Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1896 Cases
250 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Leighton v. United States
LEIGHTON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 413. Argued November 12, 13, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. The party who, under the provisions of § 4 of the act of March 3, 1891, c. 538, 26 Stat. 853, elects to reopen before
Davis v. Elmira Savings Bank
DAVIS v. ELMIRA SAVINGS BANK. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 415. Argued January 13, 14, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. Section 130 of chapter 689 of the laws of New York of 1892, providing for the payment by the
Hamilton v. Brown
HAMILTON v. BROWN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 241. Submitted November 2, 1894. Decided March 2, 1896. Upon proceedings under the statute of Texas of March 20,. 1848, c. 145, for th
Lynch v. Murphy
LYNCH v. MURPHY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 129. Argued December 18, 19, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. Arndt v. Griggs, 134 U. S. 316, affirmed to the point that the duty of determining unsettled questions
Baltzer v. North Carolina
BALTZER AND TAAKS v. NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 52. Argued February 3, 4, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. Baltzer v. North Carolina, ante 240, followed. The case is stated in the opinion. Mr.
Baltzer v. North Carolina
BALTZER v. NORTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA. No. 93. Argued February 3, 4, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. The decision of the Supreme Court of North Carolina, made in an action to-recover on bonds issu
Durham v. Seymour
DURHAM v. SEYMOUR. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 769. Submitted January 13, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. As a claim of invention, made in an application for a patent, is a right incapable of being,ascerta
Ainsa v. United States
AINSA v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 429. Argued October 25, 28, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. In order to the confirmation of a Mexican grant by the Court of Private Land Claims, it must appear not only
Home Insurance & Trust Co. v. Tennessee & Shelby County
Home Insurance and Trust Company v. Tennessee and Shelby County, No. 673. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee.
Planters' Insurance v. Tennessee & Shelby County
Planters’ Insurance Company v. Tennessee and Shelby County, No. 679,
Memphis City Bank v. Tennesse & Shelby County
Memphis City Bank v. Tennesse and Shelby County, No. 675,
Memphis City Bank v. Tennessee ex rel. Memphis
MEMPHIS CITY BANK v. TENNESSEE FOR THE USE OF MEMPHIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 674. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. A corporation organized for the purpose of doing an insurance busi
Phoenix Fire & Marine Insurance v. Tennessee
PHŒNIX FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY v. TENNESSEE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 269. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. A state statute granting to a company incorporated by it “ all the
Mercantile Bank v. Tennessee & Shelby County
Mercantile Bank v. Tennessee and Shelby County, No. 677,
Mercantile Bank v. Tennessee ex rel. Memphis
MERCANTILE BANK v. TENNESSEE, FOR THE USE OF MEMPHIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 676. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. A judicial sale and conveyance, made under order of court, of the f
Shelby County v. Union & Planters' Bank
SHELBY COUNTY v. UNION AND PLANTERS’ BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE. No. 766. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. A clause in the charter by a State of a ba
Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee ex rel. Memphis
BANK OF COMMERCE v. TENNESSEE FOR THE USE OF MEMPHIS. BANK OF COMMERCE v. TENNESSEE AND COUNTY OF SHELBY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. Nos. 668, 669. Argued January 20, 21, 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. The provi
Carey v. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co.
CAREY v. HOUSTON AND TEXAS CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 642. Submitted December 23, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. A bill in equity by a corporation, or by the stockholders of a-
Beebe v. United States
BEEBE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF ALABAMA. No. 71. Argued November 18, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. In Alabama a judgment in itself imposes no lien upon the property of the ju
Fishback v. Pacific Express Co.
William M. Fishback v. The Pacific Express Company. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas. No. 342. Argued with No. 341. Mr. A. H. Garland for appellants. Mr. James P. Clarke and Mr. R. C. G
Fishback v. Western Union Telegraph Co.
FISHBACK v. WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FDR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 341. Argued January 22, 23, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. A Circuit Court of the United States has no j
Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Callaghan
UNION PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CALLAGHAN. ERROR TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 271. Submitted January 22, 1896. Decided March 2, 1896. When the bond, in a case brought here by writ of error, is d
Smith v. United States
SMITH v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 608. Argued November 19, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. Upon a trial for murder, where the question is whether the killing was i
Ball v. Halsell
BALL v. HALSELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 471. Submitted December 18, 1895. Decided March 2, 1896. By the act of February 26,' 1853, c. 81, § 1, (Rev. Stat. § 3477,) every spec
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.