Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Carstairs v. Cochran
CARSTAIRS v. COCHRAN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS-OF THE STATU OF MARYLAND. No. 122. Argued January 13,14,1901. Decided February 23, 1904. That a'statute does not conflict with the constitution of a State is settled by-the decision of its
United States v. Northern Pacific Railroad
UNITED STATES v. NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. • No. 145. Argued January 5,1904. Decided February 23, 1904. 'The act of.July 2, 1864, granting lands to the Northern Paci
Adams v. New York
ADAMS v. NEW YORK. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP 'THE STATE OP NEW YORK. . No. 504 Argued January 27, 1901. .Decided February 23, 1904. The fact that papers, which are pertinent to the issue, may have been illegally taken from the possessio
Wedding v. Metler
WEDDING v. METLER. ERROR TO THE WARREN CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 125. Argued January 14, 15, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Under the statute passed in 1789 by Virginia, known as the “.Virginia Compact,” and the act of C
Central Stock Yards Co. v. Louisville & Nashville Railway Co.
CENTRAL STOCK YARDS COMPANY v. LOUISVILLE & NASHVILLE RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FEOM THE CIRCUIT COUET OE APPEALS EOE THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. ' No. 149. Argued January 28, 29, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Neither the act of Congress of Februar
Ex parte Frasch
Ex Parte FRASCH. PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 13. Original. Argued December 18, 21, 1903. Decided February 23, 1904. Mandamus to the Commissioner, and not to the Court of Appeals of
United States ex rel. Steinmetz v. Allen
UNITED STATES ex rel. STEINMETZ v. ALLEN. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 383. Argued January 12, 13, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. A rulé of practice in the Patent Office when established by the Commission
United States v. St. Anthony Railroad
UNITED STATES v. ST. ANTHONY RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 147. Argued January 28,1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Although a liberal construction of a statute may be proper and desirable
American Steel & Wire Co. v. Speed
AMERICAN STEEL & WIRE COMPANY v. SPEED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. No. 356. Submitted January 11, 1901. Decided February 23, 1904. In a constitutional sense “imports” embrace only goods' brought from a foreign cou
Buttfield v. United States
BUTTFIELD v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 516. Argued January 4, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Decided on authority of Buttfield y. Stranahan, ante, p. 470. Mr.
Buttfield v. Bidwell
BUTTFIELD v. BIDWELL. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT.OF NEW YORK-. No. 296. Argued January 4, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Decided on authority of Buttfield v. Stranahan, ante, p. 470. Mr. Jame
Buttfield v. Stranahan
BUTTFIELD v. STRANAHAN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT' OF NEW YORK. No. 294. Argued January 4, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Every intendment is in favor of the validity of a statute and it mus
St. Clair County v. Interstate Sand & Car Transfer Co.
ST. CLAIR COUNTY v. INTERSTATE SAND AND CAR TRANSFER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 17. Argued March 19, 1903. Decided February 23,1904. Conceding,- arguendo, that the pol
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Adams
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. ADAMS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 143. Argued January 25, 26, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. When a railroad company gives gratuitously, and a passenger accept
Cornell v. Coyne
CORNELL v. COYNE. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 113. Argued January 18, 19, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. The prohibition in the Constitution against taxes or duties on exports
Spreckels Sugar Refining Co. v. McClain
SPRECKELS SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. McCLAIN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 103. Argued December 3,1903. Decided February 23,1904. 1. Subdivision 4, section 629, Rev. Stat., was not superseded by the Judici
Brunswick Terminal Co. v. National Bank
BRUNSWICK TERMINAL COMPANY v. NATIONAL BANK OF BALTIMORE. Certiorari to the circuit court op appeals por the fourth CIRCUIT. No. 88. Argued December 9, 10, 1903. Decided February 23, 1904. The additional liability of the shareholders of cor
Bankers Mutual Casualty Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Sainte Marie Railway Co.
BANKERS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. MINNEAPOLIS, ST. PAUL AND SAULT SAINTE MARIE RAILWAY COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 141. Argued January 22, 1904. Decided February 23, 1904. Although suits may i
Thomas v. United States
THOMAS v. UNITED STATES. Error to the .circuit court of the united states for the SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 43. Argued December 4, 1903. Decided February 23, 1904. The words duties, imposts and excises were used comprehensively in
United States v. California & Oregon Land Co.
UNITED STATES v. CALIFORNIA AND OREGON LAND COMPANY. CALIFORNIA AND OREGON LAND COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON. Nos. 4, 5. Argued March 14, 17, 1902. Reargued Decembe
South Dakota v. North Carolina
SOUTH DAKOTA v. NORTH CAROLINA. IN THE SUPREME COURT OP THE UNITED STATES. No. 8. Original. Argued April 13, 14, 15, 1903; reargued January 8, 11, 12, 1904. Decided February 1, 1904. This court has jurisdiction over an action brought by one
Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Cramer
SINGER MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. CRAMER. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 18. Argued March 18, 19, 1903. Decided February 1, 1904. Where it appears from the face of the patents that extrinsic evidence is
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Summers
No. 531. Louisville and Nashville Railroad Company, Petitioner, v. J. M. Summers, Administrator, etc. January 25, 1904. Petition for a writ of certiorari to the United States Circuit Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit denied. Mr. J. W.
Chesebrough v. United States
CHESEBROUGH v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK. No. 152. Argued December 3, 4, 1903. Decided January 25, 1904. ' Texas paid voluntarily cannot be recovered back, and paym
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.