Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1907 Cases
247 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Vail v. Arizona
VAIL v. TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF ARIZONA. No. 67. Argued November 15, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Stare ’decisis is a wholesome doctrine, and, while not of universal application, is especia
Cortelyou v. Charles Eneu Johnson & Co.
CORTELYOU v. CHARLES ENEU JOHNSON & COMPANY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 32. Argued October 31, November 1, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. In this case this court follows the unanimous opinion of
Shoener v. Pennsylvania
SHOENER v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 161. Argued October 28, 19807. Decided December, 2, 1907. One is not put in jeopardy if the indictment under which he is tried is so radic
Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt
PENNSYLVANIA COAL AND COKE COMPANY v. CASSATT. CERTIORARI to the circuit court of appeals for the third CIRCUIT. No. 284. Argued October 28, 29, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. Decided on authority of preceding case. 150 Fed. Rep. 48, rever
Webster Coal & Coke Co. v. Cassatt
WEBSTER COAL AND COKE COMPANY v. CASSATT. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT. No, 283, Argued October 28, 29, 1907. Decided December 2, 1907. An order of the Circuit Court under § 724, Rev. Stat., adjudging and
Great Northern Railway Co. v. United States
No. 491. Great Northern Railway Company, Petitioner, v. The United States. November 18, 1907. Mr. Wm.- R. Begg, Mr. Rome G. Brown and Mr. C. S. Albert for petitioner. The Attorney General and Mr. Assistant to the Attorney General Purdy for
New York Continental Jewell Filtration Co. v. Wynkoop
No. 362. The New York Continental Jewell Filtration Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Mary E. Wynkoop. In error to the Court of Appeals, of the District of Columbia. Motion to dismiss submitted November 11, 1907. Decided November 18, 1907. Mr
Hunter v. City of Pittsburgh
HUNTER v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP PENNSYLVANIA. No. 264. Argued October 25, 28, 1907. Decided November 18, 1907. The policy, wisdom, justice and fairness of a state statute, and its conformity to the s
Chambers v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad
CHAMBERS v. BALTIMORE AND OHIO RAILROAD COMPANY. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OHIO. No. 22. Argued October 17, 18, 1907. Decided November 18, 1907. This court has jurisdiction to review the judgment on writ of error under § 70
Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. Wright
CENTRAL OF GEORGIA RAILWAY COMPANY v. WRIGHT, COMPTROLLER-GENERAL OF GEORGIA. GEORGIA RAILROAD AND BANKING COMPANY v. SAME. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF GEORGIA. Nos. 85, 89. Argued October 21, 22, 23, 1907. Decided November 1
Taylor v. States
TAYLOR v. UNITED STATES. UNITED STATES v. MACDONALD. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED' STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA. Nos. 238, 404. Argued October 24
Kent v. People of Porto Rico
KENT v. PEOPLE OF PORTO RICO. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP PORTO RICO. No. 31. Argued October 30, 31, 1907. Decided November 18, 1907. Amado v. United States, 195 U. S. 172, followed as to when this court cannot review the .final judgment
People ex rel. McNichols v. Pease
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS ex rel. McNICHOLS v. PEASE, SHERIFF OF COOK COUNTY. EEEOE TO THE SUPEEME COUET OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 19. Argued October 16, 17, 1907. Decided November 18, 1907. Habeas corpus is an appropriate pro
Anderson v. Zaring
No. 146. Henry T. Anderson, Appellant, v. Andrew J. Zaring. Appeal from the Supreme Court of the Territory of Oklahoma. November 11, 1907. Mr-. S. H. Harris for appellant. No appearance for appellee.
Leathe v. Thomas
LEATHE v. THOMAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP ILLINOIS. No. 21. Argued October 17, 1907. Decided November 11, 1907. In a case coming from a state court this court can consider only Federal questions decided adversely to the p
Chapman v. Bowen
CHAPMAN, TRUSTEE IN BANKRUPTCY OF McCOY, v. BOWEN. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP APPEALS POR THE SEVENTH CIRCUIT. No. 168. Submitted October 14, 1907. Decided November 11, 1907. Clause 3 of general order in bankruptcy XXXVI applies to ap
Peck v. Lewis
No. 463. Samuel Peck et al., Petitioners, v. James Hamilton Lewis. November 4, 1907. Mr. Levi Davis for petitioners. Mr. Holmes Conrad for respondent.
Foster v. Rowe
No. 451. Nathaniel C. Foster, Plaintiff in Error, v. William Rowe, Impleaded, etc. In error to the Supreme Court of the State of Wisconsin. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 28, 1907. Decided November 4, 1907. Mr. W. M. Tomkins
Interstate Consolidated Street Railway Co. v. Massachusetts
INTERSTATE CONSOLIDATED STREET RAILWAY COMPANY v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS. ERROR TO THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS. No. 13. Argued October 15, 16, 1907. Decided November 4, 1907. Requirements contained in another sta
Seaboard Air Line Railway v. Seegers
SEABOARD AIR LINE RAILWAY v. SEEGERS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE. STATE OP SOUTH CAROLINA. No. 15. Argued October 16, 1907. Decided November 4, 1907. Where a state statute applies to both intrastate and interstate shipments, but the
Castello v. Ruffer
No. 1. Agustin Castello, Appellant, v. Ernest Ruffer et al. Appeal from the District Court of- the United States for Porto Rico. October 28, 1907. Mr. James S. Harlan and Mr. John Maynard Harlan for appellant. Mr. N. B. K. Pettingill for ap
Blakely v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance
No. 332. John Blakely, Petitioner, v. Fidelity Mutual Life Insurance Company. October 28, 1907. Mr. W. B. Linn and Mr. George H. Stein for petitioner. Mr. Ira Jewell 'Williams for respondent.
Dupree v. Mansur
No. 380. Mollie E. Dupree et al., Petitioners, v. C. W. Mansur. October 28, 1907. Mr. J. J. Darlington for petitioners. Mr. J. M. McCormick for respondent.
Baird v. Monroe
No. 306. W. F. Baird, Administrator, etc., Plaintiff in Error, v. J. D. Monroe et al. In error to the Supremo Court of the State of California. Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907. Decided October 28, 1907. Mr. Rufus H.
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.