Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1905 Cases
220 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Royal Packing Co. v. United States
ROYAL PACKING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 86. Argued November 29, 1905. Decided December 29, 1905. Decided on authority of Russian-A merican Packing Company v. United States, ante, p. 570. Mr. Alexander Br
Wabash Railroad v. Loeb
No. 190. Wabash Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bernard Loeb. December 18, 1905. Mr. Wells H. Blodgett for plaintiff in error. Mr. John Cos-grove for defendant in error.
Iroquois Transportation Co. v. A. Harvey's Sons Manufacturing Co.
No. 512. The Iroquois Transportation Company, etc., Petitioner, v. A. Harvey's Sons Manufacturing Company. December 18, 1905. Mr, Charles E. Kremer for petitionér. Mr. Henry B. Graves for respondent.
Mutual Reserve Life Insurance v. Birch
No. 344. Mutual Reserve Life Insurance Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Henry C. Birch. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted November 13, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. Mr. Gordon T. Hughes for plaintiff in error. Mr. Gilbert E. Roe for
Behn v. Campbell
No. 107. Behn, Meyer & Co., Appellants, v. Campbell & Go Tauco. Argued December 8, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. Mr. C. C. Carlin, Mr. Henry E. Davis and Mr. Louis C. Barley for appellants. Mr. Aldis B. Browne and Mr. Alexander Britton f
Minnesota Iron Co. v. Kline
MINNESOTA IRON COMPANY v. KLINE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 96. Argued December 5, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. If a state statute as interpreted by the highest court of the State is not violative of the F
Eclipse Bicycle Co. v. Farrow
ECLIPSE BICYCLE COMPANY v. FARROW. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF -THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 40, 217. Argued November 3, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. A bicycle manufacturing company made a contract with an inventor to us-', o
Alexander v. Crollott
ALEXANDER v. CROLLOTT, JUSTICE OF THE PEACE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF NEW MEXICO. No. 118, Submitted November 27,1905. Decided December 18, 1905. Although a writ of prohibition will lie to an inferior court acting m
Russian-American Packing Co. v. United States
RUSSIAN-AMERICAN PACKING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. Nos. 85, 86. Argued' November 29, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. Appellant without authority settled on a tract of land on Afognak Island, Alaska, prior t
Sjoli v. Dreschel
SJOLI v. DRESCHEL. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 79. Submitted November 27, 1905. Decided December 18, 1905. 1. The Northern Pacific Railroad Company could not acquire a vested interest in particular lands, withi
Wabash Railroad v. Mathew
No. 92. Wabash Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Genevieve Halstead Mathew. In error to the Kansas City Court of Appeals for the State of Missouri. Argued December 5, 1905. Decided December 11, 1905. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr.
New York ex rel. Lieberman v. Van De Carr
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. LIEBERMAN v. VAN DE CARR, WARDEN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP NEW YORK. No. 71. Argued November 9,1005. Decided December 11, 1905. A State has the right, in the exercise of the poli
Riggins v. United States
RIGGINS v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT'OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OP ALÁBAMA. No. 169. Submitted November 9,1905. Decided December 11, 1905. The writ Of- habeas corpus will not issue unless the court und
Gore v. United States
No. 66. John C. Gore, Jr., et al., Appellants, v. The United States et al. Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of California. Submitted November 9, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Mr. Hamilton Gay Ho
Clark v. Roller
CLARK v. ROLLER. ROLLER v. CLARK. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 72, 451. Argued November 9, 10, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Semble a bill for partition cannot be made the.means of trying a disputed
Trono v. United States
TRONO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE'PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 34. Argued October 31, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Plaintiffs in error were tried for murder in the court of lirsj, instance in the Philippine Islands and
Foppiano v. Speed
FOPPIANO v. SPEED. SAME v. SAME. ERROR .TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TENNESSEE. Nos. 67 and 68. Argued November 9, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Since the passage of the Wilson Act of August .8, 1890, 26 Stat. 313, there is a dist
Petri v. F. E. Creelman Lumber Co.
PETRI v. F. E. CREELMAN LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS. No. 49. Argued November 7, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Where it is plainly apparent on the record that the on
Manigault v. Springs
MANIGAULT v. SPRINGS. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 46. Submitted November 2, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. In the absence of legislation by Congress, a State has full power to
South Carolina v. United States
SOUTH CAROLINA v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 10. Argued April 11, 1905. Decided December 4, 1905. Persons who sell liquor are not relieved from liability for the internal revenue tax imposed by the Federal Governmen
McCune v. Essig
McCUNE v. ESSIG. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 61. Submitted November 9, 1905.- Decided November 29, 1905. The interest which arises in an- entryman by his entry, who can fulfil the conditions of settle
Rogers v. Peck
ROGERS v. PECK. APPEAL FROM THE. DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES . ’ FOR THE DISTRICT OF VERMONT. No. 368. Argued November 6, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. The Governor of Vermont has ample power to .grant reprieves to persons senten
United States v. Utah, Nevada & California Stage Co.
UNITED STATES v. UTAH, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA STAGE COMPANY. UTAH, NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA STAGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEALS PROM THE COURT OP CLAIMS. ' Nos. 51 and 52. Submitted November 8, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. In construing
Carroll v. Greenwich Insurance
CARROLL v. GREENWICH INSURANCE COMPANY OF NEW YORK. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF IOWA. No. 50, Argued November 7, 8, 1905.- Decided November 27, 1905. Section 1754 of the Iowa Code of 1897,
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.