Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1902 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Louisville Trust Co. v. Comingor
LOUISVILLE TRUST COMPANY v. COMINGOR. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 309. Submitted April 29,1901. Decided January 27, 1902. A general assignment for the benefit of creditors had been made under the st
Mueller v. Nugent
MUELLER v. NUGENT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT Off APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 257. Argued and submitted November 13,1901. Decided January 20, 1902. Referees in bankruptcy exercise much of the judicial authority of the eourt of b
Groeck v. Southern Pacific Railroad
GROECK v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT, OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 82. Argued December 5, 6, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. This case was argued and submitted with Southern Pacific Railroad Co
Southern Pacific Railroad v. Bell
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. BELL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OR THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 20. Argued and submitted December 5, 6, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. The Atlantic and Pacific Railroad Company took no title to lands w
Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Moore
SUN PRINTING AND PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION v. MOORE. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 49. Argued October 24, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. The trustees of The Sun Association are to be charged with knowl
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Callender
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. CALLENDER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 78. Argued December 3, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. This action was brought by defendants in error to recover the value of 18
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Reiss
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. REISS. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OS' APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 77. Argued November 27, December 2, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. Where goods are carried by connecting railways, as between inte
Midway Co. v. Eaton
MIDWAY COMPANY v. EATON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 81. Argued December 4, 5, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. This caséis affirmed on the authority of Midway Company^. JEutoii> ante¡ 602. The case is stated in
Midway Co. v. Eaton
MIDWAY COMPANY v. EATON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 80. Argued December 4, 5, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. Under the act of July 17, 1854, c. 83, 10 Stat. 304, Sioux half-breed certificates were issued to O
Nutting v. Massachusetts
NUTTING v. MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OE THE STATE OE MASSACHUSETTS. No. 32. Argued November 20, 21, 1901. Decided January 13, 1902. The statute of Massachusetts of 1894, e. 522, § 98, imposing a fine on “ any person who sha
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Eaton
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY CO. v. EATON. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. No. 57. Argued October 25, 1901. Decided January 9, 1802. Chicago, Rc/pk Island and Pacific Railway Co. v. Zernecke, ante, 682, affi
United States Repair & Guarantee Co. v. Assyrian Asphalt Co.
UNITED STATES REPAIR AND GUARANTEE COMPANY v. ASSYRIAN ASPHALT COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOB THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 61. Argued October 28, 29, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. Patent No. 501,537, for an improved method of
Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. Zernecke
CHICAGO, ROCK ISLAND AND PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ZERNECKE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OP NEBRASKA. No. 58. Argued October 25, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. Section 3 of the Compiled Laws of Nebraska of 1889, c. 72, providin
Maese v. Herman
MAESE v. HERMAN. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 226. Argued November 6, 7, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. The sole authority to the General Land Office to issue the patent for the land in dispute in this c
McKinley Creek Mining Co. v. Alaska United Mining Co.
McKINLEY CREEK MINING CO. v. ALASKA UNITED MINING CO. APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA. - No. 37. Argued April 13, 16, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. There is no prejudicial error in the ruling
Minder v. Georgia
MINDER v. GEORGIA. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OE BIBB COUNTY, STATE OE GEORGIA. No. 417. Argued December 3, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. This court cannot interfere with the administration of justice in the State of Georgia because it is
Ex parte Wilder's Steamship Co.
Ex parte WILDER’S STEAMSHIP COMPANY. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS. No. 9. Original. Submitted May 13, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. A decree in admiralty in the Supreme Court of the Territory of Hawaii, in a case pending in the courts of
United States Trust Co. v. New Mexico
UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY v. NEW MEXICO. NEW MEXICO v. UNITED STATES TRUST COMPANY. CROSS APPEALS FROM THE SUPKEME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. Nos. 181, 182. Argued October 30, 31, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. An agreed statem
Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States
SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CROSS APPEALS EBOM THE CIBOUIT COUBT OE APPEALS EOB THE NINTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 18 and 24. Argued January 29, 30, 1901. Decided January 6, 1
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Kentucky
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 7. Argued November 9, 1900. Decided January 6, 1902. The question of the validity of the constitution and laws of Kentucky, u
McChord v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
McCHORD v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. McCHORD v. LOUISVILLE, HENDERSON AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY. McCHORD v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. McCHORD v. SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY IN KENTUCKY. McCHORD v. CINCINNATI, NE
Florida Central & Peninsular Railroad v. Reynolds
FLORIDA CENTRAL AND PENINSULAR RAILROAD COMPANY v. REYNOLDS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OF FLORIDA. No. 183. Argued November 5, 6, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. There is nothing in the Federal Constitution -which forbids a Sta
Tucker v. Alexandroff
TUCKER v. ALEXANDROFF. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COITRT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 303. Argued November 15, 18, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. Alexandroff, a conscript in tbe Russian naval service, was sent as one of a detail of
Guarantee Co. of North America v. Mechanics' Savings Bank & Trust Co.
GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA v. MECHANICS’ SAVINGS BANK AND TRUST COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT OOURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Argued April 23, 24, 1901. Decided January 6, 1902. Where a bond insuri
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.