Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Koenigsberger v. Richmond Silver Mining Co.
KOENIGSBERGER v. RICHMOND SILVER MINING COMPANY. RICHMOND SILVER MINING COMPANY v. KOENIGSBERGER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. Nos. 260, 220. Argued April 4, 5, 1895. Decided April 22, 18
Newport News & Mississippi Valley Co. v. Pace
NEWPORT NEWS AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY COMPANY v. PACE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 223. Argued January 31, 1895. Decided April 22, 1895. The fact that objections are made tq the a
Roberts v. Northern Pacific Railroad
ROBERTS v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 124. Argued December 17, 18, 1894. Decided April 22, 1895. Where a railroad company, having the powe
In re Buchanan
In re BUCHANAN, Petitioner. ORIGINAL. No. 12. Original. Argued April 16, 1895. Decided April 17, 1895. A question in relation to the physical and .mental condition of a juror and his competency to return a verdict is a question of fact, and
Mattingly v. Northwestern Virginia Railroad
MATTINGLY v. NORTHWESTERN VIRGINIA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 140. Submitted March 14, 1895. Decided April 15, 1895. The petition for removal in this case was
Lambert v. Barrett
LAMBERT v. BARRETT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 928. Submitted March 25,1895. Decided April 15, 1895. The contention that petitioner cannot be made to pay the penalty for the crime
Last Chance Mining Co. v. Tyler Mining Co.
LAST CHANCE MINING COMPANY v. TYLER MINING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 831. Argued March. 6, T, 1895. Decided April 15, 1895. When the course of a mineral vein is across a claim, instead of
Jones v. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad
JONES v. EAST TENNESSEE, VIRGINIA AND GEORGIA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 253. Argued April 4, 1S95. Decided April 8, 1895. The record showed that plaintiff as
Allen v. United States
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 788. Submitted March 4,1S95. Decided April 8, 1895. In a trial for murder by shooting with a pistol it appeared that the accus
Treat Manufacturing Co. v. Standard Steel & Iron Co.
TREAT MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. STANDARD STEEL AND IRON COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 358. Submitted March 25, 1S95. Decided April 8, 1895. Where the trial judge is satisf
Davis & Rankin Building & Manufacturing Co. v. Barber
DAVIS AND RANKIN BUILDING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. BARBER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 818. Submitted March 25,1895. Decided April 8, 1895. On the authority of Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U
Keeler v. Standard Folding Bed Co.
KEELER v. STANDARD FOLDING BED COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 52. Submitted March 20,1894. Decided April 8, 1895. One who buys patented articles of manufacture from one aut
Pollock v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
POLLOCK v. FARMERS’ LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 893. Argued March 7, 8, 11, 12, 13, 1895. Decided April 8, 1895. A court of equity has jurisdiction to
Lutcher v. United States
LUTCHER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE .EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 271. Submitted April 5, 1895. Decided April 8, 1895. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court it is held, (1) that t
Bergemann v. Backer
BERGEMANN v. BACKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY. No. 709. Submitted March 5,1895. Decided April 1, 1895. When a prisoner is indicted in a state court for murder, it is for the courts of
Ralli v. Troop
RALLI v. TROOP. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 46. Submitted April 2Í, 1S9I. Decided April 1, 1895. The scuttling of a ship by the municipal authorities of a port, without the d
Orchard v. Alexander
ORCHARD v. ALEXANDER. PIERCE v. FRACE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OE WASHINGTON. Nos. 192, 193. Argusd and submitted .March. 13,1895. decided April 1, 1895. The Commissioner of the General Land Office may direct the proper loca
Stevens's Administrator v. Nichols
STEVENS’S ADMINISTRATOR v. NICHOLS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 789. Submitted March 13,1895. Decided April 1, 1895. The denial by a state court of an application to amend a petition for the removal of the cause
Colvin v. Jacksonville
COLVIN v. JACKSONVILLE. APPEAL EEOli THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA. No. 874. Submitted March 11,1895. Decided April 1, 1895. Maynard v. Hecht, 151 U. S. 324, affirmed to the point that, “Where a
Barney v. Rickard
BARNEY v. RICKARD. ERROR-TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 218. Argued January 31, 1895 Decided April 1, 1895. Under the act of. February 26, 1845, c. 22, 5 Stat. 727, a protest against the
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Shane
GULF, COLORADO AND SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY v. SHANE. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES COURT EOR THE INDIAN TERRITORY. No. 212. Submitted January 29,1895. Decided April 1, 1895. It being settled that by the joint resolution of March 3, 1891, 26 S
Bardon v. Land & River Improvement Co.
BARDON v. LAND AND RIVER IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 188. Argued January 18,1895. Decided March 28, 1895. Although section 3186 of the Revised Statutes o
Sanford Fork & Tool Co. v. Howe Brown & Co.
SANFORD FORK AND TOOL COMPANY v. HOWE BROWN AND COMPANY, LIMITED. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF INDIANA. No. 190. Argued January 23, 1S95. Decided March 28, 1895. A corporation, acting in good faith
Walton v. Marietta Chair Co.
WALTON v. MARIETTA CHAIR COMPANY. ERROR TO . THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 284. Submitted March 4, 1895. Decided. March 25, 1895. A writ of error, which names, as the plaintiff in error, a cer
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.