Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 312,996+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1908 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Home Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City of Los Angeles
HOME TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. No. 173. Argued October 21, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. Only the legislature of a
Garfield v. United States ex rel. Allison
GARFIELD, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. ALLISON. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. Nos. 249, 250. Argued October 15, 18, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. Decided on the authority of Garfield v.
Garfield v. United States ex rel. Goldsby
GARFIELD, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR, v. UNITED STATES ex rel. GOLDSBY. ERROR TO THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 248. Argued October 15, 18, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. While acts of public officials which require
Wilder v. Inter-Island Steam Navigation Co.
WILDER, ASSESSOR, v. INTER-ISLAND STEAM NAVIGATION COMPANY, LIMITED. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 30. Submitted October 22, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. Section 4536, Rev. Stat., providing that seamen’s wag
Prentis v. Atlantic Coast Line Co.
PRENTIS et al., CONSTITUTING THE STATE CORPORATION COMMISSION OF VIRGINIA, v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE COMPANY. SAME v. CHESAPEAKE AND OHIO RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. CHESAPEAKE WESTERN RAILWAY. SAME v. LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY. S
Pickford v. Talbott
PICKFORD v. TALBOTT. ERROR TO THE COURT OE APPEARS OP THE DISTRICT OP COLUMBIA. No. 13. Argued October 26, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. Crime and credulity are not the same and mere neglect on the part of a prosecuting officer to invest
Phœnix Bridge Co. v. United States
PHŒNIX BRIDGE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL PROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 26. Argued November 12, 13, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. In a contract with the Government for the reconstruction of a draw-span bridge which provides for comp
Bowers Hydraulic Dredging Co. v. United States
BOWERS HYDRAULIC DREDGING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 9. Argued November 11, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. Where words used in a contract are plain and unambiguous, expert testimony, as to their commerc
Cotton v. Territory of Hawaii ex rel. Holloway
COTTON v. TERRITORY OF HAWAII, BY HOLLOWAY, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP HAWAII. No. 7. Argued October 27, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. The elementary rule, that the power of this court
American Sugar Refining Co. v. United States
AMERICAN SUGAR REFINING COMPANY v. UNITED STATES. APPEAL FBOM THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OP NEW YORK. No. 3. Argued November 11, 1908. Decided November 30, 1908. A direct appeal from the Circuit Court w
Enriquez v. A. S. Watson & Co.
ENRIQUEZ, ADMR., ETC., v. A. S. WATSON & CO., LIMITED. WRIT OP ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS. No. 5. Argued November 11, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. A writ of error to review judgment of the Supreme Court of the
Western Loan & Savings Co. v. Colorado Smelting & Mining Co.
WESTERN LOAN & SAVINGS COMPANY v. COLORADO SMELTING & MINING COMPANY. WRIT OP ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OP THE UNITED STATES POR THE DISTRICT OP MONTANA. No. 581. Submitted November 9, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. Western Loan Co. v. B
Ex parte Patrick
Ex parte PATRICK. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.' Submitted November 9, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. Appeal from decision of the Circuit Court denying a petition for habeas corp
In re Hardrat
MATTER OF HARDRAT. APPLICATION FOB WBIT OF HABEAS COBPUS. Original. Submitted November 9, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. Leave to file petition for habeas corpus by person confined under inde-, terminate sentence act of Michigan, denied.
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
LOUISVILLE AND NASHVILLE RAILROAD COMPANY v. MOTTLEY. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF KENTUCKY. No. 37. Argued October 13, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. The jurisdiction of the Circuit Court
Kaizo v. Henry
KAIZO v. HENRY, HIGH SHERIFF OF HAWAII. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF •' HAWAII. No. 27. Argued October 29, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. While a court of competent jurisdiction may discharge a prisoner held by another c
Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. Wilder
HONOLULU RAPID TRANSIT AND LAND COMPANY v. WILDER, ASSESSOR. ERROR TO THE'SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 22. Argued October 28, 29, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. Where the record does not show that any Federal question was
Honolulu Rapid Transit & Land Co. v. Wilder
HONOLULU RAPID TRANSIT AND LAND COMPANY v. WILDER, ASSESSOR. APPEAL' FROM THE SUPREME COURT OP THE TERRITORY OP Hawaii. No. 23. Argued October 28, 29, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. In determining rights and liabilities, local legislation
Washington v. Oregon
STATE OF WASHINGTON v. STATE OF OREGON. ORIGINAL, IN EQUITT. No. 3. Argued January 8, 9, 1908. Decided November 16, 1908. Congress cannot change the boundary of a State without its consent. In the absence of specific statement to that effec
United States v. Mountain Copper Co.
No. 4. The United States, Appellant, v. The Mountain Copper Company, Limited.
Devou v. City of Cincinnati
No. 590. Sarah O. Devou, Petitioner, v. The City of Cincinnati. November 9, 1908.
Coulson v. Government of the Canal Zone
COULSON v. GOVERNMENT OF THE CANAL ZONE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE CANAL ZONE. No. 187. Motion to dismiss or affirm. Submitted November 2, 1908. Decided November 9, 1908. Writ of error to review, judgment of the Supreme Court of the
Twining v. New Jersey
TWINING v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY. ERROR TO THE COURT OP ERRORS AND APPEALS OP THE STATE OP NEW JERSEY. No. 10. Argued March 19, 20, 1908. Decided November 9, 1908. The judicial act of the highest court of a State in authoritatively construing
Louisiana v. Garfield
STATE OF LOUISIANA v. GARFIELD, SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR. ORIGINAL IN EQUITY.’ No. 7. Argued October 27, 28, 1908. Decided November 9, 1908. This court has no jurisdiction of an action brought by a State against the Secretary of the Interi
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.