Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1899 Cases
187 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Israel v. Gale
ISRAEL v. GALE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 265. Argued April 25, 26, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. In this case the trial court at the close of the testimony, which is detailed in the opinion of this cou
United States v. Krall
UNITED STATES v. KRALL. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 216. Argued and submitted April 8, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. On its face the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals in this case is not a final ju
Northern Pacific Railroad v. Freeman
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. FREEMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 241. Argued and submitted April 13, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. A highway in the State of Washington crossed the Northern Pacific
Price v. United States & Osage Indians
PRICE v. UNITED STATES AND OSAGE INDIANS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 247. Argued April 19, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Under the act of March 3, 1891, c. 538, giving the Court of Claims jurisdiction over claims for property of cit
Concord First National Bank v. Hawkins
CONCORD FIRST NATIONAL BANK v. HAWKINS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 187. Argued and submitted January 20, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. Tbe investment by tbe First National Bank of Concord, New Hampshire,
Raton Water Works Co. v. Raton
RATON WATER WORKS COMPANY v. RATON. APPEAL EROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 272. Argued April 28, 1899. Decided May 15, 1899. The water works company contracted with the municipal corporation of Raton to construct
Morris v. United States
MORRIS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 49. Argued October 26, 27, 28, 81, November 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 1898. Decided May 1, 1899. The grant by Charles I to Lord Baltimore on the 20th of June, 1632
Humphries v. District of Columbia
HUMPHRIES v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 230. Argued April 4, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. In tbis case a jury was empanelled, trial had, and the case submitted on the 30th of November,
Bosworth v. St. Louis Terminal Railroad
BOSWORTH v. ST. LOUIS TERMINAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 211. Submitted January 25, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. A claim was presented against the estate of the Peoria and St
McCain v. Des Moines
McCAIN v. DES MOINES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 238. Submitted April 5, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. It appearing on the face of the bill in this case that all the parties to thi
Nelson v. Moloney
NELSON v. MOLONEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 767. Submitted April 17, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. O’Brien being arrested in the State of New York for larceny, Nelson induced Moloney to join him in becoming O’Br
Kimball v. Kimball
KIMBALL v. KIMBALL. ERROR TO THE SURROGATE’S COURT OE THE COUNTY OF KINGS, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 248. Argued April 19, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. If the petition of a woman, claiming to be the widow of a man supposed to have died intestate
Moran v. Dillingham
MORAN v. DILLINGHAM. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 243. Submitted April 17, 1899. Decided May 1, 1899. The provision of the act of 1891, c. 517, § 3, that no judge before whom “ a cause or question ma
United States v. One Distillery
UNITED STATES v. ONE DISTILLERY et al. error to the circuit court of the united states for the southern district of california. No. 190. Argued April 6, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. There was no pro.of in this case to overcome the denials
Auten v. United States National Bank
AUTEN v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 206. Argued.March 9, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. In June, 1892, the United States National Bank of New York, by letter, so
White v. Leovy
WHITE v. LEOVY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 232. Submitted April 3, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. From the statement of this case made by the Supreme Court of Louisiana in its opinion, quoted in the opinion of
Holmes v. Hurst
HOLMES v. HURST. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 124. Argued March 8, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. The serial publication of a book in a monthly magazine, prior to any steps taken toward securing a copy
American Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Hall
AMERICAN REFRIGERATOR TRANSIT COMPANY v. HALL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 226. Argued and submitted March 16, 17, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. It having been settled, by previous decisions of this court, that
Cosgrove v. Winney
COSGROVE v. WINNEY. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 172. Submitted January 19, 1899. Decided April 24, 1899. The appellant, a Canadian, was extradited from Canada under the extra
Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. Matthews
ATCHISON, TOPEKA AND SANTA FÉ RAILROAD COMPANY v. MATTHEWS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 147. Submitted January 18, 1899. Decided April 17, 1899. The provision in § 2 of é. 155 of the acts of Kansas of 1885, entitl
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Smith
LAKE SHORE AND MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. SMITH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 227. Argued March 14, 15, 1899. Decided April 17, 1899. The provision in the act of the legislature of Michigan, No. 90, of
Kirby v. United States
KIRBY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 164. Argued January 20, 1899. Decided April 11, 1899. On the trial of a person charged with feloniously receiving and .having in
Capital Traction Co. v. Hof
CAPITAL TRACTION COMPANY v. HOF. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 108. Argued January 5, 6, 1899. Decided April 11, 1899. This court has jurisdiction to review by writ of error, under the act of February 9, 189
Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro
OWENSBORO NATIONAL BANK v. OWENSBORO. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 148. Argued February 27, 28, 1899. Decided April 3, 1899. A State is wholly without power to levy any tax, either direct or indirect, upon nat
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.