Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1899 Cases
187 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Price v. Forrest
PRICE v. FORREST. ERROR TO THE COURT OF ERRORS AND APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY. No. 105. Argued January 3, 4, 1899. Decided March 6, 1899. In 1850 Price, a purser in the Navy and fiscal agent for that Départment, advanced $75,000 to
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Paul
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. PAUL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 120. Submitted January 10, 1899. Decided March 6, 1899. The act of the legislature of Arkansas of March 25, 1889, entitl
Allen v. Smith
ALLEN v. SMITH. SMITH v. ALLEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 168, 176. Argued January 19, 1899. Decided March 6, 1899. The manufacturer of the sugar, and not the producer of the sugar cane, is the person entitl
United States v. Matthews
UNITED STATES v. MATTHEWS. appeal from the court of claims. No. 79. Argued December 8, 1898. Decided March 6, 1899. The authority conferred upon the Attorney General by the act of March 3, 1891, c. 542, 26 Stat. 985, to offer rewards for th
Venner v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
No. 684. Venner v. Farmers’ Loan and Trust Company. Sixth Circuit. Mr. Alfred Russell for petitioner. Mr. Frederick B. Van Vorst opposing.
Eagle v. Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Co.
No. 671. Eagle v. Pillsbury-Washburn Flour Mills Company (Limited). Seventh Circuit. Mr. Edward O. Brown for petitioner. Mr. Frank F. Reed opposing.
Milburn Gin & Machine Co. v. German Bank
No. 342. Milburn Gin and Machine Company v. German Bank. Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Tennessee. Motions to dismiss or affirm. Submitted January 30, 1899. Decided February 27, 1899. Mr. C. W. Metcalf for motions. Mr. William M
United States v. Johnson
UNITED STATES v. JOHNSON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 59. Submitted November 10, 1898. Decided February 27, 1899. In proceedings taken by a District Attorney of the United States, -by order of t
Ohio v. Thomas
OHIO v. THOMAS. APPEAR FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 353. Argued and submitted January 10, 1899. Decided February 27, 1899. In malting provision for feeding the inmates of the soldiers’ home in Ohio, in accord
Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Johnson
HENRIETTA MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. JOHNSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 139. Submitted January 16, 1899. Decided February 27, 1899. Personal service of a summons, made in the Territory of Arizona upon
First National Bank of Wellington v. Chapman
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF WELLINGTON v. CHAPMAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 137. Argued January 13, 16, 1899. Decided February 27, 1899. The system of taxation adopted in Ohio was not intended to be unfriendly to, or
Dewey v. Des Moines
DEWEY v. DES MOINES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 122. Argued January 11, 12, 1899. Decided February 27, 1899. A resident in and citizen of Chicago in Illinois, was the owner of certain lots in Des Moines in Iowa, wh
New Orleans v. Quinlan
NEW ORLEANS v. QUINLAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR TEE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. No. 343. Submitted December 19, 1898. Decided February 27, 1899. The Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Clayton
TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CLAYTON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 222. Argued January 27, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. The Texas and Pacific Railway Company recéived at Bonham, in Texas, 467
Nugent v. Arizona Improvement Co.
NUGENT v. ARIZONA IMPROVEMENT COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 119. Argued and submitted January 10, 11, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. Under the act of March 8, 1895, of the legislature of the Terri
Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. Ohio
LAKE SHORE & MICHIGAN SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. OHIO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 95. Argued December 13, 1898. Decided February 20, 1899. The statute of Ohio relating to railroad companies, in that State which pr
Gunnison County Commissioners v. Rollins
GUNNISON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. ROLLINS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 178. Argued December 15, 16, 1898. Decided February 20, 1899. Although the bill of exceptions in this ease does not state, in s
Lake County Commissioners v. Dudley
LAKE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS v. DUDLEY. CEETIOBABI TO THE OIBCUIT COÜRT OF APPEALS FOE THE EIGHTH CIEOUIT. No. 177. Argued December 14, 15, 1898. Decided February 20, 1899. The instruments sued on in this case being payable to bearer, and havi
Covington v. Kentucky
COVINGTON v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 152. Submitted January 18, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. This court is bound by the construction put by the highest court of the State of Kentucky upon it
Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. Joy
BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY v. JOY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 129. Submitted January 12, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. An action, pending in the Circuit Court of the United States si
Green Bay & Mississippi Canal Co. v. Patten Paper Co.
GREEN BAY AND MISSISSIPPI CANAL COMPANY v. PATTEN PAPER COMPANY. PETITIONS FOE EEHEAEING. No. 14. Distributed January 16, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. The petitions for rehearing rest upon a misapprehension of the decision in this case,
Merrill v. National Bank of Jacksonville
MERRILL v. NATIONAL BANK OF JACKSONVILLE. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 54, 55. Argued October 20, 21, 1898. Decided February 20, 1899. As the controversy in this case involved the quest
Henrietta Mining & Milling Co. v. Gardner
HENRIETTA MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. GARDNER. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 140. Argued January 16, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. The provisions in the Revised Statutes of Arizona of 1887, c. 42, § 3,
Mullen v. Western Union Beef Co.
MULLEN v. WESTERN UNION BEEF COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 153. Argued and submitted January 18, 1899. Decided February 20, 1899. On the facts stated by the court In its opinion, it declines to hold th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.