Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Mattox v. United States
MATTOX v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 667. Submitted December 10, 1895. Decided February 4, 1895. Caha v. United States, 152 U. S. 211, followed in holding that the homicid
McGahan v. Bank of Rondout
McGAHAN v. BANK OF RONDOUT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 104. Argued December 12, 1894. Decided February 4, 1895. In a suit of equity to enforce tbe rights of a mortgagee in mort
In re Chapman
In re CHAPMAN, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No number. Submitted January 22, 1895. Decided February 4, 1895. C., being summoned before a committee of the Senate of the United States and questioned there as to certain transactions, declined to answ
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Baltimore
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE COMPANY v. BALTIMORE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE-OF MARYLAND. No. 828. Submitted January 21, 1895. Decided January 28, 1895. St. Louis v. Western Union Tel. Co., 148 U. S. 92, affirmed and applied to t
Lindsay v. Burgess
LINDSAY v. BURGESS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT O.F TENNESSEE. No. 191. Submitted January 25, 1895. Decided January 28, 1895. The assignment in this court of errors to portions of the charge in a
In re Streep
In re STREEP, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No number. Submitted January 21, 1895. Decided January 28, 1895. The judge in a Circuit Court having settled and signed a bill of exceptions, this court will not, on an application, supported'by affidavit
Lazarus v. Phelps
LAZARUS v. PHELPS. ERROR 'TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 105. Argued December 12, 1894. Decided January 28, 1895. In an action to recover the rental value of plaintiff’s land alleged to hav
Dunbar v. United States
DUNBAR v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. No. 693. Argued December 5, 6, 1894. Decided January 28, 1895. In an indictment for smuggling opium a description of the property smuggled
In re Robertson
In re ROBERTSON, Petitioner. original. No number. Submitted January 21, 1895. Decided January 22, 1895. Applications to this court for a writ of error to a state court are not entertained unless at the request of .a member of the court, con
Sparf v. United States
SPARF AND HANSEN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 613. Submitted March 5, 1894. Decided January 21, 1895. If one of two persons accused of having together committ
Rouse v. Letcher
ROUSE v. LETCHER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 582. Submitted December 17, 1894. Decided January 21, 1895. A judgment in a Circuit Court of Appeals upon the claim of an intervenor," set up in a Circui
Stuart v. Easton
STUART v. EASTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 151. Argued January 15, 1895. Decided January 21, 1895. An averment that the plaintiff is “ á citizen of London, England,” is no
United States v. E. C. Knight Co.
UNITED STATES v. E. C. KNIGHT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 675. Argued October 24, 1894. Decided January 21, 1895. The monopoly and restraint denounced by the act of July 2, 1890, c. 647, 26 S
Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. Adams
POSTAL TELEGRAPH CABLE COMPANY v. ADAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MISSISSIPPI. No. 649. Submitted December 3, 1894. Decided January 21, 1895. While a State cannot exclude from its limits a corporation engaged in- interstat
Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. Pennsylvania
DELAWARE AND HUDSON CANAL COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 452. Submitted January 7, 1895. Decided January 14, 1895. Reversed upon the authority of New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad
McKnight v. James
McKNIGHT v. JAMES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO FOR THE SECOND JUDICIAL CIRCUIT. No. 841. Argued and submitted December 19, 1894. Decided January 14, 1895. A writ of error will not go from this court to an order of a judg
Sherman v. United States
SHERMAN v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL EEOM THE COURT OE CLAIMS. No. 664. Submitted December 13, 1894. Decided January 14, 1895. A chief supervisor of elections, appointed under the provision of Rev. Stat. § 2025, is not required by law to make c
Brown v. Spilman
BROWN v. SPILMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 92. Submitted November 23, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. A grant in a lease of forty acres of land, described by metes and bounds,
Hooper v. California
HOOPER v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 7. Argued October 10, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. Section 439 of the Penal Code of California, making it a misdemeanor fo
Davis v. Schwartz
DAVIS v. SCHWARTZ. APPEAL FROM THE .CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA, EASTERN DIVISION. No. 75. Argued November 12, 13, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. In a case referred to a master to report the evidence
Market Street Cable Railway Co. v. Rowley
MARKET STREET CABLE RAILWAY COMPANY v. ROWLEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 161. Submitted December 13, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. If, upon the state of the ai't as shown t
Campbell v. Haverhill
CAMPBELL v. HAVERHILL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 87. Argued November 21, 22, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. ■ Where a party excepts to a ruling of the court, but, not standing upo
Potts v. Creager
POTTS v. CREAGER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 94 Argued November 23, 1894 Decided January 7, 1895. The machine patented to Clayton Potts and Albert Potts by letters .patent No. 3
United States v. Allred
UNITED STATES v. ALLRED. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 552. Submitted December 3, 1894. Decided January 7, 1895. A commissioner of a Circuit Court is an officer of the court, authorized by law, and is entitled to his fees in the foll
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.