Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1903 Cases
273 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Calumet Grain & Elevator Co. v. Chicago
CALUMET GRAIN AND ELEVATOR COMPANY v. CHICAGO. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 135. Submitted December 19,1002. Decided February 23, 1903. Same counsel as in No. 136, see p. 410,
Cummings v. Chicago
CUMMINGS v. CHICAGO. APPEAL FROM THE CIR0UIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 136. Submitted December 19, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. 1. The plaintiffs by their complaint asserted a right, under the
Bigby v. United States
BIGBY v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OE THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 111. Argued December 4, 5, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. There is no contract, express or implied, which can be made the ba
Louisville & Jeffersonville Ferry Co. v. Kentucky
LOUISVILLE AND JEFFERSONVILLE FERRY COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATIC OF KENTUCKY. No. 17. Argued December 8, 9,1002. Decided February 23, 1903. A franchise granted by the proper authorities of Indiana, for ma
Francis v. United States
FRANCIS v. UNITED STATES. OEETIOEAEI TO THE CIBCUIT COÜET OF APPEALS FOE THE SIXTH CIECUIT. No. 80. Argued December 15,16,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. A slip retained by the agent of a lottery which is the duplicate of a slip retained b
Lottery Case
LOTTERY CASE. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT ÓF ILLINOIS. No. 2. Argued December 15,16,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. Lottery tickets are subjects of traffic among those who choose to buy and
Hooker v. Los Angeles
HOOKER v. LOS ANGELES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 149. Argued January 23,1903. Decided February 23, 1903. Where the controversy, in the state court does not involve the construction of the treaty of 1848 with
Mutual Life Insurance v. McGrew
MUTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. McGREW. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA. No. 109. Argued January ID, 16,1902. Decided February 23, 1903. To maintain a writ of error asserted under the third of the classes of cases enu
The Infanta Maria Teresa
THE INFANTA MARIA TERESA. APPEAL PEOM THE SUPEEME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 273. Argued October 27, 28, 1902. Decided February 23, 1903. The Spanish war vessel Infanta Maria Teresa at the engagement at Santiago on July'3, 1898,
Galvin v. City of Grand Rapids
No. 571. James Galvin, Petitioner, v. City of Grand Rapids. February 2, 1903. Mr. Timothy E. Tarsney for the petitioner. No appearance for respondent.
Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.
BLEISTEIN v. DONALDSON LITHOGRAPHING COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COUKT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCÜIT. No. 117. Argued Decided February 2, 1903. Chromolithographs representing actual groups of persons and things, which have been designe
Easton v. Iowa
EASTON v. IOWA. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OF THE STATE OF IOWA. No. 92. Argued January 14,15,1903. Decided February 2, 1903. Congress having power to create a system of national banks, is the judge as to the extent of the powers which shou
Swann v. West Virginia
No. 68. John S. Swann et al., Trustees, etc., Plaintiffs in Error, v. State of West Virginia. In error to the Supreme Court of Appeals of the State of West Yirginia. Submitted December 8,1'02. Decided January 26, 1903. Mr. George E. Price a
Blackstone v. Miller
BLACKSTONE v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE SÜRROGATE’s COURT OF NEW YORK COUNTY, STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 423. Argued January 5, 6,1903. Decided January 26, 1903. Where a deposit made by a citizen of Illinois in a Trust Company in the City of New Yor
Beals v. Cone
BEALS v. CONE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF COLORADO. No. 84. Argued November 11,12,1802. Decided January 26, 1903. There is no general right to a writ of error from this court to the courts of a State; nor does the mere fact
Smythe v. United States
SMYTHE v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 88. Argued November 12,1902. Decided January 26, 1903. An action upon the official bond of a superintendent of the Mint at New Orleans, conditioned am
Nelson v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.
NELSON v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON. No. 44. Argued October 16,17,1902. Decided January 26, 1903. The.grant of public lands made by the act of July 2, 1864, c. 217, to the Northe
The Manila Prize Cases
THE MANILA PRIZE CASES. APPEALS PROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 309,310,311. Argued October 28, 29,1902 Decided January 23, 1903. While the right of the citizen to demand condemnation of vessels or prop, erty as pri
Wyman v. Herard
No. 154. W. F. Wyman, Appellant, v. Virgile Herard. January 22, 1903. Mr. George Chandler for the appellant. Mr. Jolm W. Shartel for tl\e appellee.
Standard Sewing Machine Co. v. Leslie
No. 546. Standard Sewing Machine Company, Petitioner, v. Arthur M. Leslie. January 19, 1903. Mr. Charles S. Holt and Mr. John Dane, Jr., for the petitioner. Mr. Charles K. Ojjidd and Mr. Cha/rles C. Linthicum for. the respondent.
American Colortype Co. v. Continental Colortype Co.
AMERICAN COLORTYPE COMPANY v. CONTINENTAL COLORTYPE COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COÜRT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE . NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 440. Submitted December 22, 1902. — Decided January 19, 1903. An Illinois corporati
Billings v. Illinois
BILLINGS v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME C0URT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 106. Argued December 4, 1902. — Decided January 19, 1903. The claim that section 2 of theact providing for the taxation of life estates, as construed by the high
Diamond Match Co. v. Ontonagon
DIAMOND MATCH COMPANY v. ONTONAGON. APPEAL PROM THE CIROÜIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OP MICHIGAN. No. 96. Argued December 1, 1902. — Decided January 19, 1903. 1. The village of Ontonagon, Michigan, has power, eith
Hale v. Allinson
HALE v. ALLINSON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 77. Argued November 6, 7, 1D02. Decided January 19, 1903. 1. As construed by the highest court of Minnesota the statutes of that State do not provide th
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.