Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kenaday v. Sinnott
KENADAY v. SINNOTT. ERROR TO AND APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 66. Argued November 5, 1900. Decided December 24, 1900. Pinal decrees of the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia in respect of final
Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. Ferris
MISSOURI, KANSAS AND TEXAS RAILWAY COMPANY v. FERRIS. error to the court of civil appeals for the third supreme JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF TEXAS. No. 349. Submitted December 3, 1900. Decided December 24, 1900. The-final ruling of the
Arkansas v. Schlierholz
ARKANSAS v. SCHLIERHOLZ. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT. COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS. No. 122. Argued and submitted December 6, 1900. Decided December 24, 1900. The authority of this court to review the action
Joyce v. Auten
JOYCE v. AUTEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH. CIRCUIT. No. 83. Argued November 7, 1900. Decided December 24, 1900. A surety who signs an unconditional promise is not discharged from liability thereon by reason of any
Workman v. New York City
WORKMAN v. NEW YORK CITY, MAYOR, ALDERMEN AND COMMONALTY CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 1. Argued April 17, 1899. Decided December 24, 1900. In June, 1893, the Linda Park was moored to a dock at'pier
Rothschild v. United States
ROTHSCHILD v. UNITED STATES. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 59. Argued October 31, November 1, 1900. Decided December 17, 1900. It is the meaning of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, to subject to d
United States v. Morrison
UNITED STATES v. MORRISON. UNITED STATES v. WOLFF. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOE THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 15, 16. Argued December 12, 1899. Decided December 17, 1900. These cases are concerned with the classification of cer
Reymann Brewing Co. v. Brister
REYMANN BREWING COMPANY v. BRISTER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 76. Submitted November 7, 1900. Decided December 17, 1900. Tbe statute of Ohio, known as the Dow law, S3 Ohio Laws
Bosworth v. Carr, Ryder & Engler Co.
BOSWORTH v. CARR, RYDER & ENGLER COMPANY. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the seventh CIRCUIT. No. 14. Argued October 24, 25, 1899. Decided December 17, 1900. This case having been argued with No. 12, ante, 415, at the same t
Rau v. Bosworth
RAU v. BOSWORTH, RECEIVER. certiorari to the circuit court oe appeals eor the seventh circuit. No. 13. Argued October 24, 25, 1899. Decided December 17, 1900. This case having been argued with No. 12, ante, 415, at the same time, and by the
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Bosworth
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. BOSWORTH, RECEIVER. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the seventh circuit. No. 11. Argued October 24, 25, 1899. Decided December 17, 1900. This case having been argued with No.
Huntting Elevator Co. v. Bosworth
HUNTTING ELEVATOR COMPANY v. BOSWORTH, RECEIVER OF THE CHICAGO, PEORIA AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No 12. Argued October 24, 25, 1899. Decided December 17, 1900. This ca
Tyler v. Judges of the Court of Registration
TYLER v. JUDGES OF THE COURT OF REGISTRATION. ERROR TO THE SUPREME JUDICIAL COURT OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 213. Argued October 25, 1900. Decided December 17, 1900. A petitioner in an application for a writ of prohibition to
Davis v. Burke
DAVIS v. BURKE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF IDAHO. No. 286. Argued December 3, 1960. Decided December 17, 1900. Defendant being convicted of murder, carried the case to the Supreme Court of the Sta
Cincinnati Street Railway Co. v. Snell
CINCINNATI STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. SNELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 110. Argued November 15, 1900. Decided December 17, 1900. The. judgment of a state court, reversing the judgment of an inferior court, bn accou
United States v. Choctaw Nation
UNITED STATES v. CHOCTAW NATION AND CHICKASAW NATION. WICHITA AND AFFILIATED BANDS OF INDIANS v. CHOCTAW NATION, CHICKASAW NATION AND UNITED STATES. CHOCTAW NATION AND CHICKASAW NATION v. UNITED STATES AND WICHITA AND AFFILIATED BANDS OF IN
Loeb v. Columbia Township Trustees
LOEB v. COLUMBIA TOWNSHIP TRUSTEES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO. No. 42. Argued April 27, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. In a case brought here from a Circuit Court, the opinion regula
Gableman v. Peoria, Decatur & Evansville Railway Co.
GABLEMAN v. PEORIA, DECATUR AND EVANSVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 438. Submitted November 16, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. An action against a receiver of a state corp
Mason v. Missouri
MASON v. MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE MISSOURI. No. 258. Argued October 25, 26, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. The Supreme Court of the State of Missouri having decided that the provision of the state constitution
Duluth & Iron Range Railroad v. St. Louis County
DULUTH AND IRON RANGE RAILROAD COMPANY v. ST. LOUIS COUNTY. EBBOE TO THE SUPBEME COUET OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 173. Argued October 17, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. Following the decision and the concurring opinion in Stearns v. M
New York State v. Barker
NEW YORK STATE v. BARKER (NO. 2). ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 52. Argued with No. 51, October 30, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. Same counsel as in No. 51.
New York State v. Barker
NEW YORK STATE v. BARKER. error to the court oe appeals of the state OF NEW YORK. No. 51. Argued October 30, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. In this record there is no averment and no proof of any violation of law by the assessors of New Y
Williams v. Fears
WILLIAMS v. FEARS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. No. 287. Argued October 29, 1900. Decided December 10, 1900. By a general revenue act of the State of Georgia, a specific tax was levied upon many occupations, including
Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. Kentucky
CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. EEEOE TO THE COUET OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 103. Argued November 13, 14, 1900. Decided December 3, 1900. The separate coach law of Kentucky, being operative only within the St
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.