Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1904 Cases
244 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Missouri v. Nebraska
MISSOURI v. NEBRASKA. NEBRASKA v. MISSOURI. IN EQUITY. ON BILK AND CROSS BILL. No. 5, Original. Submitted November 28, 1904. Decided December 19, 1904. Decree entered March 5, 1905. Final Decree entered in accordance with opinion delivered
Lombard v. Anglo-American Land Mortgage & Agency Co.
No. 454. No. 455. No. 456. No. 457. James L. Lombard, Petitioner, v. Anglo-American Land Mortgage and Agency Company (Limited); B. Lombard, Jr., Petitioner, v. Anglo-American Land Mortgage and Agency Company (Limited); Cheshire Provident In
Hartwell v. Havighorst
No. 106. Samuel A. V. Hartwell, Appellant, v. John H. Havighorst. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. Argued December 15, 1904. Decided December 19, 1904. Case reported below 11 Oklahoma, 189, and see Paine v. Foster
Harding v. Illinois
HARDING v. ILLINOIS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS. No. 61. Submitted November 10, 1904. Decided December 19, 1904. This court has no general power to review or correct the decisions of the highest state court and in c
Wetmore v. Markoe
WETMORE v. MARKOE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 56. Argued November 9, 10, 1904.- Decided December 19, 1904. A husband owes the duty of supporting his wife and children not because of contractual relations with t
Lee v. Robinson
LEE v. ROBINSON. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATE» FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 8. Argued December 6, 7, 1904.— Decided December 19, 1904. Article IX, § 10, of the constitution of South Carolina of 1868, forbidding,
Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Swearingen
TEXAS & PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. SWEARINGEN. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 48. Submitted November 3, 1904.— Decided December 19, 1904. An employé is entitled to assume that his employer has used due care
Hunt v. Springfield Fire & Marine Insurance
HUNT v. SPRINGFIELD FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 65. Argued December 1, 2, 1904.— Decided December 19, 1904. A policy of insurance provided that it should be void if the i
Keely v. Moore
KEELY v. MOORE. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 55. Argued November 9, 1904.— Decided December 19, 1904. The signature of a resident of the District of Columbia to a will executed abroad was witnessed on the d
Missouri v. Nebraska
MISSOURI v. NEBRASKA. NEBRASKA v. MISSOURI. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES. No. 5, Original. Submitted November 28, 1904,- Decided December 19, 1904. Accretion is the gradual accumulation by alluvial formation and where a boundar
Johnson v. Southern Pacific Co.
JOHNSON v. SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY. SAME v. SAME. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 32, 87. Argued October 31, 1904.- Decided December 19, 1904. 1. Statutes in derogation of the common law an
St. Louis Expanded Metal Fireproofing Co. v. Standard Fireproofing Co.
No. 179. St. Louis Expanded Metal Fireproofing Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Standard Fireproofing Company. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Missouri. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted December 5, 1904: Decided December
Bullis v. O'Beirne
BULLIS v. O’BEIRNE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. No. 60. Argued November, 10, 11, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. On writ of error to a state court reviewing its refusal to cancel a judgment after discharge of the d
Ex parte The Republic of Colombia
Ex parte THE REPUBLIC OF COLOMBIA. In the Supreme Court of the United States: PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 13, Original. Argued November 28, 1904. De
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No. 90. Argued October 19, 20, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. Western Union Tel. Co. v. Pennsylvania R. R. Co.
Western Union Telegraph Co. v. Pennsylvania Railroad
WESTERN UNION TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. PENNSYLVANIA RAILROAD COMPANY et al. APPEAL FROM AND ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. Nos. 89, 199. Argued October 19, 20, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. The a
United States v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.
UNITED STATES v. CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE AND ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 54. Submitted November 4, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. Where it does not appear that one claiming* to
City of San Juan v. St. John's Gas Co.
CITY OF SAN JUAN v. ST. JOHN’S GAS COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 41. Argued November 3, 1904. Decided December 12, 1904. Under both the common and the civil law, in th
Humbird v. Avery
HUMBIRD v. AVERY. CERTIFICATE FROM AND ORDER TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 7. Argued October 23, 26, 1903. Decided December 12, 1904. The act of Congress of July 1, 1898, 30 Stat. 597, 620, c. 546, relating to
Dodge v. Ellis
No. 219. Charles F. Dodge, Appellant, v. George Ellis and John J. Herlihy. Appeal from the District Court of the United' States for the' Southern District of Texas. Motions, to dismiss or affirm submitted November 14, 1904. Decided December
United States v. Martinez
UNITED STATES AND THE KIOWA INDIANS v. MARTINEZ. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 15. Argued October 21, 22, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. In an action brought under the Indian Depredation Act of March, 3 1891, 26 Stat. 851, a tribe o
Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. American Trading Co.
NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY v. AMERICAN TRADING COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 24. Argued October 26, 27, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. A shipper in New'York, after stating
Lockhart v. Leeds
LOCKHART v. LEEDS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 10. Argued October 20, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. Pleadings must be construed reasonably and not with such strictness as to refuse, to' adopt the natu
United States v. Thomas
UNITED STATES v. THOMAS. THOMAS v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. Nos. 94, 95. Argued October 11, 1904. Decided December 5, 1904. While the intention of Congress in the Navy Personnel Act of March 3, 1899, was to put offic
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.