Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1901 Cases
177 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Yazoo & Mississippi Railroad v. Adams
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. BBROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 80. Submitted October 22,1900. Decided January 7, 1901. A writ of error to the Supreme Court of a State cannot be sustained when th
Illinois Central Railroad v. Adams
ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI. No
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad v. Adams
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILROAD COMPANY v. ADAMS. SAME v. SAME. error to the supreme court OF THE S'W .'E- OF MISSISSIPPI. Nos. 355, 356. Argued October 22, 23, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. These oases do not differ materially from
Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railway Co. v. Adams
YAZOO AND MISSISSIPPI VALLEY RAILWAY CO. v. ADAMS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 35. Argued October 22,23,1900. Decided January 7, 1901. An action was begun in a state court for taxes. Defendants pleaded in bar
Elgin National Watch Co. v. Illinois Watch Case Co.
ELGIN NATIONAL WATCH COMPANY v. ILLINOIS WATCH CASE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 121. Argued December 5, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. The term trade mark means a distinctive mark of authen
Patton v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.
PATTON v. TEXAS AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 123. Argued December 6, 7, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. The plaintiff, an employé of the railway company, was injured while at w
Dooley v. Hadden
DOOLEY v. HADDEN. HADDEN v. DOOLEY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT' COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Nos. 96, 99. Argued November 9, 12, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. In' July, 1895, Harold F. Hadden and James E. S. Hadden brought an act
Southern Railway Co. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co.
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. POSTAL TELEGRAPH-CABLE COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE OIEOUIT OOUET OF APPEALS FOE THE FOURTH CIRCUIT. No. 64. Argued November 2, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. Luxton v. North River Bridge Company, 147 U. S. 337, is deci
Board of Liquidation v. Louisiana
BOARD OF LIQUIDATION OF NEW ORLEANS v. LOUISIANA. DRAINAGE COMMISSION OF NEW ORLEANS v. WILDER. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 114, 119. Argued December 4, 5, 1900. Decided January 7, 1901. Without implying that
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.