Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1895 Cases
275 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Urlin
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. URLIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA. No. 272. Submitted April 5, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. While it cannot be safely said that, in no case can a court of
Virginia v. Tennessee
VIRGINIA v. TENNESSEE. ORIGINAL. No. 3. Original. Submitted May 6, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. This court is without jurisdiction to enter a consent decree at this term in a cause finally determined at October term, 1893, and improperly ret
Boyd v. Janesville Hay Tool Co.
BOYD v. JANESVILLE HAY TOOL COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN. No. 305. Argued April 23, 24, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. Under letters patent No. 300,687, granted June 17,1884,
Russell v. Maxwell Land Grant Co.
RUSSELL v. MAXWELL LAND GRANT COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 321. Submitted April 29, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. A survey made by the proper officers of the United States, and con
Stoneroad v. Stoneroad
STONEROAD v. STONEROAD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 11. Submitted November 9, 1893. Decided May 20, 1895. The act of Congress of June 21, 1860, c. 167, confirming the claim of Preston Beck, Jr., to a grhnt
Wright v. United States
WRIGHT AND WADE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 766. Submitted December 10, 1894. Decided May 20, 1895. On proof of the loss of the. written authority issued by ta mar
Episcopal City Mission v. Brown
EPISCOPAL CITY MISSION v. BROWN. •APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 250. Submitted April 4, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. M., after mortgaging lots in Boston to the Episcopal Mission
De Sollar v. Hanscome
DE SOLLAR v. HANSCOME. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO. No. 303. Argued and submitted April 23, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. It is of'the essence of estoppel by judgment' that it is certain tha
Kennedy v. Magone
KENNEDY v. MAGONE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 232. Submitted March 28, 1895. Decided May 20, 1895. A charge by the collector of customs at New York for storage in the public st
Rich v. Braxton
RICH v. BRAXTON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 17. Argued November 16, 17, 1898. Decided May 6, 1895. C., in his lifetime, was in possession, claiming ownership under divers patent
The Oregon
THE OREGON. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Nos. 270, 273. Argued April 8, 9, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. A steamer steaming in a dark night at the rate of fifteen miles an hour through a narro
Sayward v. Denny
SAYWARD v. DENNY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 951. Submitted April 22, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. When the validity of no treaty or statute of, or authority exercised under, the United States, nor of a statute
Teall v. Schroder
TEALL v. SCHRODER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 272. Argued April 9, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. When' a power of attorney to sell and convey lands of the donor of the power,
Catholic Bishop of Nesqually v. Gibbon
CATHOLIC BISHOP OF NESQUALLY v. GIBBON. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON. No 277. Argued April 9, 10, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. No question as to jurisdiction in this case having been taken
Keyes v. Eureka Consolidated Mining Co.
KEYES v. EUREKA CONSOLIDATED MINING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 228. Argued April 15, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. A person in the employ of a smelting company inven
White v. Joyce
WHITE v. JOYCE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 103. Argued December 4, 5, 1894. Decided May 6, 1895. A bill in equity against the administratrix of a deceased partner in a firm, which was dissolved in the lif
Beardsley v. Arkansas & Louisiana Railway Co.
BEARDSLEY v. ARKANSAS AND LOUISIANA RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 199. Submitted April 8, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. In equity causes all parties against whom a
Pacific Railroad v. United States
PACIFIC RAILROAD v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 233. Submitted April 15, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. Congress having appropriated in payment of a judgment against the United States in the Court of Claims, the full amo
Johnson v. Sayre
JOHNSON v. SAYRE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA. No. 871. Argued April 18, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. In the Fifth Article of Amendments to the Constitútion of the United States, pro
Ellenwood v. Marietta Chair Co.
ELLENWOOD v. MARIETTA CHAIR COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 234. Argued April 11, 15, 1895. Decided May 6, 1895. By the law of those States of the Union whose jurisprudence is
Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fé Railway Co. v. Hefley
GULF, COLORADO AND SANTA FÉ RAILWAY COMPANY v. HEFLEY. ERROR TO THE COUNTY COURT OF MILAM COUNTY, STATE OF TEXAS. ’ No. 255. Submitted April 4, 1895. Decided April 29, 1895. The Texas statute of May 6, 1882, making it unlawful for a railroa
Whitney v. Taylor
WHITNEY v. TAYLOR. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 278. Argued April 10, 1895. Decided April 29, 1895. In May, 1854, J. settled on a quarter section of public land in California,
Risdon Iron & Locomotive Works v. Medart
RISDON IRON AND LOCOMOTIVE WORKS v. MEDART. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 164. Submitted January 21, 1895, Decided April 22, 1895. Processes of manufacture which involve chem
Du Bois v. Kirk
DU BOIS v. KIRK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 240. Argued April 1, 2, 1895. Decided April 22, 1895. Arthur Kirk was the original inventor of the invention patented to him b
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.