Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1900 Cases
232 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Benedict v. United States
BENEDICT v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 435. Argued January 15, 1900. Decided February 26, 1900. Extra compensation received by a District Judge for holding court outside of his own district is no part of his officia
Thormann v. Frame
THORMANN v. FRAME. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE COUNTY OF WAUKESHA STATE Oy WISCONSIN. No. 341. Submitted January 22, 1900. Decided February 26, 1900. The bare appointment of an executor or administrator of a deceased person by the cou
Adirondack Railway Co. v. New York State
ADIRONDACK RAILWAY COMPANY v. NEW YORK STATE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 439. Argued January 15, 16, 1900. Decided February 26, 1900. While the legislative power to amend or repeal a statute cannot be availe
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Bell
FLORIDA CENTRAL AND PENINSULAR RAILROAD COMPANY v. BELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 95. Argued and submitted December 22, 1899. Decided February 26, 1900. As the plaintiffs in the Circuit Court claimed
United States v. Parkhurst-Davis Mercantile Co.
UNITED STATES v. PARKHURST-DAVIS MERCANTILE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR’' THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 130. Submitted January 31, 1900. Decided February 26, 1900. This case comes within the provision of Re
United States v. Lim
UNITED STATES v. MRS. GUE LIM. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT COURT OP THE UNITED . STATES POE THE DISTRICT OP WASHINGTON. No. 123. Submitted January 29, 1900. Decided February 20, 1900. Under the act of July 6, 1884, c. 220, 23 Stat. 115, constr
Roberts v. United States
ROBERTS, Treasurer, v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 86. Argued December 15, 18, 1899. Decided February 6, 1900. A judgment of the Court of Claims, under tbe act of June 16, 1880, c. 243,
United States v. Tennessee & Coosa Railroad
UNITED STATES v. TENNESSEE AND COOSA RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 53. Argued December 12, 13, 1899. Decided February 5, 1900. The grant of public land made to the State of Alabama by
Baltimore & Potomac Railroad v. Cumberland
BALTIMORE & POTOMAC RAILROAD COMPANY v. CUMBERLAND. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 87. Argued December 19, 1899. Decided February 5, 1900. Under a regulation requiring railroad tracks running through the stre
Lackawanna Iron & Coal Co. v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.
LACKAWANNA IRON AND COAL COMPANY v. FARMERS’ LOAN AND TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE ■ APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH . CIRCUIT. No. 22. Argued March 10, 1899. Decided January 29, 1900. The principles announced in Southern Railway
Southern Railway Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. CARNEGIE STEEL COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 8. Argued October 18, 14, 1898. Decided January 29, 1900. In a decree for the foreclosure and sale of a railroad prop
Toledo, St. Louis & Kansas City Railroad v. Continental Trust Co.
TOLEDO, ST. LOUIS & KANSAS CITY RAILROAD COMPANY v. CONTINENTAL TRUST COMPANY. ROSE v. CONTINENTAL TRUST COMPANY. PETITIONS FOE OEETIOEAEI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 500, 501. Submitted January 22, 1900. Dec
United States v. Bellingham Bay Boom Co.
UNITED STATES v. BELLINGHAM BAY BOOM COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 21. Submitted December 15, 1890. Decided January 29, 1900. The power of Congress to pass laws for the navigation of public riv
Glass v. Concordia Parish Police Jury
GLASS v. CONCORDIA PARISH POLICE JURY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. ■ No. 229. Submitted January 8, 1900. Decided January 29, 1900. The warrants and orders sued on in this case were
Dickerman v. Northern Trust Co.
DICKERMAN v. NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS EOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 33. Argued April 5, 6, 1899. Decided January 22, 1900. A mortgage, given to secure a large number of bonds, provided that the bonds
Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Tompkins
CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY v. TOMPKINS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH DAKOTA. No. 131. Argued October 81, November 1, 1899. Decided January 22, 1900. The State of South Dak
Chew Hing Lung v. Wise
CHEW HING LUNG v. WISE, COLLECTOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 36. Argued December 11, 12,1899. Decided January 22, 1900. Tapioca flour, is not a preparation fit for use as starcn, and under the tar
Rae v. Homestead Loan & Guaranty Co.
RAE v. HOMESTEAD LOAN AND GUARANTY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 261. Submitted December 18, 1899. Decided January 22, 1900. The plaintiff in error executed and delivered to the defendant in error a bond
Lindsay & Phelps Co. v. Mullen
LINDSAY AND PHELPS COMPANY v. MULLEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES- FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 44. Argued April 6, 7, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. The provision in § 2400 of the statutes of Minnesota of 1894, r
Clark v. Kansas City
CLARK v. KANSAS CITY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 268. Argued November 18, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. The provision in section 1 of chapter 7i of the Laws of Kansas of 1891, authorizing certain first-class ci
The New Foundland
THE NEW FOUNDLAND. .APPEAL PROM The district court of the united states for THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 156. Argued November 8, 6, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. The question in this case is as to the adequacy of the proof offered
New Orleans v. Warner
NEW ORLEANS v. WARNER. PETITION FOE LIMITED REHEARING OF THE CASE REPORTED IN 176 U. S. AT PAGE 120. No. 172. Distributed November 29, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. The decree heretofore entered in this case is vacated, and a new decree i
Bolln v. Nebraska
BOLLN v. NEBRASKA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE NEBRASKA. No. 393. Argued December 4, 5, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. A law of Nebraska permitting the prosecution of felonies by information is not in violation of the Consti
Cruickshank v. Bidwell
CRUICKSHANK v. BIDWELL. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 232. Argued November 10, 18, 1899. Decided January 15, 1900. The mere fact that a law is unconstitutional does not entitle
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.