Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Washington & Idaho Railroad v. Cœur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.
WASHINGTON AND IDAHO RAILROAD COMPANY v. CŒUR D’ALENE RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP IDAHO. No. 4. Argued November 13, 14, 1895. Decided December 2, 1895. Affirmed upon the authority of Was
Washington & Idaho Railroad v. Cœur D'Alene Railway & Navigation Co.
WASHINGTON & IDAHO RAILROAD COMPANY v. CŒUR D’ALENE RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY. ERROR TO THE OIROUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 585. Argued November 13, 14, 1895. Decided December 2, 1895. An action commenced May 27, 18
Goldsby v. United States
GOLDSBY, alias Cherokee Bill, v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 620. Submitted October 21, 1895. Decided December 2, 1895. There is nothing in this case to take it ou
Little Rock & Memphis Railroad v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad
LITTLE ROCK AND MEMPHIS RAILROAD COMPANY v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. Argued and submitted November 14, 1895. Decided Dec
Ansbro v. United States
ANSBRO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR to the circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 588. Argued November 19, 1895. Decided December 2, 1895. An assignment of errors cannot be availed of to import questions in
The Bayonne
THE BAYONNE. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 215. Submitted November 18, 1895. Decided December 2, 1895. The District Court of tne United States for the Southern District of New
Moore v. Missouri
MOORE v. MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 493. Argued and submitted October 30, 1895. Decided November 25, 1895. The provision in § 3959 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri that prisoners convicted two or m
Goode v. United States
GOODE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 616. Argued November 1, 1895. Decided November 25, 1895. When a verdict is general upon all the counts in an indictment, suffici
Gillis v. Stinchfield
GILLIS v. STINCHFIELD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 661. Submitted November 11,1895. Decided November 25, 1895. The decision by the highest court of a State that the grantor of a portion of the ground of .a min
Mills v. Green
MILLS v. GREEN APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 782. Submitted October 28, 1895. Decided November 25, 1895. When, pending an appeal from the judgment of a lower court, and without any fault of the defenda
Rutland Railroad v. Central Vermont Railroad
RUTLAND RAILROAD COMPANY v. CENTRAL VERMONT RAILROAD COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. ERROR TO THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF FRANKLIN COUNTY IN' THE STATE OF VERMONT. Nos. 51, 472. Argued April 19, 22, 1895. Decided November 19, 1895. When the highest cou
United States v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
UNITED STATES v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY AND UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE OIEOUIT OOUET OF THE UNITED STATES FOE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 19. Argued December 18, 1894. Decided November 18, 1895. Although
United States v. Union Pacific Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY AND WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 334. Argued October 18, 19, 1894. Decided November 18, 1895. The objects which Congress
Bucklin v. United States
BUCKLIN v. UNITED STATES (No. 2). error to the. district court of the united states foe the DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 572. Submitted October 21, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. The consolidation of several indictments against different perso
Bucklin v. United States
BUCKLIN v. UNITED STATES (No. 1). APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 246. Submitted October 21, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. The final judgmént of a court of the United States in a case o
Lambert v. Barrett
LAMBERT v. BARRETT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 771. Submitted November 11, 1895. — Decided November 18, 1895. The several questions raised by the counsel for the petitioner are mat
Stewart v. McHarry
STEWART v. McHARRY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 366. Submitted October 22, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. In March, 1876, S. went into actual possession and occupation of a t'ract-of public land in Californi
Folsom v. Ninety Six
FOLSOM v. NINETY SIX. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS' FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 354. Submitted December 3, 1894. Decided November 18, 1895. When a township has been created by law as a territorial division of a State, with
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Griffith
BALTIMORE & OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. GRIFFITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 53. Argued October 18, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. When the judgment actually rendered in the court b
McDowell v. United States
McDOWELL v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 552. Submitted October 15, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. There being a vacancy in the office of District Judge for the District .of Sout
Clune v. United States
CLUNE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED . STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 517. Argued October 30, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. It is doubtful whether the record and bill of exceptions presen
Hilton's Administrator v. Jones
HILTON’S ADMINISTRATOR v. JONES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA. No. 1. Submitted October 28, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. L. filed his petition in a State court of Nebraska,- setting for
Cowley v. Northern Pacific Railroad
COWLEY v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No. 67. Argued and submitted October 22, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. In a proceeding — commenced in a court
Dejonge v. Magone
DEJONGE v. MAGONE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED áTATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 56. Argued November 1, 1895. Decided November 18, 1895. Papers, coated, colored and embossed to imitate leather, and papers coated
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.