Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1899 Cases
187 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
United States v. Dudley
UNITED STATES v. DUDLEY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 103. Argued April 19, 1899. Decided May, 22, 1899. Sawed boards and plank, planed on one side and grooved, or tongued and grooved, should be cla
McMullen v. Hoffman
McMULLEN v. HOFFMAN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 271. Argued April 27, 28, 1899. Decided May 22, 1899. The city of Portland, in Oregon, proposing to receive bids for the construction of what was cal
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. De Lacey
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. DE LACEY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 154. Argued and submitted January 18, 1899. Decided May 22, 1899. The right of LTett, under whom De Lacey claims, was a right of
McDonald v. Chemical National Bank
McDONALD, Receiver, v. CHEMICAL NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 242. Argued April 13, 1899. Decided May 22, 1899. The several payments and remittances made to the Chemical Bank by the Capi
Columbus Construction Co. v. Crane Co.
COLUMBUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY v. CRANE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 462. Submitted April 17, 1899. Decided May 22, 1899. The judiciary act of March 3, 1891, c. 517, 26 S
West Co. v. Lea
WEST COMPANY v. LEA. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 755. Submitted May 1, 1899. Decided May 22, 1899. As a deed of general assignment for tbe benefit of creditors is made by the bankruptcy act alon
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McCann
MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. McCANN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 11. Argued October 11, 1898. Decided May 22, 1899. Section 944 of the Revised Statutes of Missouri of 1889, provided that, “Whene
United States v. Coe
UNITED STATES v. COE. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF PRIVATE LAND CLAIMS. No. 8 of October term, 1897. Petition for rebearing submitted June 29, 1898. Denied May 22, 1899. A petition for the rehearing of this case, which was decided May 23, 1898,
Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.
LOUISVILLE, NEW ALBANY & CHICAGO RAILWAY COMPANY, Petitioner, v. LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY. SAME v. LOUISVILLE BANKING COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 29, 30. Argued May 4, 5, 1898. Decided May
New Mexico v. United States Trust Co.
NEW MEXICO v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 169. Resubmitted April 17, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The provision in the act of July 27,1866, c. 278, exempting from taxation th
Cohn v. Daley
COHN v. DALEY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 136. Argued and submitted April 4, 5, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. For the reasons stated in the opinion of the court, it is precluded from looking at the so-calle
The Olinde Rodrigues
THE OLINDE RODRIGUES. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 704. Argued April 11, 13, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. A blockade to be binding must be known to exist. There is no rule of law
Wade v. Travis County
WADE v. TRAVIS COUNTY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 267. Argued April 26, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Mitchell County v. Bank of Paducah, 91 Texas, 361, which was an action upon interest coupons on b
Office Specialty Manufacturing Co. v. Fenton Metallic Manufacturing Co.
OFFICE SPECIALTY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. FENTON METALLIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 253. Argued April 20, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Every element of the combination described
Stephens v. Cherokee Nation
STEPHENS v. CHEROKEE NATION. CHOCTAW NATION v. ROBINSON. JOHNSON v. CREEK NATION. CHICKASAW NATION v. ROBINSON. APPEALS FROM THE UNITED STATES COURT IN THE INDIAN TERRITORY. Nos. 423, 453, 461, 496. Argued and submitted February 23, 24, 27,
Louisville v. Bank of Louisville
LOUISVILLE v. BANK OF LOUISVILLE. STONE, Auditor, v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 359, 358. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Stone v. Bank of Commerce,
First National Bank v. Louisville
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF LOUISVILLE v. LOUISVILLE. SAME v. STONE. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 635, 634. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The decision of the co
Louisville v. Citizens' National Bank
LOUISVILLE v. CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK. CITIZENS’ NATIONAL BANK v. STONE, Auditor. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 365, 405. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Thir
Louisville v. Third National Bank
LOUISVILLE v. THIRD NATIONAL BANK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 364. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Third National Bank of Louisville v. Stone, Auditor, ante,
Third National Bank v. Stone
THIRD NATIONAL BANK OF LOUISVILLE v. STONE, Auditor. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 404. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The assertion in this ease of an irrevoc
Fidelity Trust & Safety Vault Co. v. Louisville Trust Co.
FIDELITY TRUST AND SAFETY VAULT COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE. SAME v. STONE, Auditor. LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE. SAME v. STONE, Auditor. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. Nos. 406, 407,
Stone v. Bank of Commerce
STONE v. BANK OF COMMERCE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 362. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Citizens’ Savings Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U. S. 636, followed to th
Stone v. Farmers' Bank
STONE, Auditor, v. FARMERS’ BANK OF KENTUCKY. FARMERS’ BANK OF KENTUCKY v. STONE, Auditor. Nos. 385, 386. Argued February 28, March 2, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The decree below, so far as it granted the relief prayed as against the defen
McDonald v. Williams
McDONALD, Receiver, v. WILLIAMS. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued April 21, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The receiver of a national bank cannot recover a dividend paid to a stockholder not
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.