Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carr v. Fife
CARR v. FIFE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 215. Submitted January 30, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. It is too late to urge in this court stipulations between parties not brought to th
Lindsay v. First National Bank
LINDSAY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF SHREVEPORT. APPEAL FROM AND ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT- COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. ' No. 132. Argued and submitted December 19, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. A national bank
St. Louis, Cape Girardeau & Fort Smith Railway Co. v. Missouri ex rel. Merriam
ST. LOUIS, CAPE GIRARDEAU AND FORT SMITH RAILWAY COMPANY v. MISSOURI ex rel. MERRIAM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 751. Submitted January 14, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. The granting by the Supreme Court of a St
Bell Silver & Copper Mining Co. v. First National Bank
BELL SILVER AND COPPER MINING COMPANY v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF BUTTE. error to and appeal from the supreme court of the territory OF MONTANA. . No. 154. Argued January 16, 17, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. Aproyision, in a deed of real esta
Bannon v. United States
BANNON AND MULKEY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 807. Argued January 23, 1895. Decided March. 4, 1895. A conspiracy to commit an offence against the United States is not a
Coffin v. United States
COFFIN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STAGES FOR THE DISTRICT OF. INDIANA. No. 741. Argued December 6, 7, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. The offence of aiding or abetting an officer of a national bank iri committi
Batchelor v. United States
BATCHELOR v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 775. Argued January 23, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. The offence of wilfully misapplying by the president of the funds of a nationa
Cunningham v. Macon & Brunswick Railroad
CUNNINGHAM v. MACON & BRUNSWICK RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA. No. 91. Argued November 22, 23, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. In 1866 tlie legislature of Georgia enac
Mather v. Rillston
MATHER v. RILLSTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 139. Argued January 22, 23, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. Occupations which cannot "be conducted without necessary danger to life,
Hays v. Steiger
HAYS v. STEIGER. ERROR to THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 67. Submitted November 9, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. The grant of the Agua Caliente to Lazaro Pina by Governor Alvarado in 1840 was a valid grant, and embraced th
Illinois Central Railroad v. Brown
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE' CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 632. Submitted February 4, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. McLish v. Roff, 141 U. S. 661, and Chicago, St.
Winter v. Montgomery
WINTER v. MONTGOMERY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA. No. 533. Submitted February 4, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, affirmed and followed. Motion to dismiss, coupled with which was a motion
Waldron v. Waldron
WALDRON v. WALDRON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 97. Submitted December 4, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. A bill of exceptions may bé signed after the expiration of the term at whi
United States ex rel. Siegel v. Thoman
UNITED STATES ex rel. SIEGEL v. THOMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 125. Submitted December 18, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. The provision in act No. 30 of the Louisiana Statute
Maricopa & Phœnix Railroad v. Arizona Territory
MARICOPA AND PHŒNIX RAILROAD COMPANY v. ARIZONA TERRITORY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 195. Submitted January 28, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. When Congress grants to a railway company organized under the
Palmer v. Corning
PALMER v. CORNING. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POE THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK No. 137. Argued January 8, 9, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. The improvement in sewer gratings patented to Henry W. Clapp by letters p
Connell v. Smiley
CONNELL v. SMILEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 14. Submitted January 22, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. A party in a cause pending in a state court who petitions for its removal to a Fe
Bank of Rondout v. Smith
BANK OF RONDOUT v. SMITH. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 113. Argued December 13, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. A decree by a Circuit Court dismissing a bill in equity as to one def
Brown v. Webster
BROWN v. WEBSTER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 160. Submitted January 16, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. The measure of damages for the purpose of jurisdiction, in an action against the gra
In re Lehigh Mining & Manufacturing Co.
In re LEHIGH MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No number. Submitted January 28, 1895. Decided March 4, 1895. A corporation organized under the laws of Pennsylvania brought an action in ejectment in the Circuit Court of
Emert v. Missouri
EMERT v. MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 120. Argued and submitted December 14, 1894. Decided March 4, 1895. A statute of a State, by which peddlers' of goods, going from place to place within the State to
Hudson v. Parker
HUDSON v. PARKER. ORIGINAL. No. 9. Original. Submitted January 7, 1895. Decided February 4, 1895. A writ of error, under the act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, § 5, from this court to a Circuit or District Court of the United States, in a case o
Andrews v. Swartz
ANDREWS v. SWARTZ. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 710. Submitted January 21, 1895. Decided February 4, 1895. A review by the appellate court of a State of a final judgment in a crimina
Roller Mill Patent
THE ROLLER MILL PATENT. APPEAL EEOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 70. Argued November 12, 1894. Decided February 4, 1895. The invention protected by. letters patent No. 222,895, issued Dec
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.