Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Whittaker v. A. B. Baxter & Co.
No. 527. No. 528. James C. Whittaker, Administrator, etc., Petitioner, v. A. B. Baxter and Company; and Adolph Joseph, Petitioner, v. A. B. Baxter and Company. December 23, 1907. Mr. Frederick M. Czaki for .petitioners. Mr. Edward Jacobs fo
Corsicana Petroleum Co. v. Staley
No. 409. Corsicana Petroleum Company, Petitioner, v. W. H. Staley. December 23, 1907. Mr. W. J. McKie arid Mr. Frederick S. Tyler for petitioner. Mr. E. St. Clair Thompson and Mr. R. S. Neblett for respondent.
Stewart v. Louisiana
No. 74. Louis Stewart, Plaintiff in Error, v. The State of Louisiana. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana. Submitted December 16, 1907. Decided December 23, 1907. Mr. Murphy J. Foster for plaintiff in error. Mr:- Walter
The Hamilton
THE HAMILTON. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 71. Argued October 24, 1907. Decided December 23, 1907. Until Congress acts on the subject^ a State may legislate in regard to the duties and liabilities o
Water v. City of Hutchinson
WATER, LIGHT AND GAS COMPANY OF HUTCHINSON v. THE CITY OF HUTCHINSON, KANSAS. SAME v. SAME. . APPEALS PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OP KANSAS. Nos. 53, 54. Argued October 24, 1907. Decided December 23, 1907. A
Buitrago v. People of Porto Rico
No. 534. Eugenio Buitrago, Appellant, v. The People of Porto Rico. Appeal from the Supreme Court of Porto Rico. December 16, 1907. No one opposing.
Steward v. American Lava Co.
No. 508. No. 509. Demetrius M. Steward et al., Petitioners, v. American Lava Company et al; and Moritz Moritz Kirchberger et al., Petitioners, v. American Lava Company et al. December 16, 1907. Mr. Louis C. Raegener for petitioners. Mr. Cha
Werckmeister v. American Tobacco Co.
WERCKMEISTER v. AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY. EBBOB TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOB THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 29. Argued October 30, 1907. Decided December 16, 1907. Section 4965, Rev. Stat., as amended by the act of March 2, 1895, 28 Stat. 9
Flemister v. United States
FLEMISTER v. UNITED STATES. ERROR' TO THE SUPREME COURT OE THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 70. Submitted December 5, 1907. Decided December 16, 1907. Trono v. United States, 199 U. S. 521, followed as to the power of the Supreme Court of the Ph
Paraiso v. United States
PARAISO v. UNITED STATES. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 23. Submitted December 2, 1907. Decided December 16, 1907. Where a ease is brought up from the Circuit Court on the ground that the construction or applicat
Vandalia Railroad v. Indiana ex rel. City of South Bend
VANDALIA RAILROAD COMPANY v. INDIANA ex rel. THE CITY OF SOUTH BEND. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 26. Argued October 18, 1907. Decided December 16, 1907. The construction of a pleading, the meaning to be given to
Heath & Milligan Manufacturing Co. v. Worst
HEATH & MILLIGAN MANUFACTURING COMPANY v. WORST. APPEAL FROM THE' CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA. No. 41. Argued November 7, 8, 1907. Decided December 9, 1907. It is within the power of the State to prev
Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Wharton
ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY v. WHARTON et al., RAILROAD COMMISSIONERS OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 36. Argued November 5, 1907. Decided December 9, 1907. Any exercis
Oregon Short Line Railroad v. McManus
No. 46. Oregon Short Line Railroad Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Adda McManus, etc. In error to the St. Louis Court of Appeals, State- of Missouri. Submitted November 11, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Mr. Martin L. Clardy- and Mr. J. D.
Polk v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Ass'n
POLK v. MUTUAL RESERVE FUND LIFE ASSOCIATION OF NEW YORK. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 45. Argued November 11, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Where there is a reserved power in the legislature t
Chunn v. City & Suburban Railway
CHUNN v. CITY AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY OF WASHINGTON. ERROR TO THE'COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 43. Argued November 8, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. An intending passenger coming to a place where passengers habitually boa
American Tobacco Co. v. Werckmeister
AMERICAN TOBACCO COMPANY v. WERCKMEISTER. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR TH'E SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 28. Argued October 30, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. In construing a statute, while the court must gain the legislative intent pr
Patch v. Wabash Railroad
PATCH v. WABASH RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP ILLINOIS. No. 57. Argued November 15, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. The certificate of a judge of the Circuit Court that the ju
Arkansas Southern Railroad v. German National Bank
ARKANSAS SOUTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. GERMAN NATIONAL BANK. IN ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ARKANSAS. No. 56. Argued November 14, 15, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Unless the decision upon a Federal question was necessary to
Bank of Kentucky v. Kentucky
BANK OF KENTUCKY v. COMMONWEALTH OF KENTUCKY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF KENTUCKY. No. 87. Argued October 23, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. A municipal corporation is not necessarily bound by the decree in a suit agains
Ozan Lumber Co. v. Union County National Bank
OZAN LUMBER COMPANY v. UNION COUNTY NATIONAL BANK OF LIBERTY. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 37. Submitted November 5, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Woods & Sons v. Carl, 20
Earle v. Myers
EARLE v. MYERS. SAME v. SAME. APPEALS FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. Nos. 12, 388. Argued October 15, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. In an accounting for attorneys’ fees for collection of claims against the Governme
United States v. R. P. Andrews & Co.
UNITED STATES v. R. P. ANDREWS & COMPANY. APPEAL PROM THE| COURT OP CLAIMS. No. 44. Argued November 8, 11, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. , Whether the Philippine Islands are a distinct governmental entity for whose contracts the United St
Bitterman v. Louisville & Nashville Railroad
BITTERMAN v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT. No. 34. Argued November 4, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Railroad companies have the right to sell non-transferablé
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.