Find court opinions that match your case.
Search 313,007+ US court opinions imported from the Caselaw Access Project — Supreme Court, federal circuits, and state high courts. Filter by practice area, state, outcome, and connect with the attorneys who tried them.
Latest Opinions · freshly imported court decisions
The most recent court rulings now available in the library. Click through for the full opinion, the attorneys involved, and related cases.
Blanchard v. Steward Carney Hosp., Inc.
Doe v. Sex Offender Registry Bd.
Commonwealth v. Gomes
Marchese v. Bos. Redevelopment Auth.
Veolia Energy Bos., Inc. v. Bd. of Assessors of Bos.
Bos. Globe Media Partners, LLC v. Chief Justice of the Trial Court
Commonwealth v. Reyes
United States v. Block
1908 Cases
226 matching opinions . Filter by practice area below, or use the search above for free-text matching against title and syllabus.
Browse by State 28
Browse by Year 40
Kansas City Northwestern Railroad v. Zimmerman
KANSAS CITY NORTHWESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY v. ZIMMERMAN. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE DISTRICT OF KANSAS. No. 231. Submitted April 28, 1908. Decided June 1, 1908. Where the ground on which the jurisdiction of th
Delmar Jockey Club v. Missouri
DELMAR JOCKEY CLUB v. MISSOURI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSOURI. No. 219. Argued April 29, 30, 1908. Decided June 1, 1908. Even if the state court erred in a proceeding over which it has. exclusive jurisdiction such erro
Municipality of Ponce v. Roman Catholic Apostolic Church in Porto Rico
MUNICIPALITY OF PONCE v. ROMAN CATHOLIC APOSTOLIC CHURCH IN PORTO RICO. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF PORTO RICO. No. 143. Argued March 3, 1908. Decided June 1, 1908. Under the organic act of Porto Rico, March 2, 1901, 31 Stat. 77, the l
St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co. v. Taylor
ST. LOUIS, IRON MOUNTAIN AND SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. TAYLOR, ADMINISTRATRIX. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF ARKANSAS. No. 201. Argued April 14, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. Each State may, subject to restrictions of the Feder
City of St. Louis v. United Railways Co.
CITY OF ST. LOUIS v. UNITED RAILWAYS COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS AND SUBURBAN RAILWAY COMPANY. SAME v. ST. LOUIS AND MERAMEC RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY. APPEALS FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI. No
In re Wood & Henderson
In re WOOD AND HENDERSON. CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. No. 167. Submitted March 6, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. Congress has the right to establish a uniform system of bankruptcy throughout the United
Fauntleroy v. Lum
FAUNTLEROY v. LUM. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 215. Argued April 27, 28, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. A judgment is conclusive as to all thie media concludendi, and it cannot be impeached either in or out of t
Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. Texas
GALVESTON, HARRISBURG AND SAN ANTONIO RAILWAY COMPANY v. STATE OF TEXAS. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OP THE STATE OP TEXAS. No. 207. Argued April 21, 22, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. The statute of Texas of April 17, 1905, c. 141, imposing
Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co. v. Lewisohn
OLD DOMINION COPPER MINING AND SMELTING COMPANY v. LEWISOHN. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 206. Argued April 16, 20, 1008. Decided May 18, 1908. A corporation remains unchanged and unaffected in its
Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. Mississippi
MOBILE, JACKSON AND KANSAS CITY RAILROAD COMPANY v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI. No. 218. Argued April 29, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. The creation of a board of railroad commissioners and
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Porter
CLEVELAND, CINCINNATI, CHICAGO AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY COMPANY v. PORTER. ERROR TO DIVISION NUMBER TWO OF THE APPELLATE COURT OF THE STATE OF INDIANA. No. 213. Argued April 27, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. It is within the legislative power of
Sanderson v. United States
SANDERSON v. UNITED STATES AND THE CHEYENNE INDIANS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF CLAIMS. No. 208. Argued April 22, 23, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. The provisions of § 1088, Rev.- Stat., relative to new trials in Court of Claims cases are appli
Boston & Maine Railroad v. Gokey
BOSTON AND MAINE RAILROAD v. GOKEY. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 198. Argued April 14, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. A defendant defeated on the merits after having specially assailed the jurisdiction
Kealoha v. Castle
KEALOHA v. CASTLE. APPEAL FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE TERRITORY OF HAWAII. No. 230. Submitted April 28, 1908. Decided May 18, 1908. The courts of Hawaii having prior to the annexation construed the statute of May 24, 1866, legitimatizing
Farrell v. Lockhart
FARRELL v. LOCKHART. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF UTAH. No. 170. Submitted March 9, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. Ground embraced in a mining location may become part of the public domain so as to be subject to another locatio
La Bourgogne
LA BOURGOGNE. ON WRIT AND CROSS WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. No. 33. Argued November 1, 1907. — Decided May 18, 1908. The decree of the District Court in a proceeding for limitation of liability
Brown v. Fletcher's Estate
BROWN v. FLETCHER’S ESTATE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MICHIGAN. No. 220. Argued April 30, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. The full faith and credit clause of the Federal Coñstitution does not' preclude the courts, of a State
Reuben Quick Bear v. Leupp
REUBEN QUICK BEAR v. LEUPP, COMMISSIONER OF INDIAN AFFAIRS. APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA. No. 569. Argued February 26, 27, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. A statutory limitation on expenditures of the public fu
Gazlay v. Williams
GAZLAY v. WILLIAMS, TRUSTEE OF BROWN, BANKRUPT. APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 164. Argued March 11, 1908. — Decided May 18, 1908. Where the trustee can only sell a lease subject to the claim of the less
St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co. v. Donohue
ST. PAUL, MINNEAPOLIS & MANITOBA RAILWAY COMPANY v. DONOHUE. ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. No. 440. Submitted January 10, 1908. — Decided May 4, 1908. A homesteader who initiates a right to either surveyed or unsurve
Empire State Cattle Co. v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
EMPIRE STATE CATTLE COMPANY v. ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY. MINNESOTA AND DAKOTA CATTLE COMPANY v. SAME. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT. Nos. 178, 179. Argued March 13, 16, 1908. — Decided
United States v. Dickinson
No. 731. The United States, Petitioner, v. John W. Dickinson. May 4, 1908. The Attorney General and The Solicitor General for petitioner. Mr. Frank W. Hackett and Mr. Samuel L. Powers for respondent.
Virginia v. West Virginia
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA v. STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA. IN EQUITY. No. 4, Original: Forms of decree appointing special master, submitted April 7,1908. Form of decree announced May 4, 1908. Order referring cause to master and directing condition
Scully v. Bird
SCULLY v. BIRD. APPEAL PROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN. No. 353. Submitted April 20, 1908. Decided May 4, 1908. This court will not assume an inconsistency to exist between the opinion of the
Need an attorney for a case like these?
Browse 7,507+ verified US attorneys whose names appear in real court opinions. Filter by practice area and state to find someone with relevant experience.