Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1896 Cases
250 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Charless
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CHARLESS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE' NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 184. Argued March 26, 27, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. The general principles of the law of master and servant, as set forth i
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Peterson
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. PETERSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 153. Argued and submitted March 18, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. H. was foreman of an extra gang of laborers for plaintiff in
Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Burnham
GREAT WESTERN TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BURNHAM. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF MILWAUKEE COUNTY, STATE OF WISCONSIN. No. 159. Argued and submitted March 19, 20, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. When the highest court of a State, upon a first appeal
Great Western Telegraph Co. v. Purdy
GREAT WESTERN TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PURDY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 105. Argued December 6, 9, 1895. Decided April 13, 1896. Upon a bill in equity by subscribers for shares in a corporation to compel it to issue s
Hollander v. Fechheimer
HOLLANDER v. FECHHEIMER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OE THE DISTRICT OE COLUMBIA. No. 146. Argued March 13, 16, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. The jurisdiction of this court is to be determined by the amount directly involved in the decree
United States v. Julian
UNITED STATES v. JULIAN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 925. Submitted March 16, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. The jurat attached to a deposition taken before a commissioner of a Circuit Court of tlie United States is not a certificat
Stevenson v. United States
STEVENSON v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 681. Argued March 9, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. On the trial of a person indicted for murder, although the evidence may ap
Woodruff v. Mississippi
WOODRUFF v. MISSISSIPPI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 13. Argued March 9, 10, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. The levee board of Mississippi, being authorized 'by a statute of the State to borrow money and to .i
Davis v. Geissler
DAVIS v. GEISSLER. ERBOE TO THE CIECUIT COUBT OF THE UNITED STATES FOB THE DISTEICT OF KANSAS. No. 185. Argued March 27, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. The Circuit Court having made no certificate to this court of the question of its jurisdi
Seneca Nation v. Christy
SENECA NATION v. CHRISTY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NEW YORK. No. 180. Argued March 26, 1896. Decided April 13, 1896. On the 31st day of August, 1886, the Seneca Ration by treaty and conveyance conveyed away the lands sued
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 321. Argued January 29, 30, 1896. Decided March 30, 1896. . The Interstate Commerce Commission is a bo
Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION. INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION v. CINCINNATI, NEW ORLEANS AND TEXAS PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFT
Telfener v. Russ
TELFENER v. RUSS. CERTIORARI. TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 462. Argued March 2, 3, 1896. Decided March 30, 1896. Under the provisions of the act of the State of Texas of July 14, 1879, amended March 11, 1881, a
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Kentucky
LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 722. Argued January 14, 15, 1896. Decided March 30, 1896. A power given in a charter of a railroad to connect or unite with oth
Pearsall v. Great Northern Railway Co.
PEARSALL v. GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 768. Submitted December 16, 1895. Decided March 30, 1896. In 1856, the Minneapolis and St. Cloud Railroad Comp
Owens v. Henry
OWENS v. HENRY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 143: Argue and submitted March 13, 1896. Decided March 30, 1896. In June, 1861, O. recovered judgment in a Pennsylvania court for the
Stanley v. Schwalby
STANLEY v. SCHWALBY. EEEOE TO THE COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS FOE THE FOURTH SUPREME JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 653. Submitted January 10, 1896. Decided March 23, 1896. Neither the Secretary of War, nor the Attorney General, nor any subordi
Southworth v. United States
SOUTHWORTH v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 652. Argued and submitted March 3, 1896. Decided March 23, 1896. In an action brought by a Circuit Court commissioner for the District of Louisiana to recover fees for allege
Brown v. Walker
BROWN v. WALKER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 765. Argued January 23, 1896. Decided March 23, 1896. The provision in the act of February 11, 1893, c. 83, 27 Stat. 443, “tha
Rouse v. Hornsby
ROUSE v. HORNSBY. error to the circuit court of appeals for the eighth circuit. No. 706. Submitted March 2, 1896. Decided March 23, 1896. The decrees and judgments of Circuit Courts of Appeal are made final by-section 6 of the Judiciary Act
Post v. United States
POST v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 694. Argued March 6, 9, 1896. Decided March 23, 1896. Under the act of July 12, 1894, c. 132, enacting that “ all criminal proceeding
Southern Pacific Railroad v. California
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 560. Argued January 15, 16, 1896. Decided March 16, 1896. Central Pacific Railroad Company v. California, ante 91, affirmed and foll
Central Pacific Railroad v. California
CENTRAL PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CALIFORNIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 559. Argued January 15, 16, 1896. Decided March 16, 1896. The Central Pacific Railroad Company, being required by the laws of Califor
United States v. Texas
UNITED STATES v. TEXAS. ORIGINAL. No. 3. Original. Argued October 23, 24, 25, 1895. Decided March 16, 1896. The treaty between the United States and Spain, made in 1819, and ratified in 1821, provided that “ the boundary line between the tw
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.