Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Gilfillan v. McKee
GILFILLAN v. McKEE. McPHERSON, EXECUTOR, v. McKEE. APPEALS FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 26, 46. Argued March 14, 15, 1895. Decided October 21, 1895. When a decree in chancery awards to a party in the suit a porti
Richmond Nervine Co. v. Richmond
RICHMOND NERVINE COMPANY v. RICHMOND. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 59. Argued April 30, May 1, 1895. Decided October 21, 1895. The fact that a trade-mart bears the name and po
Simmons v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.
SIMMONS v. BURLINGTON, CEDAR RAPIDS AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. BURLINGTON, CEDAR RAPIDS AND NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SIMMONS. Nos. 11 and 12. Argued November 1, 1894. Decided October 21, 1895. When a junior mortgagee is a party defend
Indiana v. Kentucky
INDIANA v. KENTUCKY. ORIGINAL. No. 2. Original. Submitted October 15, 1895. Decided October 21, 1895. The court appoints commissioners to run the disputed boundary line in accordance with its decision, announced May 19, 1890, 136 U. S. 479.
United States v. Fitch
United States v. Fitch. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York. No. 828. Submitted with No. 422. Mr. Solicitor Generad- for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Benjamin F. Dos Passos and Mr. Edgar J. Levey for defendant in error.
Oregon Short Line & Utah Northern Railway Co. v. Mullan
Oregon Short Line and Utah Northern Railway Company v. Mullan. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Oregon. No. 148. Argued with No. 147. Mr. John M. Thurston for plaintiff in error. Mr. John F. Dillon was on his brief. Mr. Alfred S.
Richards v. Chase Elevator Co.
RICHARDS v. CHASE ELEVATOR COMPANY. PETITION EOK A REHEARING. No. 319 of October term, 1894. Received June 3, 1895 Denied November 11, 1895. The court, on application to file a petition for rehearing, adheres to Its opinion, reported in 158
Ritchie v. McMullen
RITCHIE v. McMULLEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 15. Argued November 10, 14, 1898. Decided June 3, 1895. In an action upon a foreign judgment, an answer admitting that “ certain att
Hilton v. Guyot
HILTON v. GUYOT. HILTON v. GUYOT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES' FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. Nos. 130, 34. Argued April 1
Central Land Co. v. Laidley
CENTRAL LAND COMPANY v. LAIDLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 239. Argued March 29, April 1, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. This court has no jurisdiction of a writ of error to a state court, on the
Brown v. United States
BROWN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 863. Submitted March 5, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. An instruction on the trial of a person indicted for murder, whereby the v
In re Belt
In re BELT, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No number. Submitted April 29, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. The Supreme Court of the District of Columbia had jurisdiction and authority to determine the validity of the act of July 23, 1892, c. 236, which a
Grand Rapids & Indiana Railroad v. Butler
GRAND RAPIDS AND INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY v. BUTLER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 198. Argued and submitted January 29, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. The decision by a state court that- the pleadings were sufficien
United States v. Burr
UNITED STATES v. BURR. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIJRCUIT. No. 1021. Submitted May 20, 1895. Decided. June 3, 1895. G,oods arriving at the port of New York August 7,' 1894, entered at the cus- ■ tom house
Gray v. Connecticut
GRAY v. CONNECTICUT. ERROR TO THE ' SUPREME COURT. OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. i No. 258. Submitted April 4, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. A license to pursue any business or occupation, from the governing authority of any municipa
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Smith
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. ' - Argued and submitted December 19, 1894. Decided June 3, 1895. When the .receipt giVen by a local land off
Spencer v. McDougal
SPENCER v. McDOUGAL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 245. Argued April 3, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. By the order of the Commissioner of the General Land Office of June 12, 1856, t
Wisconsin Central Railroad v. Forsythe
WISCONSIN CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. FORSYTHE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERS! DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 238. Argued March 28, 29, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. The land in controversy in this case is withi
Horne v. Smith
HORNE v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 341. Submitted May 2, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. In this case the United States Surveyors obviously surveyed the plaintiff’s lot only
White v. Ewing
WHITE v. EWING. certificate from the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 913. Submitted May 20, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. A Circuit Court of the United States has “ jurisdiction, in a general creditor’s suit properly pendi
Townsend v. St. Louis & Sandoval Coal & Mining Co.
TOWNSEND v. ST. LOUIS AND SANDOVAL COAL AND MINING COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 308. Argued April 25, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. The issues in this case were substan
White v. Van Horn
WHITE v. VAN HORN. ERROR. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT CE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS.. No. 261. Submitted April 5, 1895. Decided June 3, 1895. It is competent to explain by proof declarations of a privy in interest, admitt
In re Debs
IN RE DEBS, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 11. Original. Argued March 25, 26, 1895. Decided May 27, 1895. The order of the Circuit Court finding the petitioners guilty of contempt, and sentencing them to imprisonment, was not a final judgment or
Beard v. United States
BABE BEARD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 842. Submitted March 13, 1895. Decided May 27, 1895. A man assailed on his own grounds, without provocation, by a person
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.