Hobbie v. Jennison
HOBBIE v. JENNISON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 270. Submitted April 27, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. An assignee for Michigan, of a patent for an improvement in pipes, made, sold
Cadwalader v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.
CADWALADER v. JESSUP AND MOORE PAPER COMPANY. error to the circuit court of the united states for the EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 276. Submitted April 27, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Old india-rubber shoes, invoiced as “rubber scr
Hedden v. Richard
HEDDEN v. RICHARD. error to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 208. Submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. The language of commerce, when used in laws imposing duties on importa^ tions
Wade v. Chicago, Springfield & St. Louis Railroad
WADE v. CHICAGO, SPRINGFIELD AND ST. LOUIS RAILROAD COMPANY. AMERICAN LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY v. WADE. APPEALS-PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POB THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT .OP ILLINOIS. Nos. 247, 248. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decid
Dalzell v. Dueber Watch Case Manufacturing Co.
DALZELL v. DUEBER WATCH CASE MANUFACTURING COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 213, 214. Argued April 18, 19, 1893, Decided May 10, 1893. An oral agreement fo
California v. San Pablo & Tulare Railroad
CALIFORNIA v. SAN PABLO AND TULARE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 257. Argued April 24, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. If, pending a writ of error to reverse a jud
Nix v. Hedden
NIX v. HEDDEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 137. Submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. The court takes judicial notice of the ordinary meaning of all words in our tongu
Moses v. Lawrence County Bank
MOSES v. LAWRENCE COUNTY BANK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT,OF ALABAMA. No. 166. Submitted March 23, 1893. Decided May 10, 1893. Under a statute of frauds which requires the consideration of a prom
United States v. Dumas
United States v. Dumas. No. 231. Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Louisiana. Submitted April 20, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893.
United States v. Dumas
UNITED STATES v. DUMAS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 230. Submitted April 20, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. An order of the Postmaster General, made in the exercise of the discretio
United States v. Mock
UNITED STATES v. MOCK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 233. Submitted April 21, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. When the defendant in an action of trespass- brought by the United State
Richmond & Danville Railroad v. Elliott
RICHMOND AND DANVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. ELLIOTT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 199. Argued April 5, 6, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. On the trial of an action by a coupler and switc
Interstate Commerce Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad
INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FÉ RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 1275. Submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. No appeal
Nash v. Harshman
NASH v. HARSHMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 957. Submitted April 17, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. This case is dismissed upon the authority of Hohorst v. Hamburg-American Packet
United States v. Jones
UNITED STATES v. JONES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 262. Submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. A bill of exceptions signed after the final adjournment of the court for
Abadie v. United States
ABADIE v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 260. Submitted April 24, 1893. Decided May 1, 1893. On the authority of Cameron v. United States, 146 U. S. 533, this c
Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McKeen
CINCINNATI, HAMILTON AND DAYTON RAILROAD COMPANY v. McKEEN. CERTIFICATE FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 1024. Submitted December 12, 1892. Decided May 1, 1893. This case coming on to be heard bef
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.