Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Sully v. American National Bank
SULLY v. AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF TENNESSEE. No. 266 of October Term, 1899. Submitted October 9, 1900. Decided October 22, 1900. For reasons stated in the opinion of the court a motion to retax cost
Oregon Railroad & Navigation Co. v. Balfour
OREGON RAILROAD AND NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BALFOUR. OREGON RAILWAY AND NAVIGATION COMPANY v. BALFOUR. APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 73, 74. Submitted October 9, 1900. Decided October 22, 1900. Proceedi
Wiley v. Sinkler
WILEY v. SINKLER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 2. Argued December 8, 1899. Decided October 15, 1900. The right to vote for members of Congress is not derived merely from the constit
Looker v. Maynard
LOOKER v. MAYNARD. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 4. Subniitted December 2,1898. Decided October 15, 1900. A power reserved by the constitution of a state to its legislature, to alter, amend or repeal future acts o
Saxlehner v. Nielsen
SAXLEHNER v. NIELSEN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 33. Argued and submitted March 22, 23, 1900. Decided October 15, 1900. Defendant was prosecuted for selling bitter waters under the name of “ Hunya
Saxlehner v. Siegel-Cooper Co.
SAXLEHNER v. SIEGEL-COOPER COMPANY. SAXLEHNER v. GIES. SAXLEHNER v. MARQUET. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ' Nos. 30, 31, 32. Argued March 22, 23, 1900. Decided October 15, 1900. These eases were argued
Saxlehner v. Eisner & Mendelson Co.
SAXLEHNER v. EISNER & MENDELSON COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 29. Argued March 22, 23, 1900. Decided October 15, 1900. In 1862, plaintiff’s husband discovered a spring of bitter water in Hun
Washburn & Moen Manufacturing Co. v. Reliance Marine Insurance
WASHBURN AND MOEN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. RELIANCE MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 6. Argued March 15, 16, 1899. Decided October 15, 1900. In marine insurance the general rule
White v. Schloerb
WHITE v. SCHLOERB. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 530. Submitted April 26, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. After an adjudication in bankruptcy, an action of replevin in a state court cannot be commenc
Hicks v. Knost
HICKS v. KNOST. certificate from the circuit court of appeals for the SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 512. Submitted May 14, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. A District Court of the United States has jurisdiction, by the proposed defendant’s consent, but not
Mitchell v. McClure
MITCHELL v. McCLURE. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 237. Submitted April 12, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. A District Court of the United States has no jurisdiction, without the
Bardes v. Hawarden Bank
BARDES v. HAWARDEN BANK. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 503. Submitted January 31, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. The provisions of the second clause of section 23 of the Bankrupt Act
Dewey v. United States
DEWEY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 546. Argued April 10, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. In this case it was rightly decided in the court below, that in determining under the provisions of Eev. Stat. sec. 902, whether
Hawley v. Diller
HAWLEY v. DILLER. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 116. Submitted February 2, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. An-applicant for public land under tbe act of Congress of June 3, 1878, 29 Stat. 89, c. 151, known
In re Connaway as Receiver of the Moscow National Bank
In re CONNAWAY AS RECEIVER OF THE MOSCOW NATIONAL BANK. ORIGINAL. No. 9, Original. Submitted April 9, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. A national bank was closed by order of the Comptroller of the Currency and a receiver appointed. An assessment
Deserant v. Cerillos Coal Railroad
DESERANT v. CERILLOS COAL RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE TERRITORY OE NEW MEXICO. No. 269. Argued April 27, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. The act of Congress of March 3, 1891, concerning coal mines, makes three requiremen
Banholzer v. New York Life Insurance
BANHOLZER v. NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 277. Argued and submitted April 27, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. This case is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court of
New York Life Insurance v. Cravens
NEW YORK LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. CRAVENS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSOURI. No. 262. Argued April 25, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. The contract for life insurance in this case, made by a New York insurance company in the
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Clark
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. CLARK. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 256. Argued April 20, 23, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. The record shows that the cause came on for trial without a
Mutual Life Insurance v. Allen
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. ALLEN. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the ninth CIRCUIT. No. 455. Argued March 14, 15, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Sears, ante, 345, followed. The case is sta
Mutual Life Insurance v. Hill
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILL. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE APPEALS EOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 453. Argued March 14, 15, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. This case falls within the same rule as Mutual Life Insurance Co. v. Phinney,
Mutual Life Insurance v. Sears
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. SEARS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 452. Argued March 14, 15, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. In view of what has been already decided in Mutual Life Insurance Company v.
Mutual Life Insurance v. Phinney
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PHINNEY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 12. Argued January 22, 23, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Upon the showing made by the Court of Appeals, it is clear that that cour
Wheeler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
WHEELER v. NEW YORK, NEW HAVEN AND HARTFORD RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF ERRORS OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT. No. 534. Submitted May 14, 1900. Decided May 28, 1900. Under a statute of Connecticut, a contract was entered in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.