Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1901 Cases
177 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Rogers Park Water Co. v. Fergus
ROGERS PARK WATER COMPANY v. FERGUS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 56. Argued and submitted October 31,1900. Decided March 25, 1901. So far as the contentions in this case are the same as those passed upon in Free
Danville Water Co. v. Danville City
DANVILLE WATER COMPANY v. DANVILLE CITY. error to the supreme court of THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 373. Submitted November 12; 1900. Decided March 25, 1901. The judgment below is affirmed on the authority of Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport Ci
Freeport Water Co. v. Freeport City
FREEPORT WATER COMPANY v. FREEPORT CITY. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 348. Submitted October 31,1900. Decided March 25, 1901. Tbe water company was a corporation organized under general statutes of Illinois, as w
Throckmorton v. Holt
THROCKMORTON v. HOLT. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 21. Argued December 7,10,1900. Decided March 25, 1901. At the trial of this case before the jury, the main issue was upon the validity of the will of Adjut
In re McKenzie
In re ALEXANDER McKENZIE, PETITIONER. ORIGINAL. No. . Original. Submitted February 26,1901. Decided March 25, 1901. The writ of habeas corpus cannot be made use of as a writ of error, and when applied for to relieve from restraint in punish
Mountain View Mining & Milling Co. v. McFadden
MOUNTAIN VIEW MINING AND MILLING COMPANY v. McFADDEN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 162. Submitted March 5,1901. Decided March 25, 1901. Blackburn v. Portland Gold Mining Company, 175 U. S. 571, and Sho
Wilkes County v. Coler
WILKES COUNTY v. COLER. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH ' CIRCUIT. No, 167. Argued October ID, 22,1000. Decided March 18, 1901. The decisions of the highest court of a State upon the question whether a particula
Minnesota v. Brundage
MINNESOTA v. BRUNDAGE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA. No. 159. Argued February 28,1901. Decided March 18, 1901. The principle reaffirmed that when the petitioner is in custody by state auth
Magruder v. Armes
MAGRUDER v. ARMES. EBKOR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 171. 4-rguad and submitted March 7,1901. Decided March 18, 1901. Jurisdiction cannot be vested in this court, in a case brought here by writ of error to the c
Li Sing v. United States
LI SING v. UNITED STATES. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 27. Argued April 18,19,1900. Decided March 18, 1901. Li Sing was a Chinaman who, after residing for years in the United States, returned tempor
Thompson v. Ferry
THOMPSON v. FERRY. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 144. 'Submitted February 25,1901. Decided March 18, 1901. This appeal being from the judgment of a territorial court and no exceptions to the rulings of the c
Mitchell v. Furman
MITCHELL, GOVERNOR, AND BLOXHAM, COMPTROLLER, OF FLORIDA, v. FURMAN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP FLORIDA. No. 23. Argued October 17, 18, 1800. Decided March 11, 1901. The record considered
Mitchell v. First National Bank
MITCHELL v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO. certiorari to the circuit court of appeals for the second circuit. Argued October 11,12, 1900. Decided March 5, 1901. Whatever may be the nature of a question presented for judicial determination
W. W. Cargill Co. v. Minnesota
W. W. CARGILL CO. v. MINNESOTA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 116. Argued and submitted December 3, i, 1900. Decided March 5, 1901. Chapter 148 of the General Laws of Minnesota for the year 1895, entitled “an act
Hobbs v. Beach
HOBBS v. BEACH. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT. No. 139. Argued January 16,17, ¿900. Decided March 5, 1901. The first three and sixth claims of reissued letters patent No. 11,167 to Fred H. Beach for a mach
Johns v. Wilson
JOHNS v. WILSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 67. Submitted November 11, 1960. Decided March 1, 1901. Under the practice in Arizona the grantee of a mortgagor, who has agreed to pay the notes secured by the
Wheless v. St. Louis
WHELESS v. ST. LOUIS et al. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No. 161. Argued and submitted January 31, February 1,1901. Decided February 25, 1901. When owners of lots in a city file a
Rice v. Ames
RICE v. AMES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS.- No. 420. Submitted December 17, 1900. Decided February 25, 1901. An appeal lies directly to this court from a judgment of the District Co
Gardner v. Bonestell
GARDNER v. BONESTELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 143. Argued January 17,18,1901. Decided February 25, 1901. It is a well settled rule of law tliat tlie power to make and correct surveys of the public lands be
Bird v. United States
BIRD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OB THE UNITED STATES BOR THE DIS- ' TKICT OB' ALASKA. No. 278. Argued January 21,1901. Decided February 25, 1901. Bird was indicted for murder. The killing was admitted, but it was claimed
United States v. Beebe
UNITED STATES v. BEEBE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued November 6,7, 1900. Decided February 25, 1901. It is entirely plain that there was no fraud in this case, and therefore this ground for t
Blythe v. Hinckley
BLYTHE v. HINCKLEY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OE CALIFORNIA. No. 347. Submitted January 14,1901. Decided February 25, 1901. The motion to dismiss this case for lack of jurisdiction must be denied, because the question was duly
New Orleans Debenture Redemption Co. v. Louisiana
NEW ORLEANS DEBENTURE REDEMPTION COMPANY v. LOUISIANA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 129. Argued December 13,14,1900. Decided February 25, 1901. T’or tlie purpose of procuring a decree enjoining a corporation fro
Marx v. Ebner
MARX v. EBNER. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. No. 126. Argued January 22, 1901. Decided February 25, 1901. ' Under section 56 of the Oregon Code referred to in the opinion of the court as in
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.