Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Pacific Coast Steamship Co. v. United States
PACIFIC COAST STEAMSHIP COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. SAME v. SAME. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES EOR THE DISTRICT OE ALASKA. Nos. 29, 30, 31. Argued December 8, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. Affirmed on au
Pacific Steam Whaling Co. v. United States
PACIFIC STEAM WHALING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE DISTRICT C0URT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT" OF ALASKA. No. 26. Argued December 8, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. Where an applicant flies with the District Court of A
Oshkosh Waterworks Co. v. Oshkosh
OSHKOSH WATERWORKS COMPANY v. OSHKOSH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE STATE OE WISCONSIN. No. 74. Argued November 6, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. 1. While, in a general sense, the laws in force at the time a contract is made enter into
United States v. Sampson
UNITED STATES v. SAMPSON. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 273. Petition for new parties submitted December 29, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. Where'a rear admiral of the United States Navy who has filed a libe
Mexican Central Railway Co. v. Eckman
MEXICAN CENTRAL RAILWAY COMPANY v. ECKMAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS. No. 124. Submitted. December 17, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. 1. The jurisdiction referred to in the first subdi
Cary Manufacturing Co. v. Acme Flexible Clasp Co.
CARY MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. ACME FLEXIBLE CLASP COMPANY. EEEOE TO THE OIECUIT COUET OE APPEALS EOE 'THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 122. Submitted December 17, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. Judgments and decrees of the Circuit Court of Appeals i
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Borough of New Hope
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. BOROUGH OF NEW HOPE. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR OOTJRT OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA. No. 101, Argued December 2, 3, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. An ordinance of the borough of New Hope, Pennsylvania, imposing
Young Women's Christian Home v. French
YOUNG WOMEN’S CHRISTIAN HOME v. FRENCH. FAUL v. FRENCH. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 73, 74. Argued November 5, 6, 1902. Decided January 5, 1903. By her last will 'and testament Mrs. Sophia Rhodes prov
Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. Hillmon
CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. HILLMON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 94. Argued November 13,14,1902. Decided January 2, 1903. Where two cases, brought by the same plaintiff, against di
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.