Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1905 Cases
220 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Simpson v. United States
SIMPSON v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE-COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 31. Argued October 27, 30,1905. Decided November 27, 1905. In construing a contract with the Commissary General for supplies to posts in Cuba described at one place as “remote f
Estes v. Timmons
ESTES v. TIMMONS. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ■ OKLAHOMA. No. 74. Submitted November 10,1905. Decided November 27, 1905. The decision of the proper officers of the Land Department on questions of fact in a contest is c
Jack v. Kansas
JACK v. KANSAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 54. Argued November 8, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. This court is bound by the decision of the highest court óf a State that a state statute does not violate any pro
Royal Insurance v. Miller
ROYAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. MILLER. ERROR TO THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF PORTO RICO. No. 7. Argued October 17, 18, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. The owner of an estate in Porto Rico mortgaged' the property
Hafemann v. Gross
HAFEMANN v. GROSS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 64. Argued November 9, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. A preémptor made an agreement with a party advancing money to pay one-fourth of the expenses of making fina
Hartman v. Butterfield Lumber Co.
HARTMAN v. BUTTERFIELD LUMBER COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP MISSISSIPPI. No. 44. Argued November 7, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. A homesteader, after obtaining his patent, conveyed to a lumber company all the stand
Gardner v. Michigan
GARDNER v. MICHIGAN. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 62. Submitted November 9, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. Reduction Co., v. Sanitary Works, ante, p. 306, followed as to • the power of municipal authorities to
California Reduction Co. v. Sanitary Reduction Works
CALIFORNIA REDUCTION COMPANY v. SANITARY REDUCTION WORKS. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT. No. 25. Argued October 26, 27, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. The Board of Supervisors of the- city and county of
Donovan v. Pennsylvania Co.
DONOVAN v. PENNSYLVANIA COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 5. Argued January 5, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. Although its functions are public, a railroad company holds the legal title to th
French v. Taylor
FRENCH v. TAYLOR. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF "WASHINGTON. No. 57. Argued November 8, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. Where the validity of a state revenue statute itself is not drawn in question, but plaintiff in error cont
Cochran v. Montgomery County
COCHRAN AND THE FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY v. MONTGOMERY COUNTY. SAME v. SAME. ERROR AND CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 37, 112. Argued November 2,1905. Decided November 27, 1905. 1. A citizen of Al
Sweeney v. Carter Oil Co.
SWEENEY v. CARTER OIL COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA. No. 32. Submitted October 30, 1905. Decided November 27, 1905. Where suit is brought iii the district of defendant’s
Citizens' National Bank v. Kentucky ex rel. Boyle County
No. 43. The Citizens’ National Bank et al., Plaintiffs in Error, v. Commonwealth of Kentucky, use, etc., of Boyle County. In error to the Court of Appeals of the State of Kentucky.. Argument for plaintiffs in error commenced November 6, 190
Chesapeake Beach Railway Co. v. Washington, Potomac & Chesapeake Railroad
CHESAPEAKE BEACH RAILWAY COMPANY v. WASHINGTON, POTOMAC AND CHESAPEAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 35. Argued October 31, November 1, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. In an action of ejec
Tampa Water Works Co. v. Tampa
TAMPA WATER WORKS COMPANY v. TAMPA. ERROR TO the SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP FLORIDA. No. 29. Argued October 27, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. The constitution of Florida has a clause to the effect that the legislature is invested with
Attorney General of Michigan ex rel. Kies v. Lowrey
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN UPON THE RELATION OF KIES v. LOWREY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 21. Argued October 23, 24,1905. Decided November 13, 1905. It is the power and duty of this court to det
Rankin v. Barton
RANKIN v. BARTON. . ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS. No. 125. Submitted October 17, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. A national bank is an instrumentality of the United States, the administration whereof is vested in the C
Marvin v. Trout
MARVIN v. TROUT. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP OHIO. Nos. 19, 20. Argued October 24, 25, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. A certificate of the presiding judge of the state court made after the decision. to the effect that a Fed
Union Refrigerator Transit Co. v. Kentucky
UNION REFRIGERATOR TRANSIT COMPANY v. KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. No. 84. Argued October 13, 16, 1905. Decided November 13, 1905. The power of taxation is exercised upon the asshmption of an equi
Corkran Oil & Development Co. v. Arnaudet
CORKRAN OIL AND DEVELOPMENT COMPANY v. ARNAUDET. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA. No. 22. Argued October 24, 25,1905. Decided November 13, 1905. A petition for rehearing to the Supreme Court of the State is too late to
Nederland Life Insurance v. Meinert
NEDERLAND LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, LIMITED, v. MEINERT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR • THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 11. Argued October 18, 1905. Decided November 6, 1905. Promptness of payment-ef life insurance premiums is esse
Union Pacific Railroad v. Mason City & Fort Dodge Railroad
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY v. MASON CITY AND FORT DODGE RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 18. Argued October 19 and 20, 1905. Decided November 6, 1905. A distinct ruling on any questi
Delahanty v. Pitkin
No. 26. John J. Delahanty, Plaintiff in Error, v. William T. Pitkin et al. In error to the Supreme Court of Errors of the State of Connecticut. Argued October 27, 1905. Decided October 30, 1905. Mr. Lewis E. Stanton and Mr. Sidney E. Clarke
Guthrie v. Harkness
GUTHRIE v. HARKNESS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 9. Submitted, April 6, 1905; ordered for oral argument, May 8,1905; argued October 19,1905.' Decided October 30, 1905. States have no power to enact legislation contr
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.